Cargando…

Opening up the black box of a Gateway to Medicine programme: a realist evaluation

OBJECTIVES: A Gateway to Medicine programme, developed in partnership between a further and higher education setting and implemented to increase the socioeconomic diversity of medicine, was examined to identify precisely what works within the programme and why. DESIGN: This study employed realist ev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gibson Smith, Kathrine, Alexander, Kirsty, Cleland, Jennifer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8280889/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34261690
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049993
_version_ 1783722736806264832
author Gibson Smith, Kathrine
Alexander, Kirsty
Cleland, Jennifer
author_facet Gibson Smith, Kathrine
Alexander, Kirsty
Cleland, Jennifer
author_sort Gibson Smith, Kathrine
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: A Gateway to Medicine programme, developed in partnership between a further and higher education setting and implemented to increase the socioeconomic diversity of medicine, was examined to identify precisely what works within the programme and why. DESIGN: This study employed realist evaluation principles and was undertaken in three phases: document analysis and qualitative focus groups with widening access (WA) programme architects; focus groups and interviews with staff and students; generation of an idea of what works. SETTING: Participants were recruited from a further/higher education setting and were either enrolled or involved in the delivery of a Gateway to Medicine programme. PARTICIPANTS: Twelve staff were interviewed either individually (n=3) or in one of three group interviews. Nine focus groups (ranging from 5 to 18 participants in each focus group) were carried out with Gateway students from three consecutive cohorts at 2–3 points in their Gateway programme year. RESULTS: Data were generated to determine what ‘works’ in the Gateway programme. Turning a realist lens on the data identified six inter-relating mechanisms which helped students see medicine as attainable and achievable and prepared them for the transition to medical school. These were academic confidence (M1); developing professional identity (M2); financial support/security (M3); supportive relationships with staff (M4) and peers (M5); and establishing a sense of belonging as a university student (M6). CONCLUSIONS: By unpacking the ‘black box’ of a Gateway programme through realist evaluation, we have shown that such programmes are not solely about providing knowledge and skills but are rather much more complex in respect to how they work. Further work is needed to further test the mechanisms identified in our study in other contexts for theory development and to identify predictors of effectiveness in terms of students’ preparedness to transition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8280889
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82808892021-07-30 Opening up the black box of a Gateway to Medicine programme: a realist evaluation Gibson Smith, Kathrine Alexander, Kirsty Cleland, Jennifer BMJ Open Medical Education and Training OBJECTIVES: A Gateway to Medicine programme, developed in partnership between a further and higher education setting and implemented to increase the socioeconomic diversity of medicine, was examined to identify precisely what works within the programme and why. DESIGN: This study employed realist evaluation principles and was undertaken in three phases: document analysis and qualitative focus groups with widening access (WA) programme architects; focus groups and interviews with staff and students; generation of an idea of what works. SETTING: Participants were recruited from a further/higher education setting and were either enrolled or involved in the delivery of a Gateway to Medicine programme. PARTICIPANTS: Twelve staff were interviewed either individually (n=3) or in one of three group interviews. Nine focus groups (ranging from 5 to 18 participants in each focus group) were carried out with Gateway students from three consecutive cohorts at 2–3 points in their Gateway programme year. RESULTS: Data were generated to determine what ‘works’ in the Gateway programme. Turning a realist lens on the data identified six inter-relating mechanisms which helped students see medicine as attainable and achievable and prepared them for the transition to medical school. These were academic confidence (M1); developing professional identity (M2); financial support/security (M3); supportive relationships with staff (M4) and peers (M5); and establishing a sense of belonging as a university student (M6). CONCLUSIONS: By unpacking the ‘black box’ of a Gateway programme through realist evaluation, we have shown that such programmes are not solely about providing knowledge and skills but are rather much more complex in respect to how they work. Further work is needed to further test the mechanisms identified in our study in other contexts for theory development and to identify predictors of effectiveness in terms of students’ preparedness to transition. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8280889/ /pubmed/34261690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049993 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Medical Education and Training
Gibson Smith, Kathrine
Alexander, Kirsty
Cleland, Jennifer
Opening up the black box of a Gateway to Medicine programme: a realist evaluation
title Opening up the black box of a Gateway to Medicine programme: a realist evaluation
title_full Opening up the black box of a Gateway to Medicine programme: a realist evaluation
title_fullStr Opening up the black box of a Gateway to Medicine programme: a realist evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Opening up the black box of a Gateway to Medicine programme: a realist evaluation
title_short Opening up the black box of a Gateway to Medicine programme: a realist evaluation
title_sort opening up the black box of a gateway to medicine programme: a realist evaluation
topic Medical Education and Training
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8280889/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34261690
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049993
work_keys_str_mv AT gibsonsmithkathrine openinguptheblackboxofagatewaytomedicineprogrammearealistevaluation
AT alexanderkirsty openinguptheblackboxofagatewaytomedicineprogrammearealistevaluation
AT clelandjennifer openinguptheblackboxofagatewaytomedicineprogrammearealistevaluation