Cargando…

Development and validation of the Maudsley Modified Patient Health Questionnaire (MM-PHQ-9)

BACKGROUND: The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is a widely used measure of depression in primary care. It was, however, originally designed as a diagnostic screening tool, and not for measuring change in response to antidepressant treatment. Although the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptom...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harrison, Phillippa, Walton, Syndi, Fennema, Diede, Duan, Suqian, Jaeckle, Tanja, Goldsmith, Kimberley, Carr, Ewan, Ashworth, Mark, Young, Allan. H., Zahn, Roland
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8281039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34210374
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.953
_version_ 1783722765653639168
author Harrison, Phillippa
Walton, Syndi
Fennema, Diede
Duan, Suqian
Jaeckle, Tanja
Goldsmith, Kimberley
Carr, Ewan
Ashworth, Mark
Young, Allan. H.
Zahn, Roland
author_facet Harrison, Phillippa
Walton, Syndi
Fennema, Diede
Duan, Suqian
Jaeckle, Tanja
Goldsmith, Kimberley
Carr, Ewan
Ashworth, Mark
Young, Allan. H.
Zahn, Roland
author_sort Harrison, Phillippa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is a widely used measure of depression in primary care. It was, however, originally designed as a diagnostic screening tool, and not for measuring change in response to antidepressant treatment. Although the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomology (QIDS-SR-16) has been extensively validated for outcome measurement, it is poorly adopted in UK primary care, and, although free for clinicians, has licensing restrictions for healthcare organisation use. AIMS: We aimed to develop a modified version of the PHQ-9, the Maudsley Modified PHQ-9 (MM-PHQ-9), for tracking symptom changes in primary care. We tested the measure's validity, reliability and factor structure. METHOD: A sample of 121 participants was recruited across three studies, and comprised 78 participants with major depressive disorder and 43 controls. MM-PHQ-9 scores were compared with the QIDS-SR-16 and Clinical Global Impressions improvement scale, for concurrent validity. Internal consistency of the scale was assessed, and principal component analysis was conducted to determine the items’ factor structure. RESULTS: The MM-PHQ-9 demonstrated good concurrent validity with the QIDS-SR-16, and excellent internal consistency. Sensitivity to change over a 14-week period was d = 0.41 compared with d = 0.61 on the QIDS-SR-16. Concurrent validity between the paper and mobile app versions of the MM-PHQ-9 was r = 0.67. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that the MM-PHQ-9 is a valid and reliable measure of depressive symptoms in paper and mobile app format, although further validation is required. The measure was sensitive to change, demonstrating suitability for use in routine outcome assessment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8281039
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82810392021-07-19 Development and validation of the Maudsley Modified Patient Health Questionnaire (MM-PHQ-9) Harrison, Phillippa Walton, Syndi Fennema, Diede Duan, Suqian Jaeckle, Tanja Goldsmith, Kimberley Carr, Ewan Ashworth, Mark Young, Allan. H. Zahn, Roland BJPsych Open Papers BACKGROUND: The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is a widely used measure of depression in primary care. It was, however, originally designed as a diagnostic screening tool, and not for measuring change in response to antidepressant treatment. Although the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomology (QIDS-SR-16) has been extensively validated for outcome measurement, it is poorly adopted in UK primary care, and, although free for clinicians, has licensing restrictions for healthcare organisation use. AIMS: We aimed to develop a modified version of the PHQ-9, the Maudsley Modified PHQ-9 (MM-PHQ-9), for tracking symptom changes in primary care. We tested the measure's validity, reliability and factor structure. METHOD: A sample of 121 participants was recruited across three studies, and comprised 78 participants with major depressive disorder and 43 controls. MM-PHQ-9 scores were compared with the QIDS-SR-16 and Clinical Global Impressions improvement scale, for concurrent validity. Internal consistency of the scale was assessed, and principal component analysis was conducted to determine the items’ factor structure. RESULTS: The MM-PHQ-9 demonstrated good concurrent validity with the QIDS-SR-16, and excellent internal consistency. Sensitivity to change over a 14-week period was d = 0.41 compared with d = 0.61 on the QIDS-SR-16. Concurrent validity between the paper and mobile app versions of the MM-PHQ-9 was r = 0.67. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that the MM-PHQ-9 is a valid and reliable measure of depressive symptoms in paper and mobile app format, although further validation is required. The measure was sensitive to change, demonstrating suitability for use in routine outcome assessment. Cambridge University Press 2021-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8281039/ /pubmed/34210374 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.953 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Papers
Harrison, Phillippa
Walton, Syndi
Fennema, Diede
Duan, Suqian
Jaeckle, Tanja
Goldsmith, Kimberley
Carr, Ewan
Ashworth, Mark
Young, Allan. H.
Zahn, Roland
Development and validation of the Maudsley Modified Patient Health Questionnaire (MM-PHQ-9)
title Development and validation of the Maudsley Modified Patient Health Questionnaire (MM-PHQ-9)
title_full Development and validation of the Maudsley Modified Patient Health Questionnaire (MM-PHQ-9)
title_fullStr Development and validation of the Maudsley Modified Patient Health Questionnaire (MM-PHQ-9)
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of the Maudsley Modified Patient Health Questionnaire (MM-PHQ-9)
title_short Development and validation of the Maudsley Modified Patient Health Questionnaire (MM-PHQ-9)
title_sort development and validation of the maudsley modified patient health questionnaire (mm-phq-9)
topic Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8281039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34210374
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2021.953
work_keys_str_mv AT harrisonphillippa developmentandvalidationofthemaudsleymodifiedpatienthealthquestionnairemmphq9
AT waltonsyndi developmentandvalidationofthemaudsleymodifiedpatienthealthquestionnairemmphq9
AT fennemadiede developmentandvalidationofthemaudsleymodifiedpatienthealthquestionnairemmphq9
AT duansuqian developmentandvalidationofthemaudsleymodifiedpatienthealthquestionnairemmphq9
AT jaeckletanja developmentandvalidationofthemaudsleymodifiedpatienthealthquestionnairemmphq9
AT goldsmithkimberley developmentandvalidationofthemaudsleymodifiedpatienthealthquestionnairemmphq9
AT carrewan developmentandvalidationofthemaudsleymodifiedpatienthealthquestionnairemmphq9
AT ashworthmark developmentandvalidationofthemaudsleymodifiedpatienthealthquestionnairemmphq9
AT youngallanh developmentandvalidationofthemaudsleymodifiedpatienthealthquestionnairemmphq9
AT zahnroland developmentandvalidationofthemaudsleymodifiedpatienthealthquestionnairemmphq9