Cargando…

Prospective, randomized comparison of two supplemental oxygen methods during gastroscopy with propofol mono-sedation in obese patients

BACKGROUND: Hypoxemia is a common complication in obese patients during gastroscopy with sedation. The Wei nasal jet tube (WNJT) is a new special nasopharyngeal airway with the ability to provide supraglottic jet ventilation and oxygen insufflation via its built-in wall channels. The aim of this stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shao, Liu-Jia-Zi, Hong, Fang-Xiao, Liu, Fu-Kun, Wan, Lei, Xue, Fu-Shan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8281412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34307602
http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i20.5479
_version_ 1783722838351413248
author Shao, Liu-Jia-Zi
Hong, Fang-Xiao
Liu, Fu-Kun
Wan, Lei
Xue, Fu-Shan
author_facet Shao, Liu-Jia-Zi
Hong, Fang-Xiao
Liu, Fu-Kun
Wan, Lei
Xue, Fu-Shan
author_sort Shao, Liu-Jia-Zi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hypoxemia is a common complication in obese patients during gastroscopy with sedation. The Wei nasal jet tube (WNJT) is a new special nasopharyngeal airway with the ability to provide supraglottic jet ventilation and oxygen insufflation via its built-in wall channels. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of the WNJT vs a nasal cannula for supplemental oxygen during gastroscopy with propofol mono-sedation in obese patients. AIM: To compare the efficacy and safety of the WNJT vs a nasal cannula for supplemental oxygen during gastroscopy with propofol mono-sedation in obese patients. METHODS: A total of 103 obese patients with a body mass index of 30 kg/m(2) or more undergoing elective gastroscopy under propofol mono-sedation were randomly assigned to receive supplemental oxygen at 5 L/min through either a WNJT (WNJT group, n = 51) or a nasal cannula (nasal cannula group, n = 52). The lowest pulse oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) and mild and severe hypoxemia during gastroscopy were recorded. The primary outcome was the incidence of hypoxemia. RESULTS: The lowest SpO(2) during gastroscopy with propofol mono-sedation was significantly increased in the WNJT group compared with the nasal cannula group. The incidence of mild hypoxemia and total incidence of hypoxemia were significantly lower in the WNJT group than in the nasal cannula group. Other than a higher incidence of epistaxis in the WNJT group, the occurrence of adverse events was similar between the devices. While neither device demonstrated a statistically significant difference in satisfaction among patients, the WNJT did result in improved satisfaction among anesthetists and physicians. CONCLUSION: During gastroscopy with propofol mono-sedation in obese patients, the WNJT, when compared with a nasal cannula for supplemental oxygen, can significantly reduce the occurrence of hypoxemia and improve both arterial oxygenation and satisfaction among anesthetists and physicians. The use of the WNJT may, however, lead to epistaxis in a few patients. In view of this clinically acceptable risk-benefit ratio, the WNJT may be recommended as an alternative tool for supplemental oxygen for the prevention of hypoxemia during gastroscopy with propofol mono-sedation in obese patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8281412
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82814122021-07-23 Prospective, randomized comparison of two supplemental oxygen methods during gastroscopy with propofol mono-sedation in obese patients Shao, Liu-Jia-Zi Hong, Fang-Xiao Liu, Fu-Kun Wan, Lei Xue, Fu-Shan World J Clin Cases Clinical Trials Study BACKGROUND: Hypoxemia is a common complication in obese patients during gastroscopy with sedation. The Wei nasal jet tube (WNJT) is a new special nasopharyngeal airway with the ability to provide supraglottic jet ventilation and oxygen insufflation via its built-in wall channels. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of the WNJT vs a nasal cannula for supplemental oxygen during gastroscopy with propofol mono-sedation in obese patients. AIM: To compare the efficacy and safety of the WNJT vs a nasal cannula for supplemental oxygen during gastroscopy with propofol mono-sedation in obese patients. METHODS: A total of 103 obese patients with a body mass index of 30 kg/m(2) or more undergoing elective gastroscopy under propofol mono-sedation were randomly assigned to receive supplemental oxygen at 5 L/min through either a WNJT (WNJT group, n = 51) or a nasal cannula (nasal cannula group, n = 52). The lowest pulse oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) and mild and severe hypoxemia during gastroscopy were recorded. The primary outcome was the incidence of hypoxemia. RESULTS: The lowest SpO(2) during gastroscopy with propofol mono-sedation was significantly increased in the WNJT group compared with the nasal cannula group. The incidence of mild hypoxemia and total incidence of hypoxemia were significantly lower in the WNJT group than in the nasal cannula group. Other than a higher incidence of epistaxis in the WNJT group, the occurrence of adverse events was similar between the devices. While neither device demonstrated a statistically significant difference in satisfaction among patients, the WNJT did result in improved satisfaction among anesthetists and physicians. CONCLUSION: During gastroscopy with propofol mono-sedation in obese patients, the WNJT, when compared with a nasal cannula for supplemental oxygen, can significantly reduce the occurrence of hypoxemia and improve both arterial oxygenation and satisfaction among anesthetists and physicians. The use of the WNJT may, however, lead to epistaxis in a few patients. In view of this clinically acceptable risk-benefit ratio, the WNJT may be recommended as an alternative tool for supplemental oxygen for the prevention of hypoxemia during gastroscopy with propofol mono-sedation in obese patients. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2021-07-16 2021-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8281412/ /pubmed/34307602 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i20.5479 Text en ©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Clinical Trials Study
Shao, Liu-Jia-Zi
Hong, Fang-Xiao
Liu, Fu-Kun
Wan, Lei
Xue, Fu-Shan
Prospective, randomized comparison of two supplemental oxygen methods during gastroscopy with propofol mono-sedation in obese patients
title Prospective, randomized comparison of two supplemental oxygen methods during gastroscopy with propofol mono-sedation in obese patients
title_full Prospective, randomized comparison of two supplemental oxygen methods during gastroscopy with propofol mono-sedation in obese patients
title_fullStr Prospective, randomized comparison of two supplemental oxygen methods during gastroscopy with propofol mono-sedation in obese patients
title_full_unstemmed Prospective, randomized comparison of two supplemental oxygen methods during gastroscopy with propofol mono-sedation in obese patients
title_short Prospective, randomized comparison of two supplemental oxygen methods during gastroscopy with propofol mono-sedation in obese patients
title_sort prospective, randomized comparison of two supplemental oxygen methods during gastroscopy with propofol mono-sedation in obese patients
topic Clinical Trials Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8281412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34307602
http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i20.5479
work_keys_str_mv AT shaoliujiazi prospectiverandomizedcomparisonoftwosupplementaloxygenmethodsduringgastroscopywithpropofolmonosedationinobesepatients
AT hongfangxiao prospectiverandomizedcomparisonoftwosupplementaloxygenmethodsduringgastroscopywithpropofolmonosedationinobesepatients
AT liufukun prospectiverandomizedcomparisonoftwosupplementaloxygenmethodsduringgastroscopywithpropofolmonosedationinobesepatients
AT wanlei prospectiverandomizedcomparisonoftwosupplementaloxygenmethodsduringgastroscopywithpropofolmonosedationinobesepatients
AT xuefushan prospectiverandomizedcomparisonoftwosupplementaloxygenmethodsduringgastroscopywithpropofolmonosedationinobesepatients