Cargando…

Intraperitoneal migration of an intrauterine device (IUD): A case report

INTRODUCTION: The IUD is one of the most widely used reversible, long-term contraceptive methods in the world. About 80% of IUDs are found in the peritoneal cavity after uterine perforation. CASE REPORT: A 27-year-old female patient presented with chronic pelvic pain with minimal metrorrhagia for 8...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Benaguida, Hicham, Kiram, Hamza, Telmoudi, Ely Cheikh, Ouafidi, Btissam, Benhessou, Mustapha, Ennachit, Mohamed, Elkarroumi, Mohamed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8281585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34295465
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102547
_version_ 1783722856864022528
author Benaguida, Hicham
Kiram, Hamza
Telmoudi, Ely Cheikh
Ouafidi, Btissam
Benhessou, Mustapha
Ennachit, Mohamed
Elkarroumi, Mohamed
author_facet Benaguida, Hicham
Kiram, Hamza
Telmoudi, Ely Cheikh
Ouafidi, Btissam
Benhessou, Mustapha
Ennachit, Mohamed
Elkarroumi, Mohamed
author_sort Benaguida, Hicham
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The IUD is one of the most widely used reversible, long-term contraceptive methods in the world. About 80% of IUDs are found in the peritoneal cavity after uterine perforation. CASE REPORT: A 27-year-old female patient presented with chronic pelvic pain with minimal metrorrhagia for 8 months on IUD. On examination, there was no IUD thread. Pelvic ultrasound showed a hypoechoic, heterogeneous, poorly limited formation measuring 3 × 2.68 cm. Abdominal-pelvic CT scan showed hyperdense supravesical material surrounded by a hypo-dense, well-limited collection measuring 26 × 25 mm. Laparoscopy showed an anterior peritoneal collection above the bladder containing the IUD, a uterus, adnexa, and a bladder without abnormality. The IUD was removed after incision of the collection and aspiration of the pus. DISCUSSION: The IUD is one of the most widely used long-term reversible contraceptive methods in the world. But like any foreign body, it can present complications, notably migration after uterine perforation, which remains rare, and even rarer peritoneal localization. The clinical diagnosis is not always obvious, and additional examinations are necessary to locate the device, including endovaginal ultrasound, a CT scan or magnetic resonance imaging. WHO recommends surgical removal of the migrated IUD by minimally invasive methods, including hysteroscopy, cystoscopy, colonoscopy, or laparoscopy, depending on the location of the IUD. CONCLUSION: IUDs are effective contraceptive measures, and the majority of patients with uterine perforation by IUD migration are asymptomatic. Diagnosis is based on a thorough gynecologic analysis and appropriate radiologic imaging.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8281585
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82815852021-07-21 Intraperitoneal migration of an intrauterine device (IUD): A case report Benaguida, Hicham Kiram, Hamza Telmoudi, Ely Cheikh Ouafidi, Btissam Benhessou, Mustapha Ennachit, Mohamed Elkarroumi, Mohamed Ann Med Surg (Lond) Case Report INTRODUCTION: The IUD is one of the most widely used reversible, long-term contraceptive methods in the world. About 80% of IUDs are found in the peritoneal cavity after uterine perforation. CASE REPORT: A 27-year-old female patient presented with chronic pelvic pain with minimal metrorrhagia for 8 months on IUD. On examination, there was no IUD thread. Pelvic ultrasound showed a hypoechoic, heterogeneous, poorly limited formation measuring 3 × 2.68 cm. Abdominal-pelvic CT scan showed hyperdense supravesical material surrounded by a hypo-dense, well-limited collection measuring 26 × 25 mm. Laparoscopy showed an anterior peritoneal collection above the bladder containing the IUD, a uterus, adnexa, and a bladder without abnormality. The IUD was removed after incision of the collection and aspiration of the pus. DISCUSSION: The IUD is one of the most widely used long-term reversible contraceptive methods in the world. But like any foreign body, it can present complications, notably migration after uterine perforation, which remains rare, and even rarer peritoneal localization. The clinical diagnosis is not always obvious, and additional examinations are necessary to locate the device, including endovaginal ultrasound, a CT scan or magnetic resonance imaging. WHO recommends surgical removal of the migrated IUD by minimally invasive methods, including hysteroscopy, cystoscopy, colonoscopy, or laparoscopy, depending on the location of the IUD. CONCLUSION: IUDs are effective contraceptive measures, and the majority of patients with uterine perforation by IUD migration are asymptomatic. Diagnosis is based on a thorough gynecologic analysis and appropriate radiologic imaging. Elsevier 2021-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8281585/ /pubmed/34295465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102547 Text en © 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of IJS Publishing Group Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Case Report
Benaguida, Hicham
Kiram, Hamza
Telmoudi, Ely Cheikh
Ouafidi, Btissam
Benhessou, Mustapha
Ennachit, Mohamed
Elkarroumi, Mohamed
Intraperitoneal migration of an intrauterine device (IUD): A case report
title Intraperitoneal migration of an intrauterine device (IUD): A case report
title_full Intraperitoneal migration of an intrauterine device (IUD): A case report
title_fullStr Intraperitoneal migration of an intrauterine device (IUD): A case report
title_full_unstemmed Intraperitoneal migration of an intrauterine device (IUD): A case report
title_short Intraperitoneal migration of an intrauterine device (IUD): A case report
title_sort intraperitoneal migration of an intrauterine device (iud): a case report
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8281585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34295465
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102547
work_keys_str_mv AT benaguidahicham intraperitonealmigrationofanintrauterinedeviceiudacasereport
AT kiramhamza intraperitonealmigrationofanintrauterinedeviceiudacasereport
AT telmoudielycheikh intraperitonealmigrationofanintrauterinedeviceiudacasereport
AT ouafidibtissam intraperitonealmigrationofanintrauterinedeviceiudacasereport
AT benhessoumustapha intraperitonealmigrationofanintrauterinedeviceiudacasereport
AT ennachitmohamed intraperitonealmigrationofanintrauterinedeviceiudacasereport
AT elkarroumimohamed intraperitonealmigrationofanintrauterinedeviceiudacasereport