Cargando…

Atomic force microscopy comparative analysis of the surface roughness of two posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens models: ICL versus IPCL

BACKGROUND: To compare the anterior surface roughness of two commercially available posterior chamber phakic intraocular lenses (IOLs) using atomic force microscopy (AFM). METHODS: Four phakic IOLs were used for this prospective, experimental study: two Visian ICL EVO+ V5 lenses and two iPCL 2.0 len...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gros-Otero, Juan, Ketabi, Samira, Cañones-Zafra, Rafael, Garcia-Gonzalez, Montserrat, Villa-Collar, Cesar, Casado, Santiago, Teus, Miguel A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8281652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34261440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-021-02039-6
_version_ 1783722869349416960
author Gros-Otero, Juan
Ketabi, Samira
Cañones-Zafra, Rafael
Garcia-Gonzalez, Montserrat
Villa-Collar, Cesar
Casado, Santiago
Teus, Miguel A.
author_facet Gros-Otero, Juan
Ketabi, Samira
Cañones-Zafra, Rafael
Garcia-Gonzalez, Montserrat
Villa-Collar, Cesar
Casado, Santiago
Teus, Miguel A.
author_sort Gros-Otero, Juan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To compare the anterior surface roughness of two commercially available posterior chamber phakic intraocular lenses (IOLs) using atomic force microscopy (AFM). METHODS: Four phakic IOLs were used for this prospective, experimental study: two Visian ICL EVO+ V5 lenses and two iPCL 2.0 lenses. All of them were brand new, were not previously implanted in humans, were monofocal and had a dioptric power of − 12 diopters (D). The anterior surface roughness was assessed using a JPK NanoWizard II® atomic force microscope in contact mode immersed in liquid. Olympus OMCL-RC800PSA commercial silicon nitride cantilever tips were used. Anterior surface roughness measurements were made in 7 areas of 10 × 10 μm at 512 × 512 point resolution. The roughness was measured using the root-mean-square (RMS) value within the given regions. RESULTS: The mean of all anterior surface roughness measurements was 6.09 ± 1.33 nm (nm) in the Visian ICL EVO+ V5 and 3.49 ± 0.41 nm in the iPCL 2.0 (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: In the current study, we found a statistically significant smoother anterior surface in the iPCL 2.0 phakic intraocular lenses compared with the VISIAN ICL EVO+ V5 lenses when studied with atomic force microscopy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8281652
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82816522021-07-16 Atomic force microscopy comparative analysis of the surface roughness of two posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens models: ICL versus IPCL Gros-Otero, Juan Ketabi, Samira Cañones-Zafra, Rafael Garcia-Gonzalez, Montserrat Villa-Collar, Cesar Casado, Santiago Teus, Miguel A. BMC Ophthalmol Research BACKGROUND: To compare the anterior surface roughness of two commercially available posterior chamber phakic intraocular lenses (IOLs) using atomic force microscopy (AFM). METHODS: Four phakic IOLs were used for this prospective, experimental study: two Visian ICL EVO+ V5 lenses and two iPCL 2.0 lenses. All of them were brand new, were not previously implanted in humans, were monofocal and had a dioptric power of − 12 diopters (D). The anterior surface roughness was assessed using a JPK NanoWizard II® atomic force microscope in contact mode immersed in liquid. Olympus OMCL-RC800PSA commercial silicon nitride cantilever tips were used. Anterior surface roughness measurements were made in 7 areas of 10 × 10 μm at 512 × 512 point resolution. The roughness was measured using the root-mean-square (RMS) value within the given regions. RESULTS: The mean of all anterior surface roughness measurements was 6.09 ± 1.33 nm (nm) in the Visian ICL EVO+ V5 and 3.49 ± 0.41 nm in the iPCL 2.0 (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: In the current study, we found a statistically significant smoother anterior surface in the iPCL 2.0 phakic intraocular lenses compared with the VISIAN ICL EVO+ V5 lenses when studied with atomic force microscopy. BioMed Central 2021-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8281652/ /pubmed/34261440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-021-02039-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Gros-Otero, Juan
Ketabi, Samira
Cañones-Zafra, Rafael
Garcia-Gonzalez, Montserrat
Villa-Collar, Cesar
Casado, Santiago
Teus, Miguel A.
Atomic force microscopy comparative analysis of the surface roughness of two posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens models: ICL versus IPCL
title Atomic force microscopy comparative analysis of the surface roughness of two posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens models: ICL versus IPCL
title_full Atomic force microscopy comparative analysis of the surface roughness of two posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens models: ICL versus IPCL
title_fullStr Atomic force microscopy comparative analysis of the surface roughness of two posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens models: ICL versus IPCL
title_full_unstemmed Atomic force microscopy comparative analysis of the surface roughness of two posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens models: ICL versus IPCL
title_short Atomic force microscopy comparative analysis of the surface roughness of two posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens models: ICL versus IPCL
title_sort atomic force microscopy comparative analysis of the surface roughness of two posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens models: icl versus ipcl
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8281652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34261440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-021-02039-6
work_keys_str_mv AT grosoterojuan atomicforcemicroscopycomparativeanalysisofthesurfaceroughnessoftwoposteriorchamberphakicintraocularlensmodelsiclversusipcl
AT ketabisamira atomicforcemicroscopycomparativeanalysisofthesurfaceroughnessoftwoposteriorchamberphakicintraocularlensmodelsiclversusipcl
AT canoneszafrarafael atomicforcemicroscopycomparativeanalysisofthesurfaceroughnessoftwoposteriorchamberphakicintraocularlensmodelsiclversusipcl
AT garciagonzalezmontserrat atomicforcemicroscopycomparativeanalysisofthesurfaceroughnessoftwoposteriorchamberphakicintraocularlensmodelsiclversusipcl
AT villacollarcesar atomicforcemicroscopycomparativeanalysisofthesurfaceroughnessoftwoposteriorchamberphakicintraocularlensmodelsiclversusipcl
AT casadosantiago atomicforcemicroscopycomparativeanalysisofthesurfaceroughnessoftwoposteriorchamberphakicintraocularlensmodelsiclversusipcl
AT teusmiguela atomicforcemicroscopycomparativeanalysisofthesurfaceroughnessoftwoposteriorchamberphakicintraocularlensmodelsiclversusipcl