Cargando…

Differences between TNM classification and 2-[(18)F]FDG PET parameters of primary tumor in NSCLC patients

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to compare the TNM classification with 2-[(18)F]FDG PE T biological parameters of primary tumor in patients with NSCLC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis was performed on a group of 79 newly diagnosed NSCLC patients. PET scans were acquired on Gemini...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cegla, Paulina, Bryl, Maciej, Witkowska, Kamila, Bos-Liedke, Agnieszka, Pietrasz, Katarzyna, Kycler, Witold, Malicki, Julian, Piotrowski, Tomasz, Czepczyński, Rafał
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Via Medica 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8281901/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34277098
http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/RPOR.a2021.0072
_version_ 1783722909238296576
author Cegla, Paulina
Bryl, Maciej
Witkowska, Kamila
Bos-Liedke, Agnieszka
Pietrasz, Katarzyna
Kycler, Witold
Malicki, Julian
Piotrowski, Tomasz
Czepczyński, Rafał
author_facet Cegla, Paulina
Bryl, Maciej
Witkowska, Kamila
Bos-Liedke, Agnieszka
Pietrasz, Katarzyna
Kycler, Witold
Malicki, Julian
Piotrowski, Tomasz
Czepczyński, Rafał
author_sort Cegla, Paulina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to compare the TNM classification with 2-[(18)F]FDG PE T biological parameters of primary tumor in patients with NSCLC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis was performed on a group of 79 newly diagnosed NSCLC patients. PET scans were acquired on Gemini TF PET/CT scanner 60–70 min after injection of 2-[(18)F]FDG with the mean activity of 364 ± 75 MBq, with the area being examined from the vertex to mid-thigh. The reconstructed PET images were evaluated using MIM 7.0 Software for SUV(max), MTV and TLG values. RESULTS: The analysis of the cancer stage according to TNM 8(th) edition showed stage IA2 in 8 patients, stage IA3 — 6 patients, stage IB — 4 patients, IIA — 3 patients, 15 patients with stage IIB, stage IIIA — 17 patients, IIIB — 5, IIIC — 5, IVA in 7 patients and stage IVB in 9 patients. The lowest TLG values of primary tumor were observed in stage IA2 (11.31 ± 15.27) and the highest in stage IIIC (1003.20 ± 953.59). The lowest value of primary tumor in SUV(max) and MTV were found in stage IA2 (6.8 ± 3.8 and 1.37 ± 0.42, respectively), while the highest SUV(max) of primary tumor was found in stage IIA (13.4 ± 11.4) and MTV in stage IIIC (108.15 ± 127.24). CONCLUSION: TNM stages are characterized by different primary tumor 2-[(18)F]FDG PET parameters, which might complement patient outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8281901
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Via Medica
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82819012021-07-16 Differences between TNM classification and 2-[(18)F]FDG PET parameters of primary tumor in NSCLC patients Cegla, Paulina Bryl, Maciej Witkowska, Kamila Bos-Liedke, Agnieszka Pietrasz, Katarzyna Kycler, Witold Malicki, Julian Piotrowski, Tomasz Czepczyński, Rafał Rep Pract Oncol Radiother Research Paper BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to compare the TNM classification with 2-[(18)F]FDG PE T biological parameters of primary tumor in patients with NSCLC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis was performed on a group of 79 newly diagnosed NSCLC patients. PET scans were acquired on Gemini TF PET/CT scanner 60–70 min after injection of 2-[(18)F]FDG with the mean activity of 364 ± 75 MBq, with the area being examined from the vertex to mid-thigh. The reconstructed PET images were evaluated using MIM 7.0 Software for SUV(max), MTV and TLG values. RESULTS: The analysis of the cancer stage according to TNM 8(th) edition showed stage IA2 in 8 patients, stage IA3 — 6 patients, stage IB — 4 patients, IIA — 3 patients, 15 patients with stage IIB, stage IIIA — 17 patients, IIIB — 5, IIIC — 5, IVA in 7 patients and stage IVB in 9 patients. The lowest TLG values of primary tumor were observed in stage IA2 (11.31 ± 15.27) and the highest in stage IIIC (1003.20 ± 953.59). The lowest value of primary tumor in SUV(max) and MTV were found in stage IA2 (6.8 ± 3.8 and 1.37 ± 0.42, respectively), while the highest SUV(max) of primary tumor was found in stage IIA (13.4 ± 11.4) and MTV in stage IIIC (108.15 ± 127.24). CONCLUSION: TNM stages are characterized by different primary tumor 2-[(18)F]FDG PET parameters, which might complement patient outcome. Via Medica 2021-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8281901/ /pubmed/34277098 http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/RPOR.a2021.0072 Text en © 2021 Greater Poland Cancer Centre https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is available in open access under Creative Common Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ) license, allowing to download articles and share them with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially
spellingShingle Research Paper
Cegla, Paulina
Bryl, Maciej
Witkowska, Kamila
Bos-Liedke, Agnieszka
Pietrasz, Katarzyna
Kycler, Witold
Malicki, Julian
Piotrowski, Tomasz
Czepczyński, Rafał
Differences between TNM classification and 2-[(18)F]FDG PET parameters of primary tumor in NSCLC patients
title Differences between TNM classification and 2-[(18)F]FDG PET parameters of primary tumor in NSCLC patients
title_full Differences between TNM classification and 2-[(18)F]FDG PET parameters of primary tumor in NSCLC patients
title_fullStr Differences between TNM classification and 2-[(18)F]FDG PET parameters of primary tumor in NSCLC patients
title_full_unstemmed Differences between TNM classification and 2-[(18)F]FDG PET parameters of primary tumor in NSCLC patients
title_short Differences between TNM classification and 2-[(18)F]FDG PET parameters of primary tumor in NSCLC patients
title_sort differences between tnm classification and 2-[(18)f]fdg pet parameters of primary tumor in nsclc patients
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8281901/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34277098
http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/RPOR.a2021.0072
work_keys_str_mv AT ceglapaulina differencesbetweentnmclassificationand218ffdgpetparametersofprimarytumorinnsclcpatients
AT brylmaciej differencesbetweentnmclassificationand218ffdgpetparametersofprimarytumorinnsclcpatients
AT witkowskakamila differencesbetweentnmclassificationand218ffdgpetparametersofprimarytumorinnsclcpatients
AT bosliedkeagnieszka differencesbetweentnmclassificationand218ffdgpetparametersofprimarytumorinnsclcpatients
AT pietraszkatarzyna differencesbetweentnmclassificationand218ffdgpetparametersofprimarytumorinnsclcpatients
AT kyclerwitold differencesbetweentnmclassificationand218ffdgpetparametersofprimarytumorinnsclcpatients
AT malickijulian differencesbetweentnmclassificationand218ffdgpetparametersofprimarytumorinnsclcpatients
AT piotrowskitomasz differencesbetweentnmclassificationand218ffdgpetparametersofprimarytumorinnsclcpatients
AT czepczynskirafał differencesbetweentnmclassificationand218ffdgpetparametersofprimarytumorinnsclcpatients