Cargando…

Predicting performance in 4 x 200-m freestyle swimming relay events

AIM: The aim was to predict and understand variations in swimmer performance between individual and relay events, and develop a predictive model for the 4x200-m swimming freestyle relay event to help inform team selection and strategy. DATA AND METHODS: Race data for 716 relay finals (4 x 200-m free...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Paul Pao-Yen, Babaei, Toktam, O’Shea, Michael, Mengersen, Kerrie, Drovandi, Christopher, McGibbon, Katie E., Pyne, David B., Mitchell, Lachlan J. G., Osborne, Mark A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8282077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34265006
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254538
_version_ 1783722943645220864
author Wu, Paul Pao-Yen
Babaei, Toktam
O’Shea, Michael
Mengersen, Kerrie
Drovandi, Christopher
McGibbon, Katie E.
Pyne, David B.
Mitchell, Lachlan J. G.
Osborne, Mark A.
author_facet Wu, Paul Pao-Yen
Babaei, Toktam
O’Shea, Michael
Mengersen, Kerrie
Drovandi, Christopher
McGibbon, Katie E.
Pyne, David B.
Mitchell, Lachlan J. G.
Osborne, Mark A.
author_sort Wu, Paul Pao-Yen
collection PubMed
description AIM: The aim was to predict and understand variations in swimmer performance between individual and relay events, and develop a predictive model for the 4x200-m swimming freestyle relay event to help inform team selection and strategy. DATA AND METHODS: Race data for 716 relay finals (4 x 200-m freestyle) from 14 international competitions between 2010–2018 were analysed. Individual 200-m freestyle season best time for the same year was located for each swimmer. Linear regression and machine learning was applied to 4 x 200-m swimming freestyle relay events. RESULTS: Compared to the individual event, the lowest ranked swimmer in the team (-0.62 s, CI = [−0.94, −0.30]) and American swimmers (−0.48 s [−0.89, −0.08]) typically swam faster 200-m times in relay events. Random forest models predicted gold, silver, bronze and non-medal with 100%, up to 41%, up to 63%, and 93% sensitivity, respectively. DISCUSSION: Team finishing position was strongly associated with the differential time to the fastest team (mean decrease in Gini (MDG) when this variable was omitted = 31.3), world rankings of team members (average ranking MDG of 18.9), and the order of swimmers (MDG = 6.9). Differential times are based on the sum of individual swimmer’s season’s best times, and along with world rankings, reflect team strength. In contrast, the order of swimmers reflects strategy. This type of analysis could assist coaches and support staff in selecting swimmers and team orders for relay events to enhance the likelihood of success.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8282077
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82820772021-07-28 Predicting performance in 4 x 200-m freestyle swimming relay events Wu, Paul Pao-Yen Babaei, Toktam O’Shea, Michael Mengersen, Kerrie Drovandi, Christopher McGibbon, Katie E. Pyne, David B. Mitchell, Lachlan J. G. Osborne, Mark A. PLoS One Research Article AIM: The aim was to predict and understand variations in swimmer performance between individual and relay events, and develop a predictive model for the 4x200-m swimming freestyle relay event to help inform team selection and strategy. DATA AND METHODS: Race data for 716 relay finals (4 x 200-m freestyle) from 14 international competitions between 2010–2018 were analysed. Individual 200-m freestyle season best time for the same year was located for each swimmer. Linear regression and machine learning was applied to 4 x 200-m swimming freestyle relay events. RESULTS: Compared to the individual event, the lowest ranked swimmer in the team (-0.62 s, CI = [−0.94, −0.30]) and American swimmers (−0.48 s [−0.89, −0.08]) typically swam faster 200-m times in relay events. Random forest models predicted gold, silver, bronze and non-medal with 100%, up to 41%, up to 63%, and 93% sensitivity, respectively. DISCUSSION: Team finishing position was strongly associated with the differential time to the fastest team (mean decrease in Gini (MDG) when this variable was omitted = 31.3), world rankings of team members (average ranking MDG of 18.9), and the order of swimmers (MDG = 6.9). Differential times are based on the sum of individual swimmer’s season’s best times, and along with world rankings, reflect team strength. In contrast, the order of swimmers reflects strategy. This type of analysis could assist coaches and support staff in selecting swimmers and team orders for relay events to enhance the likelihood of success. Public Library of Science 2021-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8282077/ /pubmed/34265006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254538 Text en © 2021 Wu et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wu, Paul Pao-Yen
Babaei, Toktam
O’Shea, Michael
Mengersen, Kerrie
Drovandi, Christopher
McGibbon, Katie E.
Pyne, David B.
Mitchell, Lachlan J. G.
Osborne, Mark A.
Predicting performance in 4 x 200-m freestyle swimming relay events
title Predicting performance in 4 x 200-m freestyle swimming relay events
title_full Predicting performance in 4 x 200-m freestyle swimming relay events
title_fullStr Predicting performance in 4 x 200-m freestyle swimming relay events
title_full_unstemmed Predicting performance in 4 x 200-m freestyle swimming relay events
title_short Predicting performance in 4 x 200-m freestyle swimming relay events
title_sort predicting performance in 4 x 200-m freestyle swimming relay events
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8282077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34265006
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254538
work_keys_str_mv AT wupaulpaoyen predictingperformancein4x200mfreestyleswimmingrelayevents
AT babaeitoktam predictingperformancein4x200mfreestyleswimmingrelayevents
AT osheamichael predictingperformancein4x200mfreestyleswimmingrelayevents
AT mengersenkerrie predictingperformancein4x200mfreestyleswimmingrelayevents
AT drovandichristopher predictingperformancein4x200mfreestyleswimmingrelayevents
AT mcgibbonkatiee predictingperformancein4x200mfreestyleswimmingrelayevents
AT pynedavidb predictingperformancein4x200mfreestyleswimmingrelayevents
AT mitchelllachlanjg predictingperformancein4x200mfreestyleswimmingrelayevents
AT osbornemarka predictingperformancein4x200mfreestyleswimmingrelayevents