Cargando…
Predicting performance in 4 x 200-m freestyle swimming relay events
AIM: The aim was to predict and understand variations in swimmer performance between individual and relay events, and develop a predictive model for the 4x200-m swimming freestyle relay event to help inform team selection and strategy. DATA AND METHODS: Race data for 716 relay finals (4 x 200-m free...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8282077/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34265006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254538 |
_version_ | 1783722943645220864 |
---|---|
author | Wu, Paul Pao-Yen Babaei, Toktam O’Shea, Michael Mengersen, Kerrie Drovandi, Christopher McGibbon, Katie E. Pyne, David B. Mitchell, Lachlan J. G. Osborne, Mark A. |
author_facet | Wu, Paul Pao-Yen Babaei, Toktam O’Shea, Michael Mengersen, Kerrie Drovandi, Christopher McGibbon, Katie E. Pyne, David B. Mitchell, Lachlan J. G. Osborne, Mark A. |
author_sort | Wu, Paul Pao-Yen |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: The aim was to predict and understand variations in swimmer performance between individual and relay events, and develop a predictive model for the 4x200-m swimming freestyle relay event to help inform team selection and strategy. DATA AND METHODS: Race data for 716 relay finals (4 x 200-m freestyle) from 14 international competitions between 2010–2018 were analysed. Individual 200-m freestyle season best time for the same year was located for each swimmer. Linear regression and machine learning was applied to 4 x 200-m swimming freestyle relay events. RESULTS: Compared to the individual event, the lowest ranked swimmer in the team (-0.62 s, CI = [−0.94, −0.30]) and American swimmers (−0.48 s [−0.89, −0.08]) typically swam faster 200-m times in relay events. Random forest models predicted gold, silver, bronze and non-medal with 100%, up to 41%, up to 63%, and 93% sensitivity, respectively. DISCUSSION: Team finishing position was strongly associated with the differential time to the fastest team (mean decrease in Gini (MDG) when this variable was omitted = 31.3), world rankings of team members (average ranking MDG of 18.9), and the order of swimmers (MDG = 6.9). Differential times are based on the sum of individual swimmer’s season’s best times, and along with world rankings, reflect team strength. In contrast, the order of swimmers reflects strategy. This type of analysis could assist coaches and support staff in selecting swimmers and team orders for relay events to enhance the likelihood of success. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8282077 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82820772021-07-28 Predicting performance in 4 x 200-m freestyle swimming relay events Wu, Paul Pao-Yen Babaei, Toktam O’Shea, Michael Mengersen, Kerrie Drovandi, Christopher McGibbon, Katie E. Pyne, David B. Mitchell, Lachlan J. G. Osborne, Mark A. PLoS One Research Article AIM: The aim was to predict and understand variations in swimmer performance between individual and relay events, and develop a predictive model for the 4x200-m swimming freestyle relay event to help inform team selection and strategy. DATA AND METHODS: Race data for 716 relay finals (4 x 200-m freestyle) from 14 international competitions between 2010–2018 were analysed. Individual 200-m freestyle season best time for the same year was located for each swimmer. Linear regression and machine learning was applied to 4 x 200-m swimming freestyle relay events. RESULTS: Compared to the individual event, the lowest ranked swimmer in the team (-0.62 s, CI = [−0.94, −0.30]) and American swimmers (−0.48 s [−0.89, −0.08]) typically swam faster 200-m times in relay events. Random forest models predicted gold, silver, bronze and non-medal with 100%, up to 41%, up to 63%, and 93% sensitivity, respectively. DISCUSSION: Team finishing position was strongly associated with the differential time to the fastest team (mean decrease in Gini (MDG) when this variable was omitted = 31.3), world rankings of team members (average ranking MDG of 18.9), and the order of swimmers (MDG = 6.9). Differential times are based on the sum of individual swimmer’s season’s best times, and along with world rankings, reflect team strength. In contrast, the order of swimmers reflects strategy. This type of analysis could assist coaches and support staff in selecting swimmers and team orders for relay events to enhance the likelihood of success. Public Library of Science 2021-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8282077/ /pubmed/34265006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254538 Text en © 2021 Wu et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wu, Paul Pao-Yen Babaei, Toktam O’Shea, Michael Mengersen, Kerrie Drovandi, Christopher McGibbon, Katie E. Pyne, David B. Mitchell, Lachlan J. G. Osborne, Mark A. Predicting performance in 4 x 200-m freestyle swimming relay events |
title | Predicting performance in 4 x 200-m freestyle swimming relay events |
title_full | Predicting performance in 4 x 200-m freestyle swimming relay events |
title_fullStr | Predicting performance in 4 x 200-m freestyle swimming relay events |
title_full_unstemmed | Predicting performance in 4 x 200-m freestyle swimming relay events |
title_short | Predicting performance in 4 x 200-m freestyle swimming relay events |
title_sort | predicting performance in 4 x 200-m freestyle swimming relay events |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8282077/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34265006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254538 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wupaulpaoyen predictingperformancein4x200mfreestyleswimmingrelayevents AT babaeitoktam predictingperformancein4x200mfreestyleswimmingrelayevents AT osheamichael predictingperformancein4x200mfreestyleswimmingrelayevents AT mengersenkerrie predictingperformancein4x200mfreestyleswimmingrelayevents AT drovandichristopher predictingperformancein4x200mfreestyleswimmingrelayevents AT mcgibbonkatiee predictingperformancein4x200mfreestyleswimmingrelayevents AT pynedavidb predictingperformancein4x200mfreestyleswimmingrelayevents AT mitchelllachlanjg predictingperformancein4x200mfreestyleswimmingrelayevents AT osbornemarka predictingperformancein4x200mfreestyleswimmingrelayevents |