Cargando…

A New Method for Measuring Glenoid Version on Standard Magnetic Resonance Imaging

BACKGROUND: The most effective method and modality for measuring glenoid version for different shoulder conditions is uncertain. Computed tomography (CT) imaging exposes the patient to radiation, and standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) does not consistently image the entire scapula. This study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maister, Nicholas J., Hely, Andrew, Twycross, Liam G., Gill, Stephen D., Page, Richard S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8282165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34497961
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2471549220926826
_version_ 1783722960786292736
author Maister, Nicholas J.
Hely, Andrew
Twycross, Liam G.
Gill, Stephen D.
Page, Richard S.
author_facet Maister, Nicholas J.
Hely, Andrew
Twycross, Liam G.
Gill, Stephen D.
Page, Richard S.
author_sort Maister, Nicholas J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The most effective method and modality for measuring glenoid version for different shoulder conditions is uncertain. Computed tomography (CT) imaging exposes the patient to radiation, and standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) does not consistently image the entire scapula. This study investigates the reliability of a new method for assessing glenoid version using routine shoulder MRI. METHODS: MRI images of 20 patients undergoing arthroscopy for shoulder instability were independently assessed by 3 clinicians for osseous and chondrolabral glenoid version. To assess glenoid version, a line was drawn from medial corner of the glenoid body to midpoint of the glenoid face. A line perpendicular to this was the reference against which to measure glenoid version. Measurements were repeated after 3 months to assess intra- and interobserver reliability. Reliability was determined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). RESULTS: Interclass correlation coefficients showed at least good reliability for most estimates of intraobserver reliability (ICC ≥ .66) and excellent reliability for most estimates of interobserver reliability (ICC ≥ .84), with the exception of some inferior glenoid measurements where ICC was poor (ICC ≤.41). DISCUSSION: We propose that this new method of measuring glenoid on standard axial MRI can be used as a simple, practical, and reliable method in shoulder instability patients, which will reduce the requirement for CT in this group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8282165
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82821652021-09-07 A New Method for Measuring Glenoid Version on Standard Magnetic Resonance Imaging Maister, Nicholas J. Hely, Andrew Twycross, Liam G. Gill, Stephen D. Page, Richard S. J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast Original Scientific Research BACKGROUND: The most effective method and modality for measuring glenoid version for different shoulder conditions is uncertain. Computed tomography (CT) imaging exposes the patient to radiation, and standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) does not consistently image the entire scapula. This study investigates the reliability of a new method for assessing glenoid version using routine shoulder MRI. METHODS: MRI images of 20 patients undergoing arthroscopy for shoulder instability were independently assessed by 3 clinicians for osseous and chondrolabral glenoid version. To assess glenoid version, a line was drawn from medial corner of the glenoid body to midpoint of the glenoid face. A line perpendicular to this was the reference against which to measure glenoid version. Measurements were repeated after 3 months to assess intra- and interobserver reliability. Reliability was determined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). RESULTS: Interclass correlation coefficients showed at least good reliability for most estimates of intraobserver reliability (ICC ≥ .66) and excellent reliability for most estimates of interobserver reliability (ICC ≥ .84), with the exception of some inferior glenoid measurements where ICC was poor (ICC ≤.41). DISCUSSION: We propose that this new method of measuring glenoid on standard axial MRI can be used as a simple, practical, and reliable method in shoulder instability patients, which will reduce the requirement for CT in this group. SAGE Publications 2020-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8282165/ /pubmed/34497961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2471549220926826 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Scientific Research
Maister, Nicholas J.
Hely, Andrew
Twycross, Liam G.
Gill, Stephen D.
Page, Richard S.
A New Method for Measuring Glenoid Version on Standard Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title A New Method for Measuring Glenoid Version on Standard Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_full A New Method for Measuring Glenoid Version on Standard Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_fullStr A New Method for Measuring Glenoid Version on Standard Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_full_unstemmed A New Method for Measuring Glenoid Version on Standard Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_short A New Method for Measuring Glenoid Version on Standard Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_sort new method for measuring glenoid version on standard magnetic resonance imaging
topic Original Scientific Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8282165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34497961
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2471549220926826
work_keys_str_mv AT maisternicholasj anewmethodformeasuringglenoidversiononstandardmagneticresonanceimaging
AT helyandrew anewmethodformeasuringglenoidversiononstandardmagneticresonanceimaging
AT twycrossliamg anewmethodformeasuringglenoidversiononstandardmagneticresonanceimaging
AT gillstephend anewmethodformeasuringglenoidversiononstandardmagneticresonanceimaging
AT pagerichards anewmethodformeasuringglenoidversiononstandardmagneticresonanceimaging
AT maisternicholasj newmethodformeasuringglenoidversiononstandardmagneticresonanceimaging
AT helyandrew newmethodformeasuringglenoidversiononstandardmagneticresonanceimaging
AT twycrossliamg newmethodformeasuringglenoidversiononstandardmagneticresonanceimaging
AT gillstephend newmethodformeasuringglenoidversiononstandardmagneticresonanceimaging
AT pagerichards newmethodformeasuringglenoidversiononstandardmagneticresonanceimaging