Cargando…
A New Method for Measuring Glenoid Version on Standard Magnetic Resonance Imaging
BACKGROUND: The most effective method and modality for measuring glenoid version for different shoulder conditions is uncertain. Computed tomography (CT) imaging exposes the patient to radiation, and standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) does not consistently image the entire scapula. This study...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8282165/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34497961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2471549220926826 |
_version_ | 1783722960786292736 |
---|---|
author | Maister, Nicholas J. Hely, Andrew Twycross, Liam G. Gill, Stephen D. Page, Richard S. |
author_facet | Maister, Nicholas J. Hely, Andrew Twycross, Liam G. Gill, Stephen D. Page, Richard S. |
author_sort | Maister, Nicholas J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The most effective method and modality for measuring glenoid version for different shoulder conditions is uncertain. Computed tomography (CT) imaging exposes the patient to radiation, and standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) does not consistently image the entire scapula. This study investigates the reliability of a new method for assessing glenoid version using routine shoulder MRI. METHODS: MRI images of 20 patients undergoing arthroscopy for shoulder instability were independently assessed by 3 clinicians for osseous and chondrolabral glenoid version. To assess glenoid version, a line was drawn from medial corner of the glenoid body to midpoint of the glenoid face. A line perpendicular to this was the reference against which to measure glenoid version. Measurements were repeated after 3 months to assess intra- and interobserver reliability. Reliability was determined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). RESULTS: Interclass correlation coefficients showed at least good reliability for most estimates of intraobserver reliability (ICC ≥ .66) and excellent reliability for most estimates of interobserver reliability (ICC ≥ .84), with the exception of some inferior glenoid measurements where ICC was poor (ICC ≤.41). DISCUSSION: We propose that this new method of measuring glenoid on standard axial MRI can be used as a simple, practical, and reliable method in shoulder instability patients, which will reduce the requirement for CT in this group. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8282165 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82821652021-09-07 A New Method for Measuring Glenoid Version on Standard Magnetic Resonance Imaging Maister, Nicholas J. Hely, Andrew Twycross, Liam G. Gill, Stephen D. Page, Richard S. J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast Original Scientific Research BACKGROUND: The most effective method and modality for measuring glenoid version for different shoulder conditions is uncertain. Computed tomography (CT) imaging exposes the patient to radiation, and standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) does not consistently image the entire scapula. This study investigates the reliability of a new method for assessing glenoid version using routine shoulder MRI. METHODS: MRI images of 20 patients undergoing arthroscopy for shoulder instability were independently assessed by 3 clinicians for osseous and chondrolabral glenoid version. To assess glenoid version, a line was drawn from medial corner of the glenoid body to midpoint of the glenoid face. A line perpendicular to this was the reference against which to measure glenoid version. Measurements were repeated after 3 months to assess intra- and interobserver reliability. Reliability was determined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). RESULTS: Interclass correlation coefficients showed at least good reliability for most estimates of intraobserver reliability (ICC ≥ .66) and excellent reliability for most estimates of interobserver reliability (ICC ≥ .84), with the exception of some inferior glenoid measurements where ICC was poor (ICC ≤.41). DISCUSSION: We propose that this new method of measuring glenoid on standard axial MRI can be used as a simple, practical, and reliable method in shoulder instability patients, which will reduce the requirement for CT in this group. SAGE Publications 2020-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8282165/ /pubmed/34497961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2471549220926826 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Scientific Research Maister, Nicholas J. Hely, Andrew Twycross, Liam G. Gill, Stephen D. Page, Richard S. A New Method for Measuring Glenoid Version on Standard Magnetic Resonance Imaging |
title | A New Method for Measuring Glenoid Version on Standard Magnetic
Resonance Imaging |
title_full | A New Method for Measuring Glenoid Version on Standard Magnetic
Resonance Imaging |
title_fullStr | A New Method for Measuring Glenoid Version on Standard Magnetic
Resonance Imaging |
title_full_unstemmed | A New Method for Measuring Glenoid Version on Standard Magnetic
Resonance Imaging |
title_short | A New Method for Measuring Glenoid Version on Standard Magnetic
Resonance Imaging |
title_sort | new method for measuring glenoid version on standard magnetic
resonance imaging |
topic | Original Scientific Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8282165/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34497961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2471549220926826 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maisternicholasj anewmethodformeasuringglenoidversiononstandardmagneticresonanceimaging AT helyandrew anewmethodformeasuringglenoidversiononstandardmagneticresonanceimaging AT twycrossliamg anewmethodformeasuringglenoidversiononstandardmagneticresonanceimaging AT gillstephend anewmethodformeasuringglenoidversiononstandardmagneticresonanceimaging AT pagerichards anewmethodformeasuringglenoidversiononstandardmagneticresonanceimaging AT maisternicholasj newmethodformeasuringglenoidversiononstandardmagneticresonanceimaging AT helyandrew newmethodformeasuringglenoidversiononstandardmagneticresonanceimaging AT twycrossliamg newmethodformeasuringglenoidversiononstandardmagneticresonanceimaging AT gillstephend newmethodformeasuringglenoidversiononstandardmagneticresonanceimaging AT pagerichards newmethodformeasuringglenoidversiononstandardmagneticresonanceimaging |