Cargando…

Differential psychological response to the COVID-19 pandemic in psychiatric inpatients compared to a non-clinical population from Germany

The COVID-19 pandemic is an inherently stressful situation, which may lead to adverse psychosocial outcomes in various populations. Yet, individuals may not be affected equally by stressors posed by the pandemic and those with pre-existing mental disorders could be particularly vulnerable. To test t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rek, Stephanie V., Freeman, Daniel, Reinhard, Matthias A., Bühner, Markus, Grosen, Sofie, Falkai, Peter, Adorjan, Kristina, Padberg, Frank
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8282176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34268618
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00406-021-01291-7
_version_ 1783722963424509952
author Rek, Stephanie V.
Freeman, Daniel
Reinhard, Matthias A.
Bühner, Markus
Grosen, Sofie
Falkai, Peter
Adorjan, Kristina
Padberg, Frank
author_facet Rek, Stephanie V.
Freeman, Daniel
Reinhard, Matthias A.
Bühner, Markus
Grosen, Sofie
Falkai, Peter
Adorjan, Kristina
Padberg, Frank
author_sort Rek, Stephanie V.
collection PubMed
description The COVID-19 pandemic is an inherently stressful situation, which may lead to adverse psychosocial outcomes in various populations. Yet, individuals may not be affected equally by stressors posed by the pandemic and those with pre-existing mental disorders could be particularly vulnerable. To test this hypothesis, we assessed the psychological response to the pandemic in a case–control design. We used an age-, sex- and employment status-matched case–control sample (n = 216) of psychiatric inpatients, recruited from the LMU Psychiatry Biobank Munich study and non-clinical individuals from the general population. Participants completed validated self-report measures on stress, anxiety, depression, paranoia, rumination, loneliness, well-being, resilience, and a newly developed index of stressors associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. Multiple linear regression analyses were conducted to assess the effects of group, COVID-19-specific stressors, and their interaction on the different psychosocial outcomes. While psychiatric inpatients reported larger mental health difficulties overall, the impact of COVID-19-specific stressors was lower in patients and not associated with worse psychological functioning compared to non-clinical individuals. In contrast, depressive symptoms, rumination, loneliness, and well-being were more strongly associated with COVID-19-specific stressors in non-clinical individuals and similar to the severity of inpatients for those who experienced the greatest COVID-19-specific stressor impact Contrary to expectations, the psychological response to the pandemic may not be worse in psychiatric inpatients compared to non-clinical individuals. Yet, individuals from the general population, who were hit hardest by the pandemic, should be monitored and may be in need of mental health prevention and treatment efforts. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00406-021-01291-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8282176
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82821762021-07-19 Differential psychological response to the COVID-19 pandemic in psychiatric inpatients compared to a non-clinical population from Germany Rek, Stephanie V. Freeman, Daniel Reinhard, Matthias A. Bühner, Markus Grosen, Sofie Falkai, Peter Adorjan, Kristina Padberg, Frank Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci Original Paper The COVID-19 pandemic is an inherently stressful situation, which may lead to adverse psychosocial outcomes in various populations. Yet, individuals may not be affected equally by stressors posed by the pandemic and those with pre-existing mental disorders could be particularly vulnerable. To test this hypothesis, we assessed the psychological response to the pandemic in a case–control design. We used an age-, sex- and employment status-matched case–control sample (n = 216) of psychiatric inpatients, recruited from the LMU Psychiatry Biobank Munich study and non-clinical individuals from the general population. Participants completed validated self-report measures on stress, anxiety, depression, paranoia, rumination, loneliness, well-being, resilience, and a newly developed index of stressors associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. Multiple linear regression analyses were conducted to assess the effects of group, COVID-19-specific stressors, and their interaction on the different psychosocial outcomes. While psychiatric inpatients reported larger mental health difficulties overall, the impact of COVID-19-specific stressors was lower in patients and not associated with worse psychological functioning compared to non-clinical individuals. In contrast, depressive symptoms, rumination, loneliness, and well-being were more strongly associated with COVID-19-specific stressors in non-clinical individuals and similar to the severity of inpatients for those who experienced the greatest COVID-19-specific stressor impact Contrary to expectations, the psychological response to the pandemic may not be worse in psychiatric inpatients compared to non-clinical individuals. Yet, individuals from the general population, who were hit hardest by the pandemic, should be monitored and may be in need of mental health prevention and treatment efforts. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00406-021-01291-7. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-07-15 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8282176/ /pubmed/34268618 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00406-021-01291-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Rek, Stephanie V.
Freeman, Daniel
Reinhard, Matthias A.
Bühner, Markus
Grosen, Sofie
Falkai, Peter
Adorjan, Kristina
Padberg, Frank
Differential psychological response to the COVID-19 pandemic in psychiatric inpatients compared to a non-clinical population from Germany
title Differential psychological response to the COVID-19 pandemic in psychiatric inpatients compared to a non-clinical population from Germany
title_full Differential psychological response to the COVID-19 pandemic in psychiatric inpatients compared to a non-clinical population from Germany
title_fullStr Differential psychological response to the COVID-19 pandemic in psychiatric inpatients compared to a non-clinical population from Germany
title_full_unstemmed Differential psychological response to the COVID-19 pandemic in psychiatric inpatients compared to a non-clinical population from Germany
title_short Differential psychological response to the COVID-19 pandemic in psychiatric inpatients compared to a non-clinical population from Germany
title_sort differential psychological response to the covid-19 pandemic in psychiatric inpatients compared to a non-clinical population from germany
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8282176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34268618
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00406-021-01291-7
work_keys_str_mv AT rekstephaniev differentialpsychologicalresponsetothecovid19pandemicinpsychiatricinpatientscomparedtoanonclinicalpopulationfromgermany
AT freemandaniel differentialpsychologicalresponsetothecovid19pandemicinpsychiatricinpatientscomparedtoanonclinicalpopulationfromgermany
AT reinhardmatthiasa differentialpsychologicalresponsetothecovid19pandemicinpsychiatricinpatientscomparedtoanonclinicalpopulationfromgermany
AT buhnermarkus differentialpsychologicalresponsetothecovid19pandemicinpsychiatricinpatientscomparedtoanonclinicalpopulationfromgermany
AT grosensofie differentialpsychologicalresponsetothecovid19pandemicinpsychiatricinpatientscomparedtoanonclinicalpopulationfromgermany
AT falkaipeter differentialpsychologicalresponsetothecovid19pandemicinpsychiatricinpatientscomparedtoanonclinicalpopulationfromgermany
AT adorjankristina differentialpsychologicalresponsetothecovid19pandemicinpsychiatricinpatientscomparedtoanonclinicalpopulationfromgermany
AT padbergfrank differentialpsychologicalresponsetothecovid19pandemicinpsychiatricinpatientscomparedtoanonclinicalpopulationfromgermany