Cargando…
Gender disparity between authors in leading medical journals during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional review
OBJECTIVES: Evaluate gender differences in authorship of COVID-19 articles in high-impact medical journals compared with other topics. DESIGN: Cross-sectional review. DATA SOURCES: Medline database. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Articles published from 1 January to 31 December 2020 in the seven leading gene...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8282422/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34261692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051224 |
_version_ | 1783723010062024704 |
---|---|
author | Misra, Vaidehi Safi, Frozan Brewerton, Kathryn A Wu, Wei Mason, Robin Chan, An-Wen Rochon, Paula A Lega, Iliana C Abdel-Qadir, Husam |
author_facet | Misra, Vaidehi Safi, Frozan Brewerton, Kathryn A Wu, Wei Mason, Robin Chan, An-Wen Rochon, Paula A Lega, Iliana C Abdel-Qadir, Husam |
author_sort | Misra, Vaidehi |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Evaluate gender differences in authorship of COVID-19 articles in high-impact medical journals compared with other topics. DESIGN: Cross-sectional review. DATA SOURCES: Medline database. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Articles published from 1 January to 31 December 2020 in the seven leading general medical journals by impact factor. Article types included primary research, reviews, editorials and commentaries. DATA EXTRACTION: Key data elements were whether the study topic was related to COVID-19 and names of the principal and the senior authors. A hierarchical approach was used to determine the likely gender of authors. Logistic regression assessed the association of study characteristics, including COVID-19 status, with authors’ likely gender; this was quantified using adjusted ORs (aORs). RESULTS: We included 2252 articles, of which 748 (33.2%) were COVID-19-related and 1504 (66.8%) covered other topics. A likely gender was determined for 2138 (94.9%) principal authors and 1890 (83.9%) senior authors. Men were significantly more likely to be both principal (1364 men; 63.8%) and senior (1332 men; 70.5%) authors. COVID-19-related articles were not associated with the odds of men being principal (aOR 0.99; 95% CI 0.81 to 1.21; p=0.89) or senior authors (aOR 0.96; 95% CI 0.78 to 1.19; p=0.71) relative to other topics. Articles with men as senior authors were more likely to have men as principal authors (aOR 1.49; 95% CI 1.21 to 1.83; p<0.001). Men were more likely to author articles reporting original research and those with corresponding authors based outside the USA and Europe. CONCLUSIONS: Women were substantially under-represented as authors among articles in leading medical journals; this was not significantly different for COVID-19-related articles. Study limitations include potential for misclassification bias due to the name-based analysis. Results suggest that barriers to women’s authorship in high-impact journals during COVID-19 are not significantly larger than barriers that preceded the pandemic and that are likely to continue beyond it. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020186702. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8282422 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82824222021-07-16 Gender disparity between authors in leading medical journals during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional review Misra, Vaidehi Safi, Frozan Brewerton, Kathryn A Wu, Wei Mason, Robin Chan, An-Wen Rochon, Paula A Lega, Iliana C Abdel-Qadir, Husam BMJ Open Medical Publishing and Peer Review OBJECTIVES: Evaluate gender differences in authorship of COVID-19 articles in high-impact medical journals compared with other topics. DESIGN: Cross-sectional review. DATA SOURCES: Medline database. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Articles published from 1 January to 31 December 2020 in the seven leading general medical journals by impact factor. Article types included primary research, reviews, editorials and commentaries. DATA EXTRACTION: Key data elements were whether the study topic was related to COVID-19 and names of the principal and the senior authors. A hierarchical approach was used to determine the likely gender of authors. Logistic regression assessed the association of study characteristics, including COVID-19 status, with authors’ likely gender; this was quantified using adjusted ORs (aORs). RESULTS: We included 2252 articles, of which 748 (33.2%) were COVID-19-related and 1504 (66.8%) covered other topics. A likely gender was determined for 2138 (94.9%) principal authors and 1890 (83.9%) senior authors. Men were significantly more likely to be both principal (1364 men; 63.8%) and senior (1332 men; 70.5%) authors. COVID-19-related articles were not associated with the odds of men being principal (aOR 0.99; 95% CI 0.81 to 1.21; p=0.89) or senior authors (aOR 0.96; 95% CI 0.78 to 1.19; p=0.71) relative to other topics. Articles with men as senior authors were more likely to have men as principal authors (aOR 1.49; 95% CI 1.21 to 1.83; p<0.001). Men were more likely to author articles reporting original research and those with corresponding authors based outside the USA and Europe. CONCLUSIONS: Women were substantially under-represented as authors among articles in leading medical journals; this was not significantly different for COVID-19-related articles. Study limitations include potential for misclassification bias due to the name-based analysis. Results suggest that barriers to women’s authorship in high-impact journals during COVID-19 are not significantly larger than barriers that preceded the pandemic and that are likely to continue beyond it. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020186702. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8282422/ /pubmed/34261692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051224 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Medical Publishing and Peer Review Misra, Vaidehi Safi, Frozan Brewerton, Kathryn A Wu, Wei Mason, Robin Chan, An-Wen Rochon, Paula A Lega, Iliana C Abdel-Qadir, Husam Gender disparity between authors in leading medical journals during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional review |
title | Gender disparity between authors in leading medical journals during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional review |
title_full | Gender disparity between authors in leading medical journals during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional review |
title_fullStr | Gender disparity between authors in leading medical journals during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional review |
title_full_unstemmed | Gender disparity between authors in leading medical journals during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional review |
title_short | Gender disparity between authors in leading medical journals during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional review |
title_sort | gender disparity between authors in leading medical journals during the covid-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional review |
topic | Medical Publishing and Peer Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8282422/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34261692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051224 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT misravaidehi genderdisparitybetweenauthorsinleadingmedicaljournalsduringthecovid19pandemicacrosssectionalreview AT safifrozan genderdisparitybetweenauthorsinleadingmedicaljournalsduringthecovid19pandemicacrosssectionalreview AT brewertonkathryna genderdisparitybetweenauthorsinleadingmedicaljournalsduringthecovid19pandemicacrosssectionalreview AT wuwei genderdisparitybetweenauthorsinleadingmedicaljournalsduringthecovid19pandemicacrosssectionalreview AT masonrobin genderdisparitybetweenauthorsinleadingmedicaljournalsduringthecovid19pandemicacrosssectionalreview AT chananwen genderdisparitybetweenauthorsinleadingmedicaljournalsduringthecovid19pandemicacrosssectionalreview AT rochonpaulaa genderdisparitybetweenauthorsinleadingmedicaljournalsduringthecovid19pandemicacrosssectionalreview AT legailianac genderdisparitybetweenauthorsinleadingmedicaljournalsduringthecovid19pandemicacrosssectionalreview AT abdelqadirhusam genderdisparitybetweenauthorsinleadingmedicaljournalsduringthecovid19pandemicacrosssectionalreview |