Cargando…

The role of somatosensation in automatic visuo-motor control: a comparison of congenital and acquired sensory loss

Studies of chronically deafferented participants have illuminated how regaining some motor control after adult-onset loss of proprioceptive and touch input depends heavily on cognitive control. In this study we contrasted the performance of one such man, IW, with KS, a woman born without any somatos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miall, R. Chris, Afanasyeva, Daria, Cole, Jonathan D., Mason, Peggy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8282580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33909112
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-021-06110-y
_version_ 1783723040991870976
author Miall, R. Chris
Afanasyeva, Daria
Cole, Jonathan D.
Mason, Peggy
author_facet Miall, R. Chris
Afanasyeva, Daria
Cole, Jonathan D.
Mason, Peggy
author_sort Miall, R. Chris
collection PubMed
description Studies of chronically deafferented participants have illuminated how regaining some motor control after adult-onset loss of proprioceptive and touch input depends heavily on cognitive control. In this study we contrasted the performance of one such man, IW, with KS, a woman born without any somatosensory fibres. We postulated that her life-long absence of proprioception and touch might have allowed her to automate some simple visually-guided actions, something IW appears unable to achieve. We tested these two, and two age-matched control groups, on writing and drawing tasks performed with and without an audio-verbal echoing task that added a cognitive demand. In common with other studies of skilled action, the dual task was shown to affect visuo-motor performance in controls, with less well-controlled drawing and writing, evident as increases in path speed and reduction in curvature and trial duration. We found little evidence that IW was able to automate even the simplest drawing tasks and no evidence for automaticity in his writing. In contrast, KS showed a selective increase in speed of signature writing under the dual-task conditions, suggesting some ability to automate her most familiar writing. We also tested tracing of templates under mirror-reversed conditions, a task that imposes a powerful cognitive planning challenge. Both IW and KS showed evidence of a visuo-motor planning conflict, as did the controls, for shapes with sharp corners. Overall, IW was much faster than his controls to complete tracing shapes, consistent with an absence of visuo-proprioceptive conflict, whereas KS was slower than her controls, especially as the corners became sharper. She dramatically improved after a short period of practice while IW did not. We conclude that KS, who developed from birth without proprioception, may have some visually derived control of movement not under cognitive control, something not seen in IW. This allowed her to automate some writing and drawing actions, but impaired her initial attempts at mirror-tracing. In contrast, IW, who lost somatosensation as an adult, cannot automate these visually guided actions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00221-021-06110-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8282580
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82825802021-07-20 The role of somatosensation in automatic visuo-motor control: a comparison of congenital and acquired sensory loss Miall, R. Chris Afanasyeva, Daria Cole, Jonathan D. Mason, Peggy Exp Brain Res Research Article Studies of chronically deafferented participants have illuminated how regaining some motor control after adult-onset loss of proprioceptive and touch input depends heavily on cognitive control. In this study we contrasted the performance of one such man, IW, with KS, a woman born without any somatosensory fibres. We postulated that her life-long absence of proprioception and touch might have allowed her to automate some simple visually-guided actions, something IW appears unable to achieve. We tested these two, and two age-matched control groups, on writing and drawing tasks performed with and without an audio-verbal echoing task that added a cognitive demand. In common with other studies of skilled action, the dual task was shown to affect visuo-motor performance in controls, with less well-controlled drawing and writing, evident as increases in path speed and reduction in curvature and trial duration. We found little evidence that IW was able to automate even the simplest drawing tasks and no evidence for automaticity in his writing. In contrast, KS showed a selective increase in speed of signature writing under the dual-task conditions, suggesting some ability to automate her most familiar writing. We also tested tracing of templates under mirror-reversed conditions, a task that imposes a powerful cognitive planning challenge. Both IW and KS showed evidence of a visuo-motor planning conflict, as did the controls, for shapes with sharp corners. Overall, IW was much faster than his controls to complete tracing shapes, consistent with an absence of visuo-proprioceptive conflict, whereas KS was slower than her controls, especially as the corners became sharper. She dramatically improved after a short period of practice while IW did not. We conclude that KS, who developed from birth without proprioception, may have some visually derived control of movement not under cognitive control, something not seen in IW. This allowed her to automate some writing and drawing actions, but impaired her initial attempts at mirror-tracing. In contrast, IW, who lost somatosensation as an adult, cannot automate these visually guided actions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00221-021-06110-y. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-04-28 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8282580/ /pubmed/33909112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-021-06110-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Miall, R. Chris
Afanasyeva, Daria
Cole, Jonathan D.
Mason, Peggy
The role of somatosensation in automatic visuo-motor control: a comparison of congenital and acquired sensory loss
title The role of somatosensation in automatic visuo-motor control: a comparison of congenital and acquired sensory loss
title_full The role of somatosensation in automatic visuo-motor control: a comparison of congenital and acquired sensory loss
title_fullStr The role of somatosensation in automatic visuo-motor control: a comparison of congenital and acquired sensory loss
title_full_unstemmed The role of somatosensation in automatic visuo-motor control: a comparison of congenital and acquired sensory loss
title_short The role of somatosensation in automatic visuo-motor control: a comparison of congenital and acquired sensory loss
title_sort role of somatosensation in automatic visuo-motor control: a comparison of congenital and acquired sensory loss
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8282580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33909112
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-021-06110-y
work_keys_str_mv AT miallrchris theroleofsomatosensationinautomaticvisuomotorcontrolacomparisonofcongenitalandacquiredsensoryloss
AT afanasyevadaria theroleofsomatosensationinautomaticvisuomotorcontrolacomparisonofcongenitalandacquiredsensoryloss
AT colejonathand theroleofsomatosensationinautomaticvisuomotorcontrolacomparisonofcongenitalandacquiredsensoryloss
AT masonpeggy theroleofsomatosensationinautomaticvisuomotorcontrolacomparisonofcongenitalandacquiredsensoryloss
AT miallrchris roleofsomatosensationinautomaticvisuomotorcontrolacomparisonofcongenitalandacquiredsensoryloss
AT afanasyevadaria roleofsomatosensationinautomaticvisuomotorcontrolacomparisonofcongenitalandacquiredsensoryloss
AT colejonathand roleofsomatosensationinautomaticvisuomotorcontrolacomparisonofcongenitalandacquiredsensoryloss
AT masonpeggy roleofsomatosensationinautomaticvisuomotorcontrolacomparisonofcongenitalandacquiredsensoryloss