Cargando…

Development and results of a patient-reported treatment experience questionnaire on a 1.5 T MR-Linac

INTRODUCTION: With the implementation of new radiotherapy technology, it is imperative that patient experience is investigated alongside efficacy and outcomes. This paper presents the development of a specifically designed validated questionnaire and a first report of international multi-institution...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barnes, Helen, Alexander, Sophie, Bower, Lorna, Ehlers, Jakob, Gani, Cihan, Herbert, Trina, Lawes, Rebekah, Møller, Pia Krause, Morgan, Toby, Nowee, Marlies E., Smith, Gillian, van Triest, Baukelien, Tyagi, Neelam, Whiteside, Lee, McNair, Helen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8283148/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34307911
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2021.06.003
_version_ 1783723139672309760
author Barnes, Helen
Alexander, Sophie
Bower, Lorna
Ehlers, Jakob
Gani, Cihan
Herbert, Trina
Lawes, Rebekah
Møller, Pia Krause
Morgan, Toby
Nowee, Marlies E.
Smith, Gillian
van Triest, Baukelien
Tyagi, Neelam
Whiteside, Lee
McNair, Helen
author_facet Barnes, Helen
Alexander, Sophie
Bower, Lorna
Ehlers, Jakob
Gani, Cihan
Herbert, Trina
Lawes, Rebekah
Møller, Pia Krause
Morgan, Toby
Nowee, Marlies E.
Smith, Gillian
van Triest, Baukelien
Tyagi, Neelam
Whiteside, Lee
McNair, Helen
author_sort Barnes, Helen
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: With the implementation of new radiotherapy technology, it is imperative that patient experience is investigated alongside efficacy and outcomes. This paper presents the development of a specifically designed validated questionnaire and a first report of international multi-institutional preliminary patient experience of MRI-guided adaptive radiotherapy (MRgART) on the 1.5 T MR-Linac (MRL). METHODS: A patient experience questionnaire was developed and validated before being distributed to the Elekta MRL Consortium, to gather first patient-reported experience from participating centres worldwide. The final version of the questionnaire contains 18 questions covering a range of themes and was scored on a Likert scale of 0–3. Responses were post-processed so that a score of 0 represents a negative response and 3 represents the most favourable response. These results were analysed for patient-reported experience of treatment on the MRL. Results were also analysed for internal consistency of the questionnaire using Chronbach’s Alpha and the questionnaire contents were validated for relevance using content validity indexes (CVI). RESULTS: 170 responses were received from five centres, representing patients with a wide range of tumour treatment sites from four different countries. MRgART was well tolerated with an 84% favourable response across all questions and respondents. When analysed by theme, all reported the highest percentage of results in the favourable categories (2 and 3). Internal consistency in the questionnaire was high (Cronbach’s α = 0.8) and the item-level CVI for each question was 0.78 or above and the Scale-level CVI was 0.93, representing relevant content. CONCLUSION: The developed questionnaire has been validated as relevant and appropriate for use in reporting experience of patients undergoing treatment on the MRL. The overall patient-reported experience and satisfaction from multiple centres within the Elekta MRL Consortium was consistently high. These results can reinforce user confidence in continuing to expand and develop MRL use in adaptive radiotherapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8283148
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82831482021-07-22 Development and results of a patient-reported treatment experience questionnaire on a 1.5 T MR-Linac Barnes, Helen Alexander, Sophie Bower, Lorna Ehlers, Jakob Gani, Cihan Herbert, Trina Lawes, Rebekah Møller, Pia Krause Morgan, Toby Nowee, Marlies E. Smith, Gillian van Triest, Baukelien Tyagi, Neelam Whiteside, Lee McNair, Helen Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Original Research Article INTRODUCTION: With the implementation of new radiotherapy technology, it is imperative that patient experience is investigated alongside efficacy and outcomes. This paper presents the development of a specifically designed validated questionnaire and a first report of international multi-institutional preliminary patient experience of MRI-guided adaptive radiotherapy (MRgART) on the 1.5 T MR-Linac (MRL). METHODS: A patient experience questionnaire was developed and validated before being distributed to the Elekta MRL Consortium, to gather first patient-reported experience from participating centres worldwide. The final version of the questionnaire contains 18 questions covering a range of themes and was scored on a Likert scale of 0–3. Responses were post-processed so that a score of 0 represents a negative response and 3 represents the most favourable response. These results were analysed for patient-reported experience of treatment on the MRL. Results were also analysed for internal consistency of the questionnaire using Chronbach’s Alpha and the questionnaire contents were validated for relevance using content validity indexes (CVI). RESULTS: 170 responses were received from five centres, representing patients with a wide range of tumour treatment sites from four different countries. MRgART was well tolerated with an 84% favourable response across all questions and respondents. When analysed by theme, all reported the highest percentage of results in the favourable categories (2 and 3). Internal consistency in the questionnaire was high (Cronbach’s α = 0.8) and the item-level CVI for each question was 0.78 or above and the Scale-level CVI was 0.93, representing relevant content. CONCLUSION: The developed questionnaire has been validated as relevant and appropriate for use in reporting experience of patients undergoing treatment on the MRL. The overall patient-reported experience and satisfaction from multiple centres within the Elekta MRL Consortium was consistently high. These results can reinforce user confidence in continuing to expand and develop MRL use in adaptive radiotherapy. Elsevier 2021-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8283148/ /pubmed/34307911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2021.06.003 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Barnes, Helen
Alexander, Sophie
Bower, Lorna
Ehlers, Jakob
Gani, Cihan
Herbert, Trina
Lawes, Rebekah
Møller, Pia Krause
Morgan, Toby
Nowee, Marlies E.
Smith, Gillian
van Triest, Baukelien
Tyagi, Neelam
Whiteside, Lee
McNair, Helen
Development and results of a patient-reported treatment experience questionnaire on a 1.5 T MR-Linac
title Development and results of a patient-reported treatment experience questionnaire on a 1.5 T MR-Linac
title_full Development and results of a patient-reported treatment experience questionnaire on a 1.5 T MR-Linac
title_fullStr Development and results of a patient-reported treatment experience questionnaire on a 1.5 T MR-Linac
title_full_unstemmed Development and results of a patient-reported treatment experience questionnaire on a 1.5 T MR-Linac
title_short Development and results of a patient-reported treatment experience questionnaire on a 1.5 T MR-Linac
title_sort development and results of a patient-reported treatment experience questionnaire on a 1.5 t mr-linac
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8283148/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34307911
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2021.06.003
work_keys_str_mv AT barneshelen developmentandresultsofapatientreportedtreatmentexperiencequestionnaireona15tmrlinac
AT alexandersophie developmentandresultsofapatientreportedtreatmentexperiencequestionnaireona15tmrlinac
AT bowerlorna developmentandresultsofapatientreportedtreatmentexperiencequestionnaireona15tmrlinac
AT ehlersjakob developmentandresultsofapatientreportedtreatmentexperiencequestionnaireona15tmrlinac
AT ganicihan developmentandresultsofapatientreportedtreatmentexperiencequestionnaireona15tmrlinac
AT herberttrina developmentandresultsofapatientreportedtreatmentexperiencequestionnaireona15tmrlinac
AT lawesrebekah developmentandresultsofapatientreportedtreatmentexperiencequestionnaireona15tmrlinac
AT møllerpiakrause developmentandresultsofapatientreportedtreatmentexperiencequestionnaireona15tmrlinac
AT morgantoby developmentandresultsofapatientreportedtreatmentexperiencequestionnaireona15tmrlinac
AT noweemarliese developmentandresultsofapatientreportedtreatmentexperiencequestionnaireona15tmrlinac
AT smithgillian developmentandresultsofapatientreportedtreatmentexperiencequestionnaireona15tmrlinac
AT vantriestbaukelien developmentandresultsofapatientreportedtreatmentexperiencequestionnaireona15tmrlinac
AT tyagineelam developmentandresultsofapatientreportedtreatmentexperiencequestionnaireona15tmrlinac
AT whitesidelee developmentandresultsofapatientreportedtreatmentexperiencequestionnaireona15tmrlinac
AT mcnairhelen developmentandresultsofapatientreportedtreatmentexperiencequestionnaireona15tmrlinac