Cargando…
Development and results of a patient-reported treatment experience questionnaire on a 1.5 T MR-Linac
INTRODUCTION: With the implementation of new radiotherapy technology, it is imperative that patient experience is investigated alongside efficacy and outcomes. This paper presents the development of a specifically designed validated questionnaire and a first report of international multi-institution...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8283148/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34307911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2021.06.003 |
_version_ | 1783723139672309760 |
---|---|
author | Barnes, Helen Alexander, Sophie Bower, Lorna Ehlers, Jakob Gani, Cihan Herbert, Trina Lawes, Rebekah Møller, Pia Krause Morgan, Toby Nowee, Marlies E. Smith, Gillian van Triest, Baukelien Tyagi, Neelam Whiteside, Lee McNair, Helen |
author_facet | Barnes, Helen Alexander, Sophie Bower, Lorna Ehlers, Jakob Gani, Cihan Herbert, Trina Lawes, Rebekah Møller, Pia Krause Morgan, Toby Nowee, Marlies E. Smith, Gillian van Triest, Baukelien Tyagi, Neelam Whiteside, Lee McNair, Helen |
author_sort | Barnes, Helen |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: With the implementation of new radiotherapy technology, it is imperative that patient experience is investigated alongside efficacy and outcomes. This paper presents the development of a specifically designed validated questionnaire and a first report of international multi-institutional preliminary patient experience of MRI-guided adaptive radiotherapy (MRgART) on the 1.5 T MR-Linac (MRL). METHODS: A patient experience questionnaire was developed and validated before being distributed to the Elekta MRL Consortium, to gather first patient-reported experience from participating centres worldwide. The final version of the questionnaire contains 18 questions covering a range of themes and was scored on a Likert scale of 0–3. Responses were post-processed so that a score of 0 represents a negative response and 3 represents the most favourable response. These results were analysed for patient-reported experience of treatment on the MRL. Results were also analysed for internal consistency of the questionnaire using Chronbach’s Alpha and the questionnaire contents were validated for relevance using content validity indexes (CVI). RESULTS: 170 responses were received from five centres, representing patients with a wide range of tumour treatment sites from four different countries. MRgART was well tolerated with an 84% favourable response across all questions and respondents. When analysed by theme, all reported the highest percentage of results in the favourable categories (2 and 3). Internal consistency in the questionnaire was high (Cronbach’s α = 0.8) and the item-level CVI for each question was 0.78 or above and the Scale-level CVI was 0.93, representing relevant content. CONCLUSION: The developed questionnaire has been validated as relevant and appropriate for use in reporting experience of patients undergoing treatment on the MRL. The overall patient-reported experience and satisfaction from multiple centres within the Elekta MRL Consortium was consistently high. These results can reinforce user confidence in continuing to expand and develop MRL use in adaptive radiotherapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8283148 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82831482021-07-22 Development and results of a patient-reported treatment experience questionnaire on a 1.5 T MR-Linac Barnes, Helen Alexander, Sophie Bower, Lorna Ehlers, Jakob Gani, Cihan Herbert, Trina Lawes, Rebekah Møller, Pia Krause Morgan, Toby Nowee, Marlies E. Smith, Gillian van Triest, Baukelien Tyagi, Neelam Whiteside, Lee McNair, Helen Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Original Research Article INTRODUCTION: With the implementation of new radiotherapy technology, it is imperative that patient experience is investigated alongside efficacy and outcomes. This paper presents the development of a specifically designed validated questionnaire and a first report of international multi-institutional preliminary patient experience of MRI-guided adaptive radiotherapy (MRgART) on the 1.5 T MR-Linac (MRL). METHODS: A patient experience questionnaire was developed and validated before being distributed to the Elekta MRL Consortium, to gather first patient-reported experience from participating centres worldwide. The final version of the questionnaire contains 18 questions covering a range of themes and was scored on a Likert scale of 0–3. Responses were post-processed so that a score of 0 represents a negative response and 3 represents the most favourable response. These results were analysed for patient-reported experience of treatment on the MRL. Results were also analysed for internal consistency of the questionnaire using Chronbach’s Alpha and the questionnaire contents were validated for relevance using content validity indexes (CVI). RESULTS: 170 responses were received from five centres, representing patients with a wide range of tumour treatment sites from four different countries. MRgART was well tolerated with an 84% favourable response across all questions and respondents. When analysed by theme, all reported the highest percentage of results in the favourable categories (2 and 3). Internal consistency in the questionnaire was high (Cronbach’s α = 0.8) and the item-level CVI for each question was 0.78 or above and the Scale-level CVI was 0.93, representing relevant content. CONCLUSION: The developed questionnaire has been validated as relevant and appropriate for use in reporting experience of patients undergoing treatment on the MRL. The overall patient-reported experience and satisfaction from multiple centres within the Elekta MRL Consortium was consistently high. These results can reinforce user confidence in continuing to expand and develop MRL use in adaptive radiotherapy. Elsevier 2021-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8283148/ /pubmed/34307911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2021.06.003 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Barnes, Helen Alexander, Sophie Bower, Lorna Ehlers, Jakob Gani, Cihan Herbert, Trina Lawes, Rebekah Møller, Pia Krause Morgan, Toby Nowee, Marlies E. Smith, Gillian van Triest, Baukelien Tyagi, Neelam Whiteside, Lee McNair, Helen Development and results of a patient-reported treatment experience questionnaire on a 1.5 T MR-Linac |
title | Development and results of a patient-reported treatment experience questionnaire on a 1.5 T MR-Linac |
title_full | Development and results of a patient-reported treatment experience questionnaire on a 1.5 T MR-Linac |
title_fullStr | Development and results of a patient-reported treatment experience questionnaire on a 1.5 T MR-Linac |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and results of a patient-reported treatment experience questionnaire on a 1.5 T MR-Linac |
title_short | Development and results of a patient-reported treatment experience questionnaire on a 1.5 T MR-Linac |
title_sort | development and results of a patient-reported treatment experience questionnaire on a 1.5 t mr-linac |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8283148/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34307911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2021.06.003 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT barneshelen developmentandresultsofapatientreportedtreatmentexperiencequestionnaireona15tmrlinac AT alexandersophie developmentandresultsofapatientreportedtreatmentexperiencequestionnaireona15tmrlinac AT bowerlorna developmentandresultsofapatientreportedtreatmentexperiencequestionnaireona15tmrlinac AT ehlersjakob developmentandresultsofapatientreportedtreatmentexperiencequestionnaireona15tmrlinac AT ganicihan developmentandresultsofapatientreportedtreatmentexperiencequestionnaireona15tmrlinac AT herberttrina developmentandresultsofapatientreportedtreatmentexperiencequestionnaireona15tmrlinac AT lawesrebekah developmentandresultsofapatientreportedtreatmentexperiencequestionnaireona15tmrlinac AT møllerpiakrause developmentandresultsofapatientreportedtreatmentexperiencequestionnaireona15tmrlinac AT morgantoby developmentandresultsofapatientreportedtreatmentexperiencequestionnaireona15tmrlinac AT noweemarliese developmentandresultsofapatientreportedtreatmentexperiencequestionnaireona15tmrlinac AT smithgillian developmentandresultsofapatientreportedtreatmentexperiencequestionnaireona15tmrlinac AT vantriestbaukelien developmentandresultsofapatientreportedtreatmentexperiencequestionnaireona15tmrlinac AT tyagineelam developmentandresultsofapatientreportedtreatmentexperiencequestionnaireona15tmrlinac AT whitesidelee developmentandresultsofapatientreportedtreatmentexperiencequestionnaireona15tmrlinac AT mcnairhelen developmentandresultsofapatientreportedtreatmentexperiencequestionnaireona15tmrlinac |