Cargando…
Artificial intelligence extension of the OSCAR‐IB criteria
Artificial intelligence (AI)‐based diagnostic algorithms have achieved ambitious aims through automated image pattern recognition. For neurological disorders, this includes neurodegeneration and inflammation. Scalable imaging technology for big data in neurology is optical coherence tomography (OCT)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8283174/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34008926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acn3.51320 |
_version_ | 1783723145780264960 |
---|---|
author | Petzold, Axel Albrecht, Philipp Balcer, Laura Bekkers, Erik Brandt, Alexander U. Calabresi, Peter A. Deborah, Orla Galvin Graves, Jennifer S. Green, Ari Keane, Pearse A Nij Bijvank, Jenny A. Sander, Josemir W. Paul, Friedemann Saidha, Shiv Villoslada, Pablo Wagner, Siegfried K Yeh, E. Ann |
author_facet | Petzold, Axel Albrecht, Philipp Balcer, Laura Bekkers, Erik Brandt, Alexander U. Calabresi, Peter A. Deborah, Orla Galvin Graves, Jennifer S. Green, Ari Keane, Pearse A Nij Bijvank, Jenny A. Sander, Josemir W. Paul, Friedemann Saidha, Shiv Villoslada, Pablo Wagner, Siegfried K Yeh, E. Ann |
author_sort | Petzold, Axel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Artificial intelligence (AI)‐based diagnostic algorithms have achieved ambitious aims through automated image pattern recognition. For neurological disorders, this includes neurodegeneration and inflammation. Scalable imaging technology for big data in neurology is optical coherence tomography (OCT). We highlight that OCT changes observed in the retina, as a window to the brain, are small, requiring rigorous quality control pipelines. There are existing tools for this purpose. Firstly, there are human‐led validated consensus quality control criteria (OSCAR‐IB) for OCT. Secondly, these criteria are embedded into OCT reporting guidelines (APOSTEL). The use of the described annotation of failed OCT scans advances machine learning. This is illustrated through the present review of the advantages and disadvantages of AI‐based applications to OCT data. The neurological conditions reviewed here for the use of big data include Alzheimer disease, stroke, multiple sclerosis (MS), Parkinson disease, and epilepsy. It is noted that while big data is relevant for AI, ownership is complex. For this reason, we also reached out to involve representatives from patient organizations and the public domain in addition to clinical and research centers. The evidence reviewed can be grouped in a five‐point expansion of the OSCAR‐IB criteria to embrace AI (OSCAR‐AI). The review concludes by specific recommendations on how this can be achieved practically and in compliance with existing guidelines. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8283174 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82831742021-07-21 Artificial intelligence extension of the OSCAR‐IB criteria Petzold, Axel Albrecht, Philipp Balcer, Laura Bekkers, Erik Brandt, Alexander U. Calabresi, Peter A. Deborah, Orla Galvin Graves, Jennifer S. Green, Ari Keane, Pearse A Nij Bijvank, Jenny A. Sander, Josemir W. Paul, Friedemann Saidha, Shiv Villoslada, Pablo Wagner, Siegfried K Yeh, E. Ann Ann Clin Transl Neurol Reviews Artificial intelligence (AI)‐based diagnostic algorithms have achieved ambitious aims through automated image pattern recognition. For neurological disorders, this includes neurodegeneration and inflammation. Scalable imaging technology for big data in neurology is optical coherence tomography (OCT). We highlight that OCT changes observed in the retina, as a window to the brain, are small, requiring rigorous quality control pipelines. There are existing tools for this purpose. Firstly, there are human‐led validated consensus quality control criteria (OSCAR‐IB) for OCT. Secondly, these criteria are embedded into OCT reporting guidelines (APOSTEL). The use of the described annotation of failed OCT scans advances machine learning. This is illustrated through the present review of the advantages and disadvantages of AI‐based applications to OCT data. The neurological conditions reviewed here for the use of big data include Alzheimer disease, stroke, multiple sclerosis (MS), Parkinson disease, and epilepsy. It is noted that while big data is relevant for AI, ownership is complex. For this reason, we also reached out to involve representatives from patient organizations and the public domain in addition to clinical and research centers. The evidence reviewed can be grouped in a five‐point expansion of the OSCAR‐IB criteria to embrace AI (OSCAR‐AI). The review concludes by specific recommendations on how this can be achieved practically and in compliance with existing guidelines. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8283174/ /pubmed/34008926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acn3.51320 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Neurological Association https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Reviews Petzold, Axel Albrecht, Philipp Balcer, Laura Bekkers, Erik Brandt, Alexander U. Calabresi, Peter A. Deborah, Orla Galvin Graves, Jennifer S. Green, Ari Keane, Pearse A Nij Bijvank, Jenny A. Sander, Josemir W. Paul, Friedemann Saidha, Shiv Villoslada, Pablo Wagner, Siegfried K Yeh, E. Ann Artificial intelligence extension of the OSCAR‐IB criteria |
title | Artificial intelligence extension of the OSCAR‐IB criteria |
title_full | Artificial intelligence extension of the OSCAR‐IB criteria |
title_fullStr | Artificial intelligence extension of the OSCAR‐IB criteria |
title_full_unstemmed | Artificial intelligence extension of the OSCAR‐IB criteria |
title_short | Artificial intelligence extension of the OSCAR‐IB criteria |
title_sort | artificial intelligence extension of the oscar‐ib criteria |
topic | Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8283174/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34008926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acn3.51320 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT petzoldaxel artificialintelligenceextensionoftheoscaribcriteria AT albrechtphilipp artificialintelligenceextensionoftheoscaribcriteria AT balcerlaura artificialintelligenceextensionoftheoscaribcriteria AT bekkerserik artificialintelligenceextensionoftheoscaribcriteria AT brandtalexanderu artificialintelligenceextensionoftheoscaribcriteria AT calabresipetera artificialintelligenceextensionoftheoscaribcriteria AT deborahorlagalvin artificialintelligenceextensionoftheoscaribcriteria AT gravesjennifers artificialintelligenceextensionoftheoscaribcriteria AT greenari artificialintelligenceextensionoftheoscaribcriteria AT keanepearsea artificialintelligenceextensionoftheoscaribcriteria AT nijbijvankjennya artificialintelligenceextensionoftheoscaribcriteria AT sanderjosemirw artificialintelligenceextensionoftheoscaribcriteria AT paulfriedemann artificialintelligenceextensionoftheoscaribcriteria AT saidhashiv artificialintelligenceextensionoftheoscaribcriteria AT villosladapablo artificialintelligenceextensionoftheoscaribcriteria AT wagnersiegfriedk artificialintelligenceextensionoftheoscaribcriteria AT yeheann artificialintelligenceextensionoftheoscaribcriteria AT artificialintelligenceextensionoftheoscaribcriteria |