Cargando…

Artificial intelligence extension of the OSCAR‐IB criteria

Artificial intelligence (AI)‐based diagnostic algorithms have achieved ambitious aims through automated image pattern recognition. For neurological disorders, this includes neurodegeneration and inflammation. Scalable imaging technology for big data in neurology is optical coherence tomography (OCT)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Petzold, Axel, Albrecht, Philipp, Balcer, Laura, Bekkers, Erik, Brandt, Alexander U., Calabresi, Peter A., Deborah, Orla Galvin, Graves, Jennifer S., Green, Ari, Keane, Pearse A, Nij Bijvank, Jenny A., Sander, Josemir W., Paul, Friedemann, Saidha, Shiv, Villoslada, Pablo, Wagner, Siegfried K, Yeh, E. Ann
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8283174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34008926
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acn3.51320
_version_ 1783723145780264960
author Petzold, Axel
Albrecht, Philipp
Balcer, Laura
Bekkers, Erik
Brandt, Alexander U.
Calabresi, Peter A.
Deborah, Orla Galvin
Graves, Jennifer S.
Green, Ari
Keane, Pearse A
Nij Bijvank, Jenny A.
Sander, Josemir W.
Paul, Friedemann
Saidha, Shiv
Villoslada, Pablo
Wagner, Siegfried K
Yeh, E. Ann
author_facet Petzold, Axel
Albrecht, Philipp
Balcer, Laura
Bekkers, Erik
Brandt, Alexander U.
Calabresi, Peter A.
Deborah, Orla Galvin
Graves, Jennifer S.
Green, Ari
Keane, Pearse A
Nij Bijvank, Jenny A.
Sander, Josemir W.
Paul, Friedemann
Saidha, Shiv
Villoslada, Pablo
Wagner, Siegfried K
Yeh, E. Ann
author_sort Petzold, Axel
collection PubMed
description Artificial intelligence (AI)‐based diagnostic algorithms have achieved ambitious aims through automated image pattern recognition. For neurological disorders, this includes neurodegeneration and inflammation. Scalable imaging technology for big data in neurology is optical coherence tomography (OCT). We highlight that OCT changes observed in the retina, as a window to the brain, are small, requiring rigorous quality control pipelines. There are existing tools for this purpose. Firstly, there are human‐led validated consensus quality control criteria (OSCAR‐IB) for OCT. Secondly, these criteria are embedded into OCT reporting guidelines (APOSTEL). The use of the described annotation of failed OCT scans advances machine learning. This is illustrated through the present review of the advantages and disadvantages of AI‐based applications to OCT data. The neurological conditions reviewed here for the use of big data include Alzheimer disease, stroke, multiple sclerosis (MS), Parkinson disease, and epilepsy. It is noted that while big data is relevant for AI, ownership is complex. For this reason, we also reached out to involve representatives from patient organizations and the public domain in addition to clinical and research centers. The evidence reviewed can be grouped in a five‐point expansion of the OSCAR‐IB criteria to embrace AI (OSCAR‐AI). The review concludes by specific recommendations on how this can be achieved practically and in compliance with existing guidelines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8283174
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82831742021-07-21 Artificial intelligence extension of the OSCAR‐IB criteria Petzold, Axel Albrecht, Philipp Balcer, Laura Bekkers, Erik Brandt, Alexander U. Calabresi, Peter A. Deborah, Orla Galvin Graves, Jennifer S. Green, Ari Keane, Pearse A Nij Bijvank, Jenny A. Sander, Josemir W. Paul, Friedemann Saidha, Shiv Villoslada, Pablo Wagner, Siegfried K Yeh, E. Ann Ann Clin Transl Neurol Reviews Artificial intelligence (AI)‐based diagnostic algorithms have achieved ambitious aims through automated image pattern recognition. For neurological disorders, this includes neurodegeneration and inflammation. Scalable imaging technology for big data in neurology is optical coherence tomography (OCT). We highlight that OCT changes observed in the retina, as a window to the brain, are small, requiring rigorous quality control pipelines. There are existing tools for this purpose. Firstly, there are human‐led validated consensus quality control criteria (OSCAR‐IB) for OCT. Secondly, these criteria are embedded into OCT reporting guidelines (APOSTEL). The use of the described annotation of failed OCT scans advances machine learning. This is illustrated through the present review of the advantages and disadvantages of AI‐based applications to OCT data. The neurological conditions reviewed here for the use of big data include Alzheimer disease, stroke, multiple sclerosis (MS), Parkinson disease, and epilepsy. It is noted that while big data is relevant for AI, ownership is complex. For this reason, we also reached out to involve representatives from patient organizations and the public domain in addition to clinical and research centers. The evidence reviewed can be grouped in a five‐point expansion of the OSCAR‐IB criteria to embrace AI (OSCAR‐AI). The review concludes by specific recommendations on how this can be achieved practically and in compliance with existing guidelines. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8283174/ /pubmed/34008926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acn3.51320 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Neurological Association https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Reviews
Petzold, Axel
Albrecht, Philipp
Balcer, Laura
Bekkers, Erik
Brandt, Alexander U.
Calabresi, Peter A.
Deborah, Orla Galvin
Graves, Jennifer S.
Green, Ari
Keane, Pearse A
Nij Bijvank, Jenny A.
Sander, Josemir W.
Paul, Friedemann
Saidha, Shiv
Villoslada, Pablo
Wagner, Siegfried K
Yeh, E. Ann
Artificial intelligence extension of the OSCAR‐IB criteria
title Artificial intelligence extension of the OSCAR‐IB criteria
title_full Artificial intelligence extension of the OSCAR‐IB criteria
title_fullStr Artificial intelligence extension of the OSCAR‐IB criteria
title_full_unstemmed Artificial intelligence extension of the OSCAR‐IB criteria
title_short Artificial intelligence extension of the OSCAR‐IB criteria
title_sort artificial intelligence extension of the oscar‐ib criteria
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8283174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34008926
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acn3.51320
work_keys_str_mv AT petzoldaxel artificialintelligenceextensionoftheoscaribcriteria
AT albrechtphilipp artificialintelligenceextensionoftheoscaribcriteria
AT balcerlaura artificialintelligenceextensionoftheoscaribcriteria
AT bekkerserik artificialintelligenceextensionoftheoscaribcriteria
AT brandtalexanderu artificialintelligenceextensionoftheoscaribcriteria
AT calabresipetera artificialintelligenceextensionoftheoscaribcriteria
AT deborahorlagalvin artificialintelligenceextensionoftheoscaribcriteria
AT gravesjennifers artificialintelligenceextensionoftheoscaribcriteria
AT greenari artificialintelligenceextensionoftheoscaribcriteria
AT keanepearsea artificialintelligenceextensionoftheoscaribcriteria
AT nijbijvankjennya artificialintelligenceextensionoftheoscaribcriteria
AT sanderjosemirw artificialintelligenceextensionoftheoscaribcriteria
AT paulfriedemann artificialintelligenceextensionoftheoscaribcriteria
AT saidhashiv artificialintelligenceextensionoftheoscaribcriteria
AT villosladapablo artificialintelligenceextensionoftheoscaribcriteria
AT wagnersiegfriedk artificialintelligenceextensionoftheoscaribcriteria
AT yeheann artificialintelligenceextensionoftheoscaribcriteria
AT artificialintelligenceextensionoftheoscaribcriteria