Cargando…

PREOPERATIVE 3D MODELING AND PRINTING FOR GUIDING PERIACETABULAR OSTEOTOMY

BACKGROUND: Achieving adequate acetabular correction in multiple planes is essential to the success of Periacetabular Osteotomy (PAO). Three-dimensional (3D) modeling and printing has the potential to improve preoperative planning by accurately guiding intraoperative correction. HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shelton, Trevor J., Shafagh, Monazzam, Calafi, Arash, Leshikar, Holly B., Haus, Brian M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8283345/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967121S00026
_version_ 1783723180894978048
author Shelton, Trevor J.
Shafagh, Monazzam
Calafi, Arash
Leshikar, Holly B.
Haus, Brian M.
author_facet Shelton, Trevor J.
Shafagh, Monazzam
Calafi, Arash
Leshikar, Holly B.
Haus, Brian M.
author_sort Shelton, Trevor J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Achieving adequate acetabular correction in multiple planes is essential to the success of Periacetabular Osteotomy (PAO). Three-dimensional (3D) modeling and printing has the potential to improve preoperative planning by accurately guiding intraoperative correction. HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE: We, therefore, asked the following questions: 1) For a patient undergoing a PAO, does 3D-modeling with intraoperative 3D-printed models create a reproducible surgical plan to obtain predetermined parameters of correction including lateral center-edge angle (LCEA), anterior center-edge angle (ACEA), Tonnis angle, and femoral head extrusion index (FHEI), 2) Can 3D computer modeling accurately predict when a normalized FHEI can be achieved without the need for a concomitant femoral sided osteotomy? METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on forty-two (42) consecutive patients that underwent a PAO. 3D-modeling software was utilized to simulate a PAO in order to achieve normal LCEA, ACEA, Tonnis angle, and FHEI. If adequate FHEI was not achieved, a femoral osteotomy was simulated. 3D-models were printed as intraoperative guides. Preoperative, simulated, and postoperative ACEA, LCEA, Tonnis angle, and FHEI were measured and compared statistically. RESULTS: 40 patients had a traditional PAO, and 2 had an anteverting-PAO. The simulated LCEA, ACEA, Tonnis angle, and FHEI were within a median difference of 3º, 1º, 1°, and 0% of postoperative values, respectively and showed no statistical difference. Of those that had a traditional PAO, all thirty-four (34) patients were correctly predicted to need a traditional acetabular sided correction alone and the other six (6) were correctly predicted to need a concomitant femoral osteotomy for a correct prediction in 100% of patients. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that in PAO, 3D-modeling and printing allow the surgeon to accurately create a reproducible surgical plan to obtain predetermined postoperative hip coverage parameters. This new technology has the potential to improve preoperative/intra-operative decision making for hip dysplasia and other complex disorders of the hip.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8283345
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82833452021-07-30 PREOPERATIVE 3D MODELING AND PRINTING FOR GUIDING PERIACETABULAR OSTEOTOMY Shelton, Trevor J. Shafagh, Monazzam Calafi, Arash Leshikar, Holly B. Haus, Brian M. Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: Achieving adequate acetabular correction in multiple planes is essential to the success of Periacetabular Osteotomy (PAO). Three-dimensional (3D) modeling and printing has the potential to improve preoperative planning by accurately guiding intraoperative correction. HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE: We, therefore, asked the following questions: 1) For a patient undergoing a PAO, does 3D-modeling with intraoperative 3D-printed models create a reproducible surgical plan to obtain predetermined parameters of correction including lateral center-edge angle (LCEA), anterior center-edge angle (ACEA), Tonnis angle, and femoral head extrusion index (FHEI), 2) Can 3D computer modeling accurately predict when a normalized FHEI can be achieved without the need for a concomitant femoral sided osteotomy? METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on forty-two (42) consecutive patients that underwent a PAO. 3D-modeling software was utilized to simulate a PAO in order to achieve normal LCEA, ACEA, Tonnis angle, and FHEI. If adequate FHEI was not achieved, a femoral osteotomy was simulated. 3D-models were printed as intraoperative guides. Preoperative, simulated, and postoperative ACEA, LCEA, Tonnis angle, and FHEI were measured and compared statistically. RESULTS: 40 patients had a traditional PAO, and 2 had an anteverting-PAO. The simulated LCEA, ACEA, Tonnis angle, and FHEI were within a median difference of 3º, 1º, 1°, and 0% of postoperative values, respectively and showed no statistical difference. Of those that had a traditional PAO, all thirty-four (34) patients were correctly predicted to need a traditional acetabular sided correction alone and the other six (6) were correctly predicted to need a concomitant femoral osteotomy for a correct prediction in 100% of patients. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that in PAO, 3D-modeling and printing allow the surgeon to accurately create a reproducible surgical plan to obtain predetermined postoperative hip coverage parameters. This new technology has the potential to improve preoperative/intra-operative decision making for hip dysplasia and other complex disorders of the hip. SAGE Publications 2021-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8283345/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967121S00026 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For article reuse guidelines, please visit SAGE’s website at http://www.sagepub.com/journals-permissions.
spellingShingle Article
Shelton, Trevor J.
Shafagh, Monazzam
Calafi, Arash
Leshikar, Holly B.
Haus, Brian M.
PREOPERATIVE 3D MODELING AND PRINTING FOR GUIDING PERIACETABULAR OSTEOTOMY
title PREOPERATIVE 3D MODELING AND PRINTING FOR GUIDING PERIACETABULAR OSTEOTOMY
title_full PREOPERATIVE 3D MODELING AND PRINTING FOR GUIDING PERIACETABULAR OSTEOTOMY
title_fullStr PREOPERATIVE 3D MODELING AND PRINTING FOR GUIDING PERIACETABULAR OSTEOTOMY
title_full_unstemmed PREOPERATIVE 3D MODELING AND PRINTING FOR GUIDING PERIACETABULAR OSTEOTOMY
title_short PREOPERATIVE 3D MODELING AND PRINTING FOR GUIDING PERIACETABULAR OSTEOTOMY
title_sort preoperative 3d modeling and printing for guiding periacetabular osteotomy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8283345/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967121S00026
work_keys_str_mv AT sheltontrevorj preoperative3dmodelingandprintingforguidingperiacetabularosteotomy
AT shafaghmonazzam preoperative3dmodelingandprintingforguidingperiacetabularosteotomy
AT calafiarash preoperative3dmodelingandprintingforguidingperiacetabularosteotomy
AT leshikarhollyb preoperative3dmodelingandprintingforguidingperiacetabularosteotomy
AT hausbrianm preoperative3dmodelingandprintingforguidingperiacetabularosteotomy