Cargando…
A comparison of mycophenolate mofetil and calcineurin inhibitor as maintenance immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
BACKGROUND/AIM: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the comparison and its timing between mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) as maintenance immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients. MATERIALS AND MET...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8283438/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33356028 http://dx.doi.org/10.3906/sag-1910-156 |
_version_ | 1783723202560655360 |
---|---|
author | DENG, Jin LU, Yi HE, Lihong OU, Jihong XIE, Hongping |
author_facet | DENG, Jin LU, Yi HE, Lihong OU, Jihong XIE, Hongping |
author_sort | DENG, Jin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/AIM: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the comparison and its timing between mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) as maintenance immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The RCTs of MMF versus CNI as maintenance immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients were searched from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CCRCT), and ClinicalTrials.gov. After screening relevant RCTs, two authors independently assessed the quality of included studies and performed a meta-analysis using RevMan5.3. Relative risk (RR) was used to report dichotomous data, while mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to report continuous outcomes. The analysis was conducted using the random-effect model due to the expected heterogeneity among different studies. Four subgroups were allocated to compare MMF with CNI as maintenance immunosuppression: (1) after 3 months of CNI-based therapy, (2) after 6 months of CNI-based therapy, (3) after 12 months of CNI-based therapy, and (4) in recipients with allograft dysfunction. RESULTS: Twelve RCTs with 950 renal transplant recipients were included. This meta-analysis presented the following results upon comparison between MMF and CNI as maintenance immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients: (1) MMF significantly improved the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) not only in the comparison performed after 3, 6, or 12 months of CNI-based therapy but also in the comparison of recipients with allograft dysfunction, (2) MMF may increase the risk of acute rejection in the comparison performed after 3 months of CNI-based therapy, but no increase was noted in the comparison performed after 6 or 12 months of CNI-based therapy. CONCLUSION: Our present meta-analysis suggested that MMF followed at least 6 months of CNI-based therapy is an effective maintenance immunosuppressive regimen for kidney transplant recipients to improve renal function but not increase rejection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8283438 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82834382021-08-02 A comparison of mycophenolate mofetil and calcineurin inhibitor as maintenance immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials DENG, Jin LU, Yi HE, Lihong OU, Jihong XIE, Hongping Turk J Med Sci Article BACKGROUND/AIM: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the comparison and its timing between mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) as maintenance immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The RCTs of MMF versus CNI as maintenance immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients were searched from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CCRCT), and ClinicalTrials.gov. After screening relevant RCTs, two authors independently assessed the quality of included studies and performed a meta-analysis using RevMan5.3. Relative risk (RR) was used to report dichotomous data, while mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to report continuous outcomes. The analysis was conducted using the random-effect model due to the expected heterogeneity among different studies. Four subgroups were allocated to compare MMF with CNI as maintenance immunosuppression: (1) after 3 months of CNI-based therapy, (2) after 6 months of CNI-based therapy, (3) after 12 months of CNI-based therapy, and (4) in recipients with allograft dysfunction. RESULTS: Twelve RCTs with 950 renal transplant recipients were included. This meta-analysis presented the following results upon comparison between MMF and CNI as maintenance immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients: (1) MMF significantly improved the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) not only in the comparison performed after 3, 6, or 12 months of CNI-based therapy but also in the comparison of recipients with allograft dysfunction, (2) MMF may increase the risk of acute rejection in the comparison performed after 3 months of CNI-based therapy, but no increase was noted in the comparison performed after 6 or 12 months of CNI-based therapy. CONCLUSION: Our present meta-analysis suggested that MMF followed at least 6 months of CNI-based therapy is an effective maintenance immunosuppressive regimen for kidney transplant recipients to improve renal function but not increase rejection. The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey 2021-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8283438/ /pubmed/33356028 http://dx.doi.org/10.3906/sag-1910-156 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Article DENG, Jin LU, Yi HE, Lihong OU, Jihong XIE, Hongping A comparison of mycophenolate mofetil and calcineurin inhibitor as maintenance immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title | A comparison of mycophenolate mofetil and calcineurin inhibitor as maintenance immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_full | A comparison of mycophenolate mofetil and calcineurin inhibitor as maintenance immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_fullStr | A comparison of mycophenolate mofetil and calcineurin inhibitor as maintenance immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of mycophenolate mofetil and calcineurin inhibitor as maintenance immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_short | A comparison of mycophenolate mofetil and calcineurin inhibitor as maintenance immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_sort | comparison of mycophenolate mofetil and calcineurin inhibitor as maintenance immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8283438/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33356028 http://dx.doi.org/10.3906/sag-1910-156 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dengjin acomparisonofmycophenolatemofetilandcalcineurininhibitorasmaintenanceimmunosuppressionforkidneytransplantrecipientsametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT luyi acomparisonofmycophenolatemofetilandcalcineurininhibitorasmaintenanceimmunosuppressionforkidneytransplantrecipientsametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT helihong acomparisonofmycophenolatemofetilandcalcineurininhibitorasmaintenanceimmunosuppressionforkidneytransplantrecipientsametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT oujihong acomparisonofmycophenolatemofetilandcalcineurininhibitorasmaintenanceimmunosuppressionforkidneytransplantrecipientsametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT xiehongping acomparisonofmycophenolatemofetilandcalcineurininhibitorasmaintenanceimmunosuppressionforkidneytransplantrecipientsametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT dengjin comparisonofmycophenolatemofetilandcalcineurininhibitorasmaintenanceimmunosuppressionforkidneytransplantrecipientsametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT luyi comparisonofmycophenolatemofetilandcalcineurininhibitorasmaintenanceimmunosuppressionforkidneytransplantrecipientsametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT helihong comparisonofmycophenolatemofetilandcalcineurininhibitorasmaintenanceimmunosuppressionforkidneytransplantrecipientsametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT oujihong comparisonofmycophenolatemofetilandcalcineurininhibitorasmaintenanceimmunosuppressionforkidneytransplantrecipientsametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT xiehongping comparisonofmycophenolatemofetilandcalcineurininhibitorasmaintenanceimmunosuppressionforkidneytransplantrecipientsametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials |