Cargando…
Diagnosing small fiber neuropathy in clinical practice: a deep phenotyping study
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Small fiber neuropathy (SFN) is increasingly suspected in patients with pain of uncertain origin, and making the diagnosis remains a challenge lacking a diagnostic gold standard. METHODS: In this case–control study, we prospectively recruited 86 patients with a medical history a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8283814/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34335876 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562864211004318 |
_version_ | 1783723276672958464 |
---|---|
author | Egenolf, Nadine zu Altenschildesche, Caren Meyer Kreß, Luisa Eggermann, Katja Namer, Barbara Gross, Franziska Klitsch, Alexander Malzacher, Tobias Kampik, Daniel Malik, Rayaz A. Kurth, Ingo Sommer, Claudia Üçeyler, Nurcan |
author_facet | Egenolf, Nadine zu Altenschildesche, Caren Meyer Kreß, Luisa Eggermann, Katja Namer, Barbara Gross, Franziska Klitsch, Alexander Malzacher, Tobias Kampik, Daniel Malik, Rayaz A. Kurth, Ingo Sommer, Claudia Üçeyler, Nurcan |
author_sort | Egenolf, Nadine |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Small fiber neuropathy (SFN) is increasingly suspected in patients with pain of uncertain origin, and making the diagnosis remains a challenge lacking a diagnostic gold standard. METHODS: In this case–control study, we prospectively recruited 86 patients with a medical history and clinical phenotype suggestive of SFN. Patients underwent neurological examination, quantitative sensory testing (QST), and distal and proximal skin punch biopsy, and were tested for pain-associated gene loci. Fifty-five of these patients additionally underwent pain-related evoked potentials (PREP), corneal confocal microscopy (CCM), and a quantitative sudomotor axon reflex test (QSART). RESULTS: Abnormal distal intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) (60/86, 70%) and neurological examination (53/86, 62%) most frequently reflected small fiber disease. Adding CCM and/or PREP further increased the number of patients with small fiber impairment to 47/55 (85%). Genetic testing revealed potentially pathogenic gene variants in 14/86 (16%) index patients. QST, QSART, and proximal IENFD were of lower impact. CONCLUSION: We propose to diagnose SFN primarily based on the results of neurological examination and distal IENFD, with more detailed phenotyping in specialized centers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8283814 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82838142021-07-30 Diagnosing small fiber neuropathy in clinical practice: a deep phenotyping study Egenolf, Nadine zu Altenschildesche, Caren Meyer Kreß, Luisa Eggermann, Katja Namer, Barbara Gross, Franziska Klitsch, Alexander Malzacher, Tobias Kampik, Daniel Malik, Rayaz A. Kurth, Ingo Sommer, Claudia Üçeyler, Nurcan Ther Adv Neurol Disord Original Research BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Small fiber neuropathy (SFN) is increasingly suspected in patients with pain of uncertain origin, and making the diagnosis remains a challenge lacking a diagnostic gold standard. METHODS: In this case–control study, we prospectively recruited 86 patients with a medical history and clinical phenotype suggestive of SFN. Patients underwent neurological examination, quantitative sensory testing (QST), and distal and proximal skin punch biopsy, and were tested for pain-associated gene loci. Fifty-five of these patients additionally underwent pain-related evoked potentials (PREP), corneal confocal microscopy (CCM), and a quantitative sudomotor axon reflex test (QSART). RESULTS: Abnormal distal intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) (60/86, 70%) and neurological examination (53/86, 62%) most frequently reflected small fiber disease. Adding CCM and/or PREP further increased the number of patients with small fiber impairment to 47/55 (85%). Genetic testing revealed potentially pathogenic gene variants in 14/86 (16%) index patients. QST, QSART, and proximal IENFD were of lower impact. CONCLUSION: We propose to diagnose SFN primarily based on the results of neurological examination and distal IENFD, with more detailed phenotyping in specialized centers. SAGE Publications 2021-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8283814/ /pubmed/34335876 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562864211004318 Text en © The Author(s), 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Egenolf, Nadine zu Altenschildesche, Caren Meyer Kreß, Luisa Eggermann, Katja Namer, Barbara Gross, Franziska Klitsch, Alexander Malzacher, Tobias Kampik, Daniel Malik, Rayaz A. Kurth, Ingo Sommer, Claudia Üçeyler, Nurcan Diagnosing small fiber neuropathy in clinical practice: a deep phenotyping study |
title | Diagnosing small fiber neuropathy in clinical practice: a deep phenotyping study |
title_full | Diagnosing small fiber neuropathy in clinical practice: a deep phenotyping study |
title_fullStr | Diagnosing small fiber neuropathy in clinical practice: a deep phenotyping study |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnosing small fiber neuropathy in clinical practice: a deep phenotyping study |
title_short | Diagnosing small fiber neuropathy in clinical practice: a deep phenotyping study |
title_sort | diagnosing small fiber neuropathy in clinical practice: a deep phenotyping study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8283814/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34335876 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562864211004318 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT egenolfnadine diagnosingsmallfiberneuropathyinclinicalpracticeadeepphenotypingstudy AT zualtenschildeschecarenmeyer diagnosingsmallfiberneuropathyinclinicalpracticeadeepphenotypingstudy AT kreßluisa diagnosingsmallfiberneuropathyinclinicalpracticeadeepphenotypingstudy AT eggermannkatja diagnosingsmallfiberneuropathyinclinicalpracticeadeepphenotypingstudy AT namerbarbara diagnosingsmallfiberneuropathyinclinicalpracticeadeepphenotypingstudy AT grossfranziska diagnosingsmallfiberneuropathyinclinicalpracticeadeepphenotypingstudy AT klitschalexander diagnosingsmallfiberneuropathyinclinicalpracticeadeepphenotypingstudy AT malzachertobias diagnosingsmallfiberneuropathyinclinicalpracticeadeepphenotypingstudy AT kampikdaniel diagnosingsmallfiberneuropathyinclinicalpracticeadeepphenotypingstudy AT malikrayaza diagnosingsmallfiberneuropathyinclinicalpracticeadeepphenotypingstudy AT kurthingo diagnosingsmallfiberneuropathyinclinicalpracticeadeepphenotypingstudy AT sommerclaudia diagnosingsmallfiberneuropathyinclinicalpracticeadeepphenotypingstudy AT uceylernurcan diagnosingsmallfiberneuropathyinclinicalpracticeadeepphenotypingstudy |