Cargando…

Diagnosing small fiber neuropathy in clinical practice: a deep phenotyping study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Small fiber neuropathy (SFN) is increasingly suspected in patients with pain of uncertain origin, and making the diagnosis remains a challenge lacking a diagnostic gold standard. METHODS: In this case–control study, we prospectively recruited 86 patients with a medical history a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Egenolf, Nadine, zu Altenschildesche, Caren Meyer, Kreß, Luisa, Eggermann, Katja, Namer, Barbara, Gross, Franziska, Klitsch, Alexander, Malzacher, Tobias, Kampik, Daniel, Malik, Rayaz A., Kurth, Ingo, Sommer, Claudia, Üçeyler, Nurcan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8283814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34335876
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562864211004318
_version_ 1783723276672958464
author Egenolf, Nadine
zu Altenschildesche, Caren Meyer
Kreß, Luisa
Eggermann, Katja
Namer, Barbara
Gross, Franziska
Klitsch, Alexander
Malzacher, Tobias
Kampik, Daniel
Malik, Rayaz A.
Kurth, Ingo
Sommer, Claudia
Üçeyler, Nurcan
author_facet Egenolf, Nadine
zu Altenschildesche, Caren Meyer
Kreß, Luisa
Eggermann, Katja
Namer, Barbara
Gross, Franziska
Klitsch, Alexander
Malzacher, Tobias
Kampik, Daniel
Malik, Rayaz A.
Kurth, Ingo
Sommer, Claudia
Üçeyler, Nurcan
author_sort Egenolf, Nadine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Small fiber neuropathy (SFN) is increasingly suspected in patients with pain of uncertain origin, and making the diagnosis remains a challenge lacking a diagnostic gold standard. METHODS: In this case–control study, we prospectively recruited 86 patients with a medical history and clinical phenotype suggestive of SFN. Patients underwent neurological examination, quantitative sensory testing (QST), and distal and proximal skin punch biopsy, and were tested for pain-associated gene loci. Fifty-five of these patients additionally underwent pain-related evoked potentials (PREP), corneal confocal microscopy (CCM), and a quantitative sudomotor axon reflex test (QSART). RESULTS: Abnormal distal intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) (60/86, 70%) and neurological examination (53/86, 62%) most frequently reflected small fiber disease. Adding CCM and/or PREP further increased the number of patients with small fiber impairment to 47/55 (85%). Genetic testing revealed potentially pathogenic gene variants in 14/86 (16%) index patients. QST, QSART, and proximal IENFD were of lower impact. CONCLUSION: We propose to diagnose SFN primarily based on the results of neurological examination and distal IENFD, with more detailed phenotyping in specialized centers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8283814
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82838142021-07-30 Diagnosing small fiber neuropathy in clinical practice: a deep phenotyping study Egenolf, Nadine zu Altenschildesche, Caren Meyer Kreß, Luisa Eggermann, Katja Namer, Barbara Gross, Franziska Klitsch, Alexander Malzacher, Tobias Kampik, Daniel Malik, Rayaz A. Kurth, Ingo Sommer, Claudia Üçeyler, Nurcan Ther Adv Neurol Disord Original Research BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Small fiber neuropathy (SFN) is increasingly suspected in patients with pain of uncertain origin, and making the diagnosis remains a challenge lacking a diagnostic gold standard. METHODS: In this case–control study, we prospectively recruited 86 patients with a medical history and clinical phenotype suggestive of SFN. Patients underwent neurological examination, quantitative sensory testing (QST), and distal and proximal skin punch biopsy, and were tested for pain-associated gene loci. Fifty-five of these patients additionally underwent pain-related evoked potentials (PREP), corneal confocal microscopy (CCM), and a quantitative sudomotor axon reflex test (QSART). RESULTS: Abnormal distal intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) (60/86, 70%) and neurological examination (53/86, 62%) most frequently reflected small fiber disease. Adding CCM and/or PREP further increased the number of patients with small fiber impairment to 47/55 (85%). Genetic testing revealed potentially pathogenic gene variants in 14/86 (16%) index patients. QST, QSART, and proximal IENFD were of lower impact. CONCLUSION: We propose to diagnose SFN primarily based on the results of neurological examination and distal IENFD, with more detailed phenotyping in specialized centers. SAGE Publications 2021-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8283814/ /pubmed/34335876 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562864211004318 Text en © The Author(s), 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Egenolf, Nadine
zu Altenschildesche, Caren Meyer
Kreß, Luisa
Eggermann, Katja
Namer, Barbara
Gross, Franziska
Klitsch, Alexander
Malzacher, Tobias
Kampik, Daniel
Malik, Rayaz A.
Kurth, Ingo
Sommer, Claudia
Üçeyler, Nurcan
Diagnosing small fiber neuropathy in clinical practice: a deep phenotyping study
title Diagnosing small fiber neuropathy in clinical practice: a deep phenotyping study
title_full Diagnosing small fiber neuropathy in clinical practice: a deep phenotyping study
title_fullStr Diagnosing small fiber neuropathy in clinical practice: a deep phenotyping study
title_full_unstemmed Diagnosing small fiber neuropathy in clinical practice: a deep phenotyping study
title_short Diagnosing small fiber neuropathy in clinical practice: a deep phenotyping study
title_sort diagnosing small fiber neuropathy in clinical practice: a deep phenotyping study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8283814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34335876
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562864211004318
work_keys_str_mv AT egenolfnadine diagnosingsmallfiberneuropathyinclinicalpracticeadeepphenotypingstudy
AT zualtenschildeschecarenmeyer diagnosingsmallfiberneuropathyinclinicalpracticeadeepphenotypingstudy
AT kreßluisa diagnosingsmallfiberneuropathyinclinicalpracticeadeepphenotypingstudy
AT eggermannkatja diagnosingsmallfiberneuropathyinclinicalpracticeadeepphenotypingstudy
AT namerbarbara diagnosingsmallfiberneuropathyinclinicalpracticeadeepphenotypingstudy
AT grossfranziska diagnosingsmallfiberneuropathyinclinicalpracticeadeepphenotypingstudy
AT klitschalexander diagnosingsmallfiberneuropathyinclinicalpracticeadeepphenotypingstudy
AT malzachertobias diagnosingsmallfiberneuropathyinclinicalpracticeadeepphenotypingstudy
AT kampikdaniel diagnosingsmallfiberneuropathyinclinicalpracticeadeepphenotypingstudy
AT malikrayaza diagnosingsmallfiberneuropathyinclinicalpracticeadeepphenotypingstudy
AT kurthingo diagnosingsmallfiberneuropathyinclinicalpracticeadeepphenotypingstudy
AT sommerclaudia diagnosingsmallfiberneuropathyinclinicalpracticeadeepphenotypingstudy
AT uceylernurcan diagnosingsmallfiberneuropathyinclinicalpracticeadeepphenotypingstudy