Cargando…

Effects of different antibacterial disinfectants on microleakage of bulk-fill composite bonded to different tooth structures

BACKGROUND: This in-vitro study aimed to investigate the effect of two different antibacterial disinfectants on the microleakage performance of newly developed bulk-fill composite, bonded to different tooth structures. METHODS: Class V cavities were prepared in 30 sound premolar teeth, with enamel o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bin-Shuwaish, Mohammed, AlHussaini, Alhanouf, AlHudaithy, Lina, AlDukhiel, Shamma, AlJamhan, Abdullah, Alrahlah, Ali
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8283936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34271908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01717-7
_version_ 1783723299653550080
author Bin-Shuwaish, Mohammed
AlHussaini, Alhanouf
AlHudaithy, Lina
AlDukhiel, Shamma
AlJamhan, Abdullah
Alrahlah, Ali
author_facet Bin-Shuwaish, Mohammed
AlHussaini, Alhanouf
AlHudaithy, Lina
AlDukhiel, Shamma
AlJamhan, Abdullah
Alrahlah, Ali
author_sort Bin-Shuwaish, Mohammed
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This in-vitro study aimed to investigate the effect of two different antibacterial disinfectants on the microleakage performance of newly developed bulk-fill composite, bonded to different tooth structures. METHODS: Class V cavities were prepared in 30 sound premolar teeth, with enamel occlusal margins (OM) and dentin cervical margins (CM). Two disinfectants, 2% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) and Listerine Miswak (ListM), were used. Teeth were divided into three groups (n = 10): G1, Control; G2, CHX; and G3, ListM. Disinfectants were applied to the cavity preparation walls after they were etched with 35% phosphoric acid. The Single Bond Universal adhesive system was then used, and teeth were restored with Filtek One Bulk Fill composite. Samples were examined, after thermocycling aging, by stereomicroscopy for the evaluation of marginal dye penetration. RESULTS: The highest mean microleakage score was reported in the CM of G1 (2.60 ± 1.174), which was significant compared with that of G2 only (p = 0.02). OM in G1 showed no microleakage, with no significant differences found among groups (χ(2) = 1.39, p = 0.50). No significant differences were reported between G2 and G3 (p = 0.45 OM; p = 0.17 CM). CONCLUSIONS: Cavity pretreatment with CHX is not significantly different to pretreatment with CHX. In contrast, CHX improved the cervical marginal seal as compare to the control group (G1).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8283936
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82839362021-07-19 Effects of different antibacterial disinfectants on microleakage of bulk-fill composite bonded to different tooth structures Bin-Shuwaish, Mohammed AlHussaini, Alhanouf AlHudaithy, Lina AlDukhiel, Shamma AlJamhan, Abdullah Alrahlah, Ali BMC Oral Health Research BACKGROUND: This in-vitro study aimed to investigate the effect of two different antibacterial disinfectants on the microleakage performance of newly developed bulk-fill composite, bonded to different tooth structures. METHODS: Class V cavities were prepared in 30 sound premolar teeth, with enamel occlusal margins (OM) and dentin cervical margins (CM). Two disinfectants, 2% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) and Listerine Miswak (ListM), were used. Teeth were divided into three groups (n = 10): G1, Control; G2, CHX; and G3, ListM. Disinfectants were applied to the cavity preparation walls after they were etched with 35% phosphoric acid. The Single Bond Universal adhesive system was then used, and teeth were restored with Filtek One Bulk Fill composite. Samples were examined, after thermocycling aging, by stereomicroscopy for the evaluation of marginal dye penetration. RESULTS: The highest mean microleakage score was reported in the CM of G1 (2.60 ± 1.174), which was significant compared with that of G2 only (p = 0.02). OM in G1 showed no microleakage, with no significant differences found among groups (χ(2) = 1.39, p = 0.50). No significant differences were reported between G2 and G3 (p = 0.45 OM; p = 0.17 CM). CONCLUSIONS: Cavity pretreatment with CHX is not significantly different to pretreatment with CHX. In contrast, CHX improved the cervical marginal seal as compare to the control group (G1). BioMed Central 2021-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8283936/ /pubmed/34271908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01717-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Bin-Shuwaish, Mohammed
AlHussaini, Alhanouf
AlHudaithy, Lina
AlDukhiel, Shamma
AlJamhan, Abdullah
Alrahlah, Ali
Effects of different antibacterial disinfectants on microleakage of bulk-fill composite bonded to different tooth structures
title Effects of different antibacterial disinfectants on microleakage of bulk-fill composite bonded to different tooth structures
title_full Effects of different antibacterial disinfectants on microleakage of bulk-fill composite bonded to different tooth structures
title_fullStr Effects of different antibacterial disinfectants on microleakage of bulk-fill composite bonded to different tooth structures
title_full_unstemmed Effects of different antibacterial disinfectants on microleakage of bulk-fill composite bonded to different tooth structures
title_short Effects of different antibacterial disinfectants on microleakage of bulk-fill composite bonded to different tooth structures
title_sort effects of different antibacterial disinfectants on microleakage of bulk-fill composite bonded to different tooth structures
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8283936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34271908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01717-7
work_keys_str_mv AT binshuwaishmohammed effectsofdifferentantibacterialdisinfectantsonmicroleakageofbulkfillcompositebondedtodifferenttoothstructures
AT alhussainialhanouf effectsofdifferentantibacterialdisinfectantsonmicroleakageofbulkfillcompositebondedtodifferenttoothstructures
AT alhudaithylina effectsofdifferentantibacterialdisinfectantsonmicroleakageofbulkfillcompositebondedtodifferenttoothstructures
AT aldukhielshamma effectsofdifferentantibacterialdisinfectantsonmicroleakageofbulkfillcompositebondedtodifferenttoothstructures
AT aljamhanabdullah effectsofdifferentantibacterialdisinfectantsonmicroleakageofbulkfillcompositebondedtodifferenttoothstructures
AT alrahlahali effectsofdifferentantibacterialdisinfectantsonmicroleakageofbulkfillcompositebondedtodifferenttoothstructures