Cargando…

“Applying Intersectionality in designing and implementing health interventions: a scoping review”

BACKGROUND: Given the potential of intersectionality to identify the causes of inequalities, there is a growing tendency toward applying it in the field of health. Nevertheless, the extent of the application of intersectionality in designing and implementing health interventions is unclear. Therefor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghasemi, Elham, Majdzadeh, Reza, Rajabi, Fatemeh, Vedadhir, AbouAli, Negarandeh, Reza, Jamshidi, Ensiyeh, Takian, Amirhossein, Faraji, Zahra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8283959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34271905
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11449-6
_version_ 1783723303167328256
author Ghasemi, Elham
Majdzadeh, Reza
Rajabi, Fatemeh
Vedadhir, AbouAli
Negarandeh, Reza
Jamshidi, Ensiyeh
Takian, Amirhossein
Faraji, Zahra
author_facet Ghasemi, Elham
Majdzadeh, Reza
Rajabi, Fatemeh
Vedadhir, AbouAli
Negarandeh, Reza
Jamshidi, Ensiyeh
Takian, Amirhossein
Faraji, Zahra
author_sort Ghasemi, Elham
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Given the potential of intersectionality to identify the causes of inequalities, there is a growing tendency toward applying it in the field of health. Nevertheless, the extent of the application of intersectionality in designing and implementing health interventions is unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the extent to which previous studies have applied intersectionality and its principles in designing and implementing health interventions. METHODS: The title and abstract of the articles which were published in different databases e.g. PubMed, Web of Science, Proquest, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, and PsychInfo were screened. Those articles that met the screening criteria were reviewed in full text. The data about the application of principles of intersectionality, according to the stages heuristic model (problem identification, design & implementation, and evaluation), were extracted through a 38-item researcher-made checklist. RESULTS: Initially, 2677 articles were found through reviewing the target databases. After removing the duplicated ones and screening the titles and abstracts of 1601 studies, 107 articles were selected to be reviewed in detail and 4 articles could meet the criteria. The most frequently considered intersectionality principles were “intersecting categories” and “power”, particularly at the stages of ‘problem identification’ as well as ‘design & implementation’. The results showed that “multilevel analysis” principle received less attention; most of the studies conducted the interventions at the micro level and did not aim at bringing about change at structural levels. There was a lack of clarity regarding the attention to some of the main items of principles such as “reflexivity” as well as “social justice and equity". These principles might have been implemented in the selected articles; however, the authors have not explicitly discussed them in their studies. CONCLUSIONS: Given the small number of included studies, there is still insufficient evidence within empirical studies to show the implication of intersectionality in designing and conducting health interventions. To operationalize the intersectionality, there is a need to address the principles at various stages of health policies and interventions. To this end, designing and availability of user-friendly tools may help researchers and health policymakers appropriately apply the intersectionality. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-021-11449-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8283959
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82839592021-07-19 “Applying Intersectionality in designing and implementing health interventions: a scoping review” Ghasemi, Elham Majdzadeh, Reza Rajabi, Fatemeh Vedadhir, AbouAli Negarandeh, Reza Jamshidi, Ensiyeh Takian, Amirhossein Faraji, Zahra BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Given the potential of intersectionality to identify the causes of inequalities, there is a growing tendency toward applying it in the field of health. Nevertheless, the extent of the application of intersectionality in designing and implementing health interventions is unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the extent to which previous studies have applied intersectionality and its principles in designing and implementing health interventions. METHODS: The title and abstract of the articles which were published in different databases e.g. PubMed, Web of Science, Proquest, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, and PsychInfo were screened. Those articles that met the screening criteria were reviewed in full text. The data about the application of principles of intersectionality, according to the stages heuristic model (problem identification, design & implementation, and evaluation), were extracted through a 38-item researcher-made checklist. RESULTS: Initially, 2677 articles were found through reviewing the target databases. After removing the duplicated ones and screening the titles and abstracts of 1601 studies, 107 articles were selected to be reviewed in detail and 4 articles could meet the criteria. The most frequently considered intersectionality principles were “intersecting categories” and “power”, particularly at the stages of ‘problem identification’ as well as ‘design & implementation’. The results showed that “multilevel analysis” principle received less attention; most of the studies conducted the interventions at the micro level and did not aim at bringing about change at structural levels. There was a lack of clarity regarding the attention to some of the main items of principles such as “reflexivity” as well as “social justice and equity". These principles might have been implemented in the selected articles; however, the authors have not explicitly discussed them in their studies. CONCLUSIONS: Given the small number of included studies, there is still insufficient evidence within empirical studies to show the implication of intersectionality in designing and conducting health interventions. To operationalize the intersectionality, there is a need to address the principles at various stages of health policies and interventions. To this end, designing and availability of user-friendly tools may help researchers and health policymakers appropriately apply the intersectionality. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-021-11449-6. BioMed Central 2021-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8283959/ /pubmed/34271905 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11449-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ghasemi, Elham
Majdzadeh, Reza
Rajabi, Fatemeh
Vedadhir, AbouAli
Negarandeh, Reza
Jamshidi, Ensiyeh
Takian, Amirhossein
Faraji, Zahra
“Applying Intersectionality in designing and implementing health interventions: a scoping review”
title “Applying Intersectionality in designing and implementing health interventions: a scoping review”
title_full “Applying Intersectionality in designing and implementing health interventions: a scoping review”
title_fullStr “Applying Intersectionality in designing and implementing health interventions: a scoping review”
title_full_unstemmed “Applying Intersectionality in designing and implementing health interventions: a scoping review”
title_short “Applying Intersectionality in designing and implementing health interventions: a scoping review”
title_sort “applying intersectionality in designing and implementing health interventions: a scoping review”
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8283959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34271905
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11449-6
work_keys_str_mv AT ghasemielham applyingintersectionalityindesigningandimplementinghealthinterventionsascopingreview
AT majdzadehreza applyingintersectionalityindesigningandimplementinghealthinterventionsascopingreview
AT rajabifatemeh applyingintersectionalityindesigningandimplementinghealthinterventionsascopingreview
AT vedadhirabouali applyingintersectionalityindesigningandimplementinghealthinterventionsascopingreview
AT negarandehreza applyingintersectionalityindesigningandimplementinghealthinterventionsascopingreview
AT jamshidiensiyeh applyingintersectionalityindesigningandimplementinghealthinterventionsascopingreview
AT takianamirhossein applyingintersectionalityindesigningandimplementinghealthinterventionsascopingreview
AT farajizahra applyingintersectionalityindesigningandimplementinghealthinterventionsascopingreview