Cargando…
An Internet-based emotion regulation intervention versus no intervention for non-suicidal self-injury in adolescents: a statistical analysis plan for a feasibility randomised clinical trial
BACKGROUND: Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) has a lifetime prevalence of 17% in adolescents in the general population and up to 74% in adolescents with psychiatric disorders. NSSI is one of the most important predictors of later suicidal behaviour and death by suicide. The TEENS feasibility trial wa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8283974/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34271984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05406-2 |
_version_ | 1783723305798205440 |
---|---|
author | Olsen, Markus Harboe Morthorst, Britt Pagsberg, Anne Katrine Heinrichsen, Michella Møhl, Bo Rubæk, Lotte Bjureberg, Johan Simonsson, Olivia Lindschou, Jane Gluud, Christian Jakobsen, Janus Christian |
author_facet | Olsen, Markus Harboe Morthorst, Britt Pagsberg, Anne Katrine Heinrichsen, Michella Møhl, Bo Rubæk, Lotte Bjureberg, Johan Simonsson, Olivia Lindschou, Jane Gluud, Christian Jakobsen, Janus Christian |
author_sort | Olsen, Markus Harboe |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) has a lifetime prevalence of 17% in adolescents in the general population and up to 74% in adolescents with psychiatric disorders. NSSI is one of the most important predictors of later suicidal behaviour and death by suicide. The TEENS feasibility trial was initiated to assess the feasibility and safety of Internet-based Emotion Regulation Individual Therapy for Adolescents (ERITA) as an add-on to treatment as usual in 13–17-year-old patients with NSSI referred to the Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services. METHODS: The TEENS feasibility trial is a randomised clinical trial with a parallel-group design. The trial intervention is an 11-week online therapy which is tested as an add-on to treatment as usual versus treatment as usual. The primary feasibility outcomes are the fraction of participants who (1) completed 12 weeks of follow-up interview or assessment, (2) consented to inclusion and randomisation out of all eligible participants, and (3) were compliant with the experimental intervention, assessed as completion of at least six out of eleven modules in the programme. Since this is a feasibility trial, we did not predefine a required sample size. The exploratory clinical outcome, the frequency of NSSI episodes, assessed using Deliberate Self-Harm Inventory – Youth version (DSHI-Y), at the end of intervention, is planned to be the future primary outcome in a larger pragmatic definitive randomised clinical trial. After completion of the feasibility trial, blinded data will be analysed by two independent statisticians blinded to the intervention, where ‘A’ and ‘B’ refer to the two groups. A third party will compare these reports, and discrepancies will be discussed. The statistical report with the analyses chosen for the manuscript is being tracked using a version control system, and both statistical reports will be published as a supplementary material. Based on the final statistical report, two blinded conclusions will be drawn by the steering group. DISCUSSION: We present a pre-defined statistical analysis plan for the TEENS feasibility trial, which limits bias, p-hacking, data-driven interpretations. This statistical analysis plan is accompanied by a pre-programmed version-controlled statistical report with simulated data, which increases transparency and reproducibility. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.govNCT04243603. Registered on 28 January 2020 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-021-05406-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8283974 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82839742021-07-19 An Internet-based emotion regulation intervention versus no intervention for non-suicidal self-injury in adolescents: a statistical analysis plan for a feasibility randomised clinical trial Olsen, Markus Harboe Morthorst, Britt Pagsberg, Anne Katrine Heinrichsen, Michella Møhl, Bo Rubæk, Lotte Bjureberg, Johan Simonsson, Olivia Lindschou, Jane Gluud, Christian Jakobsen, Janus Christian Trials Update BACKGROUND: Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) has a lifetime prevalence of 17% in adolescents in the general population and up to 74% in adolescents with psychiatric disorders. NSSI is one of the most important predictors of later suicidal behaviour and death by suicide. The TEENS feasibility trial was initiated to assess the feasibility and safety of Internet-based Emotion Regulation Individual Therapy for Adolescents (ERITA) as an add-on to treatment as usual in 13–17-year-old patients with NSSI referred to the Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services. METHODS: The TEENS feasibility trial is a randomised clinical trial with a parallel-group design. The trial intervention is an 11-week online therapy which is tested as an add-on to treatment as usual versus treatment as usual. The primary feasibility outcomes are the fraction of participants who (1) completed 12 weeks of follow-up interview or assessment, (2) consented to inclusion and randomisation out of all eligible participants, and (3) were compliant with the experimental intervention, assessed as completion of at least six out of eleven modules in the programme. Since this is a feasibility trial, we did not predefine a required sample size. The exploratory clinical outcome, the frequency of NSSI episodes, assessed using Deliberate Self-Harm Inventory – Youth version (DSHI-Y), at the end of intervention, is planned to be the future primary outcome in a larger pragmatic definitive randomised clinical trial. After completion of the feasibility trial, blinded data will be analysed by two independent statisticians blinded to the intervention, where ‘A’ and ‘B’ refer to the two groups. A third party will compare these reports, and discrepancies will be discussed. The statistical report with the analyses chosen for the manuscript is being tracked using a version control system, and both statistical reports will be published as a supplementary material. Based on the final statistical report, two blinded conclusions will be drawn by the steering group. DISCUSSION: We present a pre-defined statistical analysis plan for the TEENS feasibility trial, which limits bias, p-hacking, data-driven interpretations. This statistical analysis plan is accompanied by a pre-programmed version-controlled statistical report with simulated data, which increases transparency and reproducibility. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.govNCT04243603. Registered on 28 January 2020 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-021-05406-2. BioMed Central 2021-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8283974/ /pubmed/34271984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05406-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Update Olsen, Markus Harboe Morthorst, Britt Pagsberg, Anne Katrine Heinrichsen, Michella Møhl, Bo Rubæk, Lotte Bjureberg, Johan Simonsson, Olivia Lindschou, Jane Gluud, Christian Jakobsen, Janus Christian An Internet-based emotion regulation intervention versus no intervention for non-suicidal self-injury in adolescents: a statistical analysis plan for a feasibility randomised clinical trial |
title | An Internet-based emotion regulation intervention versus no intervention for non-suicidal self-injury in adolescents: a statistical analysis plan for a feasibility randomised clinical trial |
title_full | An Internet-based emotion regulation intervention versus no intervention for non-suicidal self-injury in adolescents: a statistical analysis plan for a feasibility randomised clinical trial |
title_fullStr | An Internet-based emotion regulation intervention versus no intervention for non-suicidal self-injury in adolescents: a statistical analysis plan for a feasibility randomised clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed | An Internet-based emotion regulation intervention versus no intervention for non-suicidal self-injury in adolescents: a statistical analysis plan for a feasibility randomised clinical trial |
title_short | An Internet-based emotion regulation intervention versus no intervention for non-suicidal self-injury in adolescents: a statistical analysis plan for a feasibility randomised clinical trial |
title_sort | internet-based emotion regulation intervention versus no intervention for non-suicidal self-injury in adolescents: a statistical analysis plan for a feasibility randomised clinical trial |
topic | Update |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8283974/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34271984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05406-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT olsenmarkusharboe aninternetbasedemotionregulationinterventionversusnointerventionfornonsuicidalselfinjuryinadolescentsastatisticalanalysisplanforafeasibilityrandomisedclinicaltrial AT morthorstbritt aninternetbasedemotionregulationinterventionversusnointerventionfornonsuicidalselfinjuryinadolescentsastatisticalanalysisplanforafeasibilityrandomisedclinicaltrial AT pagsbergannekatrine aninternetbasedemotionregulationinterventionversusnointerventionfornonsuicidalselfinjuryinadolescentsastatisticalanalysisplanforafeasibilityrandomisedclinicaltrial AT heinrichsenmichella aninternetbasedemotionregulationinterventionversusnointerventionfornonsuicidalselfinjuryinadolescentsastatisticalanalysisplanforafeasibilityrandomisedclinicaltrial AT møhlbo aninternetbasedemotionregulationinterventionversusnointerventionfornonsuicidalselfinjuryinadolescentsastatisticalanalysisplanforafeasibilityrandomisedclinicaltrial AT rubæklotte aninternetbasedemotionregulationinterventionversusnointerventionfornonsuicidalselfinjuryinadolescentsastatisticalanalysisplanforafeasibilityrandomisedclinicaltrial AT bjurebergjohan aninternetbasedemotionregulationinterventionversusnointerventionfornonsuicidalselfinjuryinadolescentsastatisticalanalysisplanforafeasibilityrandomisedclinicaltrial AT simonssonolivia aninternetbasedemotionregulationinterventionversusnointerventionfornonsuicidalselfinjuryinadolescentsastatisticalanalysisplanforafeasibilityrandomisedclinicaltrial AT lindschoujane aninternetbasedemotionregulationinterventionversusnointerventionfornonsuicidalselfinjuryinadolescentsastatisticalanalysisplanforafeasibilityrandomisedclinicaltrial AT gluudchristian aninternetbasedemotionregulationinterventionversusnointerventionfornonsuicidalselfinjuryinadolescentsastatisticalanalysisplanforafeasibilityrandomisedclinicaltrial AT jakobsenjanuschristian aninternetbasedemotionregulationinterventionversusnointerventionfornonsuicidalselfinjuryinadolescentsastatisticalanalysisplanforafeasibilityrandomisedclinicaltrial AT olsenmarkusharboe internetbasedemotionregulationinterventionversusnointerventionfornonsuicidalselfinjuryinadolescentsastatisticalanalysisplanforafeasibilityrandomisedclinicaltrial AT morthorstbritt internetbasedemotionregulationinterventionversusnointerventionfornonsuicidalselfinjuryinadolescentsastatisticalanalysisplanforafeasibilityrandomisedclinicaltrial AT pagsbergannekatrine internetbasedemotionregulationinterventionversusnointerventionfornonsuicidalselfinjuryinadolescentsastatisticalanalysisplanforafeasibilityrandomisedclinicaltrial AT heinrichsenmichella internetbasedemotionregulationinterventionversusnointerventionfornonsuicidalselfinjuryinadolescentsastatisticalanalysisplanforafeasibilityrandomisedclinicaltrial AT møhlbo internetbasedemotionregulationinterventionversusnointerventionfornonsuicidalselfinjuryinadolescentsastatisticalanalysisplanforafeasibilityrandomisedclinicaltrial AT rubæklotte internetbasedemotionregulationinterventionversusnointerventionfornonsuicidalselfinjuryinadolescentsastatisticalanalysisplanforafeasibilityrandomisedclinicaltrial AT bjurebergjohan internetbasedemotionregulationinterventionversusnointerventionfornonsuicidalselfinjuryinadolescentsastatisticalanalysisplanforafeasibilityrandomisedclinicaltrial AT simonssonolivia internetbasedemotionregulationinterventionversusnointerventionfornonsuicidalselfinjuryinadolescentsastatisticalanalysisplanforafeasibilityrandomisedclinicaltrial AT lindschoujane internetbasedemotionregulationinterventionversusnointerventionfornonsuicidalselfinjuryinadolescentsastatisticalanalysisplanforafeasibilityrandomisedclinicaltrial AT gluudchristian internetbasedemotionregulationinterventionversusnointerventionfornonsuicidalselfinjuryinadolescentsastatisticalanalysisplanforafeasibilityrandomisedclinicaltrial AT jakobsenjanuschristian internetbasedemotionregulationinterventionversusnointerventionfornonsuicidalselfinjuryinadolescentsastatisticalanalysisplanforafeasibilityrandomisedclinicaltrial |