Cargando…

Perceived diversity in software engineering: a systematic literature review

We define perceived diversity as the diversity factors that individuals are born with. Perceived diversity in Software Engineering has been recognized as a high-value team property and companies are willing to increase their efforts to create more diverse work teams. The current diversity state-of-t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rodríguez-Pérez, Gema, Nadri, Reza, Nagappan, Meiyappan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8284041/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34305441
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10664-021-09992-2
_version_ 1783723318708273152
author Rodríguez-Pérez, Gema
Nadri, Reza
Nagappan, Meiyappan
author_facet Rodríguez-Pérez, Gema
Nadri, Reza
Nagappan, Meiyappan
author_sort Rodríguez-Pérez, Gema
collection PubMed
description We define perceived diversity as the diversity factors that individuals are born with. Perceived diversity in Software Engineering has been recognized as a high-value team property and companies are willing to increase their efforts to create more diverse work teams. The current diversity state-of-the-art shows that gender diversity studies have been growing during the past decade, and they have shown the benefits of including women in software teams. However, less is known about how other perceived diversity factors such as race, nationality, disability, and age of developers are related to Software Engineering. Through a systematic literature review, we aim to clarify the research area concerned with perceived diversity in Software Engineering. Our goal is to identify (1) what issues have been studied and what results have been reported; (2) what methods, tools, models, and processes have been proposed to help perceived diversity issues; and (3) what limitations have been reported when studying perceived diversity in Software Engineering. Furthermore, our ultimate goal is to identify gaps in the current literature and create a call for future action in perceived diversity in Software Engineering. Our results indicate that the individual studies have typically had a gender diversity perspective focusing on showing gender bias or gender differences instead of developing methods and tools to mitigate the gender diversity issues faced in SE. Moreover, perceived diversity aspects related to SE participants’ race, age, and disability need to be further analyzed in Software Engineering research. From our systematic literature review, we conclude that researchers need to consider a wider set of perceived diversity aspects for future research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8284041
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82840412021-07-19 Perceived diversity in software engineering: a systematic literature review Rodríguez-Pérez, Gema Nadri, Reza Nagappan, Meiyappan Empir Softw Eng Article We define perceived diversity as the diversity factors that individuals are born with. Perceived diversity in Software Engineering has been recognized as a high-value team property and companies are willing to increase their efforts to create more diverse work teams. The current diversity state-of-the-art shows that gender diversity studies have been growing during the past decade, and they have shown the benefits of including women in software teams. However, less is known about how other perceived diversity factors such as race, nationality, disability, and age of developers are related to Software Engineering. Through a systematic literature review, we aim to clarify the research area concerned with perceived diversity in Software Engineering. Our goal is to identify (1) what issues have been studied and what results have been reported; (2) what methods, tools, models, and processes have been proposed to help perceived diversity issues; and (3) what limitations have been reported when studying perceived diversity in Software Engineering. Furthermore, our ultimate goal is to identify gaps in the current literature and create a call for future action in perceived diversity in Software Engineering. Our results indicate that the individual studies have typically had a gender diversity perspective focusing on showing gender bias or gender differences instead of developing methods and tools to mitigate the gender diversity issues faced in SE. Moreover, perceived diversity aspects related to SE participants’ race, age, and disability need to be further analyzed in Software Engineering research. From our systematic literature review, we conclude that researchers need to consider a wider set of perceived diversity aspects for future research. Springer US 2021-07-16 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8284041/ /pubmed/34305441 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10664-021-09992-2 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Article
Rodríguez-Pérez, Gema
Nadri, Reza
Nagappan, Meiyappan
Perceived diversity in software engineering: a systematic literature review
title Perceived diversity in software engineering: a systematic literature review
title_full Perceived diversity in software engineering: a systematic literature review
title_fullStr Perceived diversity in software engineering: a systematic literature review
title_full_unstemmed Perceived diversity in software engineering: a systematic literature review
title_short Perceived diversity in software engineering: a systematic literature review
title_sort perceived diversity in software engineering: a systematic literature review
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8284041/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34305441
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10664-021-09992-2
work_keys_str_mv AT rodriguezperezgema perceiveddiversityinsoftwareengineeringasystematicliteraturereview
AT nadrireza perceiveddiversityinsoftwareengineeringasystematicliteraturereview
AT nagappanmeiyappan perceiveddiversityinsoftwareengineeringasystematicliteraturereview