Cargando…

Probiotic and commensal gut microbial therapies in multiple sclerosis and its animal models: a comprehensive review

The need for alternative treatments for multiple sclerosis (MS) has triggered copious amounts of research into microbial therapies focused on manipulating the microbiota–gut–brain axis. This comprehensive review was intended to present and systematically evaluate the current clinical and preclinical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blais, Lorrie L., Montgomery, Theresa L., Amiel, Eyal, Deming, Paula B., Krementsov, Dimitry N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8284149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34264791
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2021.1943289
_version_ 1783723339707056128
author Blais, Lorrie L.
Montgomery, Theresa L.
Amiel, Eyal
Deming, Paula B.
Krementsov, Dimitry N.
author_facet Blais, Lorrie L.
Montgomery, Theresa L.
Amiel, Eyal
Deming, Paula B.
Krementsov, Dimitry N.
author_sort Blais, Lorrie L.
collection PubMed
description The need for alternative treatments for multiple sclerosis (MS) has triggered copious amounts of research into microbial therapies focused on manipulating the microbiota–gut–brain axis. This comprehensive review was intended to present and systematically evaluate the current clinical and preclinical evidence for various probiotic and commensal gut microbial therapies as treatments for MS, using the Bradford Hill criteria (BHC) as a multi-parameter assessment rubric. Literature searches were performed to identify a total of 37 relevant studies (6 human, 31 animal), including 28 probiotic therapy and 9 commensal therapy studies. In addition to presenting qualitative summaries of these findings, therapeutic evidence for each bacterial formulation was assessed using the BHC to generate summative scores. These scores, which encompassed study quality, replication, and other considerations, were used to rank the most promising therapies and highlight deficiencies. Several therapeutic formulations, including VSL#3, Lactobacillus paracasei, Bifidobacterium animalis, E. coli Nissle 1917, and Prevotella histicola, emerged as the most promising. In contrast, a number of other therapies were hindered by limited evidence of replicable findings and other criteria, which need to be addressed by future studies in order to harness gut microbial therapies to ultimately provide cheaper, safer, and more durable treatments for MS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8284149
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82841492021-08-02 Probiotic and commensal gut microbial therapies in multiple sclerosis and its animal models: a comprehensive review Blais, Lorrie L. Montgomery, Theresa L. Amiel, Eyal Deming, Paula B. Krementsov, Dimitry N. Gut Microbes Review The need for alternative treatments for multiple sclerosis (MS) has triggered copious amounts of research into microbial therapies focused on manipulating the microbiota–gut–brain axis. This comprehensive review was intended to present and systematically evaluate the current clinical and preclinical evidence for various probiotic and commensal gut microbial therapies as treatments for MS, using the Bradford Hill criteria (BHC) as a multi-parameter assessment rubric. Literature searches were performed to identify a total of 37 relevant studies (6 human, 31 animal), including 28 probiotic therapy and 9 commensal therapy studies. In addition to presenting qualitative summaries of these findings, therapeutic evidence for each bacterial formulation was assessed using the BHC to generate summative scores. These scores, which encompassed study quality, replication, and other considerations, were used to rank the most promising therapies and highlight deficiencies. Several therapeutic formulations, including VSL#3, Lactobacillus paracasei, Bifidobacterium animalis, E. coli Nissle 1917, and Prevotella histicola, emerged as the most promising. In contrast, a number of other therapies were hindered by limited evidence of replicable findings and other criteria, which need to be addressed by future studies in order to harness gut microbial therapies to ultimately provide cheaper, safer, and more durable treatments for MS. Taylor & Francis 2021-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8284149/ /pubmed/34264791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2021.1943289 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Blais, Lorrie L.
Montgomery, Theresa L.
Amiel, Eyal
Deming, Paula B.
Krementsov, Dimitry N.
Probiotic and commensal gut microbial therapies in multiple sclerosis and its animal models: a comprehensive review
title Probiotic and commensal gut microbial therapies in multiple sclerosis and its animal models: a comprehensive review
title_full Probiotic and commensal gut microbial therapies in multiple sclerosis and its animal models: a comprehensive review
title_fullStr Probiotic and commensal gut microbial therapies in multiple sclerosis and its animal models: a comprehensive review
title_full_unstemmed Probiotic and commensal gut microbial therapies in multiple sclerosis and its animal models: a comprehensive review
title_short Probiotic and commensal gut microbial therapies in multiple sclerosis and its animal models: a comprehensive review
title_sort probiotic and commensal gut microbial therapies in multiple sclerosis and its animal models: a comprehensive review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8284149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34264791
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2021.1943289
work_keys_str_mv AT blaislorriel probioticandcommensalgutmicrobialtherapiesinmultiplesclerosisanditsanimalmodelsacomprehensivereview
AT montgomerytheresal probioticandcommensalgutmicrobialtherapiesinmultiplesclerosisanditsanimalmodelsacomprehensivereview
AT amieleyal probioticandcommensalgutmicrobialtherapiesinmultiplesclerosisanditsanimalmodelsacomprehensivereview
AT demingpaulab probioticandcommensalgutmicrobialtherapiesinmultiplesclerosisanditsanimalmodelsacomprehensivereview
AT krementsovdimitryn probioticandcommensalgutmicrobialtherapiesinmultiplesclerosisanditsanimalmodelsacomprehensivereview