Cargando…

Determination of Biological Age: Geriatric Assessment vs Biological Biomarkers

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Biological age is the concept of using biophysiological measures to more accurately determine an individual’s age-related risk of adverse outcomes. Grading of the degree of frailty and measuring biomarkers are distinct methods of measuring biological age. This review compares thes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Diebel, Lucas W. M., Rockwood, Kenneth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8284182/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34269912
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11912-021-01097-9
_version_ 1783723346826887168
author Diebel, Lucas W. M.
Rockwood, Kenneth
author_facet Diebel, Lucas W. M.
Rockwood, Kenneth
author_sort Diebel, Lucas W. M.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Biological age is the concept of using biophysiological measures to more accurately determine an individual’s age-related risk of adverse outcomes. Grading of the degree of frailty and measuring biomarkers are distinct methods of measuring biological age. This review compares these strategies for estimating biological age for clinical purposes. RECENT FINDINGS: The degree of frailty predicts susceptibility to adverse outcomes independently of chronological age. The utility of this approach has been demonstrated across a range of clinical contexts. Biomarkers from various levels of the biological aging process are improving in accuracy, with the potential to identify aberrant aging trajectories before the onset of clinically manifest frailty. SUMMARY: Grading of frailty is a demonstrably, clinically, and research-relevant proxy estimate of biological age. Emerging biomarkers can supplement this approach by identifying accelerated aging before it is clinically apparent. Some biomarkers may even offer a means by which interventions to reduce the rate of aging can be developed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8284182
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82841822021-07-19 Determination of Biological Age: Geriatric Assessment vs Biological Biomarkers Diebel, Lucas W. M. Rockwood, Kenneth Curr Oncol Rep Geriatric Oncology (L Balducci, Section Editor) PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Biological age is the concept of using biophysiological measures to more accurately determine an individual’s age-related risk of adverse outcomes. Grading of the degree of frailty and measuring biomarkers are distinct methods of measuring biological age. This review compares these strategies for estimating biological age for clinical purposes. RECENT FINDINGS: The degree of frailty predicts susceptibility to adverse outcomes independently of chronological age. The utility of this approach has been demonstrated across a range of clinical contexts. Biomarkers from various levels of the biological aging process are improving in accuracy, with the potential to identify aberrant aging trajectories before the onset of clinically manifest frailty. SUMMARY: Grading of frailty is a demonstrably, clinically, and research-relevant proxy estimate of biological age. Emerging biomarkers can supplement this approach by identifying accelerated aging before it is clinically apparent. Some biomarkers may even offer a means by which interventions to reduce the rate of aging can be developed. Springer US 2021-07-16 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8284182/ /pubmed/34269912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11912-021-01097-9 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Geriatric Oncology (L Balducci, Section Editor)
Diebel, Lucas W. M.
Rockwood, Kenneth
Determination of Biological Age: Geriatric Assessment vs Biological Biomarkers
title Determination of Biological Age: Geriatric Assessment vs Biological Biomarkers
title_full Determination of Biological Age: Geriatric Assessment vs Biological Biomarkers
title_fullStr Determination of Biological Age: Geriatric Assessment vs Biological Biomarkers
title_full_unstemmed Determination of Biological Age: Geriatric Assessment vs Biological Biomarkers
title_short Determination of Biological Age: Geriatric Assessment vs Biological Biomarkers
title_sort determination of biological age: geriatric assessment vs biological biomarkers
topic Geriatric Oncology (L Balducci, Section Editor)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8284182/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34269912
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11912-021-01097-9
work_keys_str_mv AT diebellucaswm determinationofbiologicalagegeriatricassessmentvsbiologicalbiomarkers
AT rockwoodkenneth determinationofbiologicalagegeriatricassessmentvsbiologicalbiomarkers