Cargando…
Determination of Biological Age: Geriatric Assessment vs Biological Biomarkers
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Biological age is the concept of using biophysiological measures to more accurately determine an individual’s age-related risk of adverse outcomes. Grading of the degree of frailty and measuring biomarkers are distinct methods of measuring biological age. This review compares thes...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8284182/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34269912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11912-021-01097-9 |
_version_ | 1783723346826887168 |
---|---|
author | Diebel, Lucas W. M. Rockwood, Kenneth |
author_facet | Diebel, Lucas W. M. Rockwood, Kenneth |
author_sort | Diebel, Lucas W. M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Biological age is the concept of using biophysiological measures to more accurately determine an individual’s age-related risk of adverse outcomes. Grading of the degree of frailty and measuring biomarkers are distinct methods of measuring biological age. This review compares these strategies for estimating biological age for clinical purposes. RECENT FINDINGS: The degree of frailty predicts susceptibility to adverse outcomes independently of chronological age. The utility of this approach has been demonstrated across a range of clinical contexts. Biomarkers from various levels of the biological aging process are improving in accuracy, with the potential to identify aberrant aging trajectories before the onset of clinically manifest frailty. SUMMARY: Grading of frailty is a demonstrably, clinically, and research-relevant proxy estimate of biological age. Emerging biomarkers can supplement this approach by identifying accelerated aging before it is clinically apparent. Some biomarkers may even offer a means by which interventions to reduce the rate of aging can be developed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8284182 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82841822021-07-19 Determination of Biological Age: Geriatric Assessment vs Biological Biomarkers Diebel, Lucas W. M. Rockwood, Kenneth Curr Oncol Rep Geriatric Oncology (L Balducci, Section Editor) PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Biological age is the concept of using biophysiological measures to more accurately determine an individual’s age-related risk of adverse outcomes. Grading of the degree of frailty and measuring biomarkers are distinct methods of measuring biological age. This review compares these strategies for estimating biological age for clinical purposes. RECENT FINDINGS: The degree of frailty predicts susceptibility to adverse outcomes independently of chronological age. The utility of this approach has been demonstrated across a range of clinical contexts. Biomarkers from various levels of the biological aging process are improving in accuracy, with the potential to identify aberrant aging trajectories before the onset of clinically manifest frailty. SUMMARY: Grading of frailty is a demonstrably, clinically, and research-relevant proxy estimate of biological age. Emerging biomarkers can supplement this approach by identifying accelerated aging before it is clinically apparent. Some biomarkers may even offer a means by which interventions to reduce the rate of aging can be developed. Springer US 2021-07-16 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8284182/ /pubmed/34269912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11912-021-01097-9 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Geriatric Oncology (L Balducci, Section Editor) Diebel, Lucas W. M. Rockwood, Kenneth Determination of Biological Age: Geriatric Assessment vs Biological Biomarkers |
title | Determination of Biological Age: Geriatric Assessment vs Biological Biomarkers |
title_full | Determination of Biological Age: Geriatric Assessment vs Biological Biomarkers |
title_fullStr | Determination of Biological Age: Geriatric Assessment vs Biological Biomarkers |
title_full_unstemmed | Determination of Biological Age: Geriatric Assessment vs Biological Biomarkers |
title_short | Determination of Biological Age: Geriatric Assessment vs Biological Biomarkers |
title_sort | determination of biological age: geriatric assessment vs biological biomarkers |
topic | Geriatric Oncology (L Balducci, Section Editor) |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8284182/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34269912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11912-021-01097-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT diebellucaswm determinationofbiologicalagegeriatricassessmentvsbiologicalbiomarkers AT rockwoodkenneth determinationofbiologicalagegeriatricassessmentvsbiologicalbiomarkers |