Cargando…
Gaps, Challenges, and Opportunities for Global Health Leadership Training
BACKGROUND: Global Health Leadership (GHL) programs are essential for training emerging health care professionals to be effective leaders. Synthesizing knowledge acquired through experience implementing GHL programs can inform future recommendations for GHL. OBJECTIVE: To describe the lessons learne...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Ubiquity Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8284509/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34307065 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/aogh.3219 |
_version_ | 1783723403776098304 |
---|---|
author | Voss, Joachim Yasobant, Sandul Akridge, Anike Tarimo, Edith Seloilwe, Esther Hausner, David Mashalla, Yohana |
author_facet | Voss, Joachim Yasobant, Sandul Akridge, Anike Tarimo, Edith Seloilwe, Esther Hausner, David Mashalla, Yohana |
author_sort | Voss, Joachim |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Global Health Leadership (GHL) programs are essential for training emerging health care professionals to be effective leaders. Synthesizing knowledge acquired through experience implementing GHL programs can inform future recommendations for GHL. OBJECTIVE: To describe the lessons learned, highlighting gaps, challenges and opportunities, during implementation of two GHL capacity building programs, namely the Afya Bora Consortium Fellowship in Global Health Leadership and the Sustaining Technical and Analytic Resources (STAR) fellowship and internship program for global health professionals. METHODS: A mixed methods case-comparison study was conducted, using qualitative data (expert opinion) collected from the Program Directors in order to understand the experiences of the two GHL programs. A structured response guide was used to assess the overall experience in GHL program implementation, operational challenges and reported gaps. Afya Bora and STAR have been implemented for 8 and 2.5 years respectively. Thus, the analysis reflects a snapshot of the two programs at different stages. FINDINGS: The results reflect knowledge gained through extensive experience in implementing the two GHL programs. Afya Bora has trained 188 multi-disciplinary fellows, and 100% of the African fellows are engaged in leadership positions in government departments and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in their countries. STAR has placed 147 participants (89 fellows and 58 interns) in more than 25 countries globally. Both programs were successful in strengthening south-south and north-south collaborations for a common goal of improving global health. Implementation of both fellowships identified room for improvement in operational procedures and financing of the programs, and highlighted knowledge and skills gaps, as well as challenges in sustainability of the training programs. CONCLUSIONS: Afya Bora and STAR have had significant impact and have contributed to changing the leadership landscape in global health. Future GHL programs should address sustainability in terms of financing, delivery modalities and domestic integration of knowledge. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8284509 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Ubiquity Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82845092021-07-23 Gaps, Challenges, and Opportunities for Global Health Leadership Training Voss, Joachim Yasobant, Sandul Akridge, Anike Tarimo, Edith Seloilwe, Esther Hausner, David Mashalla, Yohana Ann Glob Health Expert Consensus Document BACKGROUND: Global Health Leadership (GHL) programs are essential for training emerging health care professionals to be effective leaders. Synthesizing knowledge acquired through experience implementing GHL programs can inform future recommendations for GHL. OBJECTIVE: To describe the lessons learned, highlighting gaps, challenges and opportunities, during implementation of two GHL capacity building programs, namely the Afya Bora Consortium Fellowship in Global Health Leadership and the Sustaining Technical and Analytic Resources (STAR) fellowship and internship program for global health professionals. METHODS: A mixed methods case-comparison study was conducted, using qualitative data (expert opinion) collected from the Program Directors in order to understand the experiences of the two GHL programs. A structured response guide was used to assess the overall experience in GHL program implementation, operational challenges and reported gaps. Afya Bora and STAR have been implemented for 8 and 2.5 years respectively. Thus, the analysis reflects a snapshot of the two programs at different stages. FINDINGS: The results reflect knowledge gained through extensive experience in implementing the two GHL programs. Afya Bora has trained 188 multi-disciplinary fellows, and 100% of the African fellows are engaged in leadership positions in government departments and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in their countries. STAR has placed 147 participants (89 fellows and 58 interns) in more than 25 countries globally. Both programs were successful in strengthening south-south and north-south collaborations for a common goal of improving global health. Implementation of both fellowships identified room for improvement in operational procedures and financing of the programs, and highlighted knowledge and skills gaps, as well as challenges in sustainability of the training programs. CONCLUSIONS: Afya Bora and STAR have had significant impact and have contributed to changing the leadership landscape in global health. Future GHL programs should address sustainability in terms of financing, delivery modalities and domestic integration of knowledge. Ubiquity Press 2021-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8284509/ /pubmed/34307065 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/aogh.3219 Text en Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Expert Consensus Document Voss, Joachim Yasobant, Sandul Akridge, Anike Tarimo, Edith Seloilwe, Esther Hausner, David Mashalla, Yohana Gaps, Challenges, and Opportunities for Global Health Leadership Training |
title | Gaps, Challenges, and Opportunities for Global Health Leadership Training |
title_full | Gaps, Challenges, and Opportunities for Global Health Leadership Training |
title_fullStr | Gaps, Challenges, and Opportunities for Global Health Leadership Training |
title_full_unstemmed | Gaps, Challenges, and Opportunities for Global Health Leadership Training |
title_short | Gaps, Challenges, and Opportunities for Global Health Leadership Training |
title_sort | gaps, challenges, and opportunities for global health leadership training |
topic | Expert Consensus Document |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8284509/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34307065 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/aogh.3219 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vossjoachim gapschallengesandopportunitiesforglobalhealthleadershiptraining AT yasobantsandul gapschallengesandopportunitiesforglobalhealthleadershiptraining AT akridgeanike gapschallengesandopportunitiesforglobalhealthleadershiptraining AT tarimoedith gapschallengesandopportunitiesforglobalhealthleadershiptraining AT seloilweesther gapschallengesandopportunitiesforglobalhealthleadershiptraining AT hausnerdavid gapschallengesandopportunitiesforglobalhealthleadershiptraining AT mashallayohana gapschallengesandopportunitiesforglobalhealthleadershiptraining |