Cargando…

Gaps, Challenges, and Opportunities for Global Health Leadership Training

BACKGROUND: Global Health Leadership (GHL) programs are essential for training emerging health care professionals to be effective leaders. Synthesizing knowledge acquired through experience implementing GHL programs can inform future recommendations for GHL. OBJECTIVE: To describe the lessons learne...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Voss, Joachim, Yasobant, Sandul, Akridge, Anike, Tarimo, Edith, Seloilwe, Esther, Hausner, David, Mashalla, Yohana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ubiquity Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8284509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34307065
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/aogh.3219
_version_ 1783723403776098304
author Voss, Joachim
Yasobant, Sandul
Akridge, Anike
Tarimo, Edith
Seloilwe, Esther
Hausner, David
Mashalla, Yohana
author_facet Voss, Joachim
Yasobant, Sandul
Akridge, Anike
Tarimo, Edith
Seloilwe, Esther
Hausner, David
Mashalla, Yohana
author_sort Voss, Joachim
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Global Health Leadership (GHL) programs are essential for training emerging health care professionals to be effective leaders. Synthesizing knowledge acquired through experience implementing GHL programs can inform future recommendations for GHL. OBJECTIVE: To describe the lessons learned, highlighting gaps, challenges and opportunities, during implementation of two GHL capacity building programs, namely the Afya Bora Consortium Fellowship in Global Health Leadership and the Sustaining Technical and Analytic Resources (STAR) fellowship and internship program for global health professionals. METHODS: A mixed methods case-comparison study was conducted, using qualitative data (expert opinion) collected from the Program Directors in order to understand the experiences of the two GHL programs. A structured response guide was used to assess the overall experience in GHL program implementation, operational challenges and reported gaps. Afya Bora and STAR have been implemented for 8 and 2.5 years respectively. Thus, the analysis reflects a snapshot of the two programs at different stages. FINDINGS: The results reflect knowledge gained through extensive experience in implementing the two GHL programs. Afya Bora has trained 188 multi-disciplinary fellows, and 100% of the African fellows are engaged in leadership positions in government departments and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in their countries. STAR has placed 147 participants (89 fellows and 58 interns) in more than 25 countries globally. Both programs were successful in strengthening south-south and north-south collaborations for a common goal of improving global health. Implementation of both fellowships identified room for improvement in operational procedures and financing of the programs, and highlighted knowledge and skills gaps, as well as challenges in sustainability of the training programs. CONCLUSIONS: Afya Bora and STAR have had significant impact and have contributed to changing the leadership landscape in global health. Future GHL programs should address sustainability in terms of financing, delivery modalities and domestic integration of knowledge.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8284509
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Ubiquity Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82845092021-07-23 Gaps, Challenges, and Opportunities for Global Health Leadership Training Voss, Joachim Yasobant, Sandul Akridge, Anike Tarimo, Edith Seloilwe, Esther Hausner, David Mashalla, Yohana Ann Glob Health Expert Consensus Document BACKGROUND: Global Health Leadership (GHL) programs are essential for training emerging health care professionals to be effective leaders. Synthesizing knowledge acquired through experience implementing GHL programs can inform future recommendations for GHL. OBJECTIVE: To describe the lessons learned, highlighting gaps, challenges and opportunities, during implementation of two GHL capacity building programs, namely the Afya Bora Consortium Fellowship in Global Health Leadership and the Sustaining Technical and Analytic Resources (STAR) fellowship and internship program for global health professionals. METHODS: A mixed methods case-comparison study was conducted, using qualitative data (expert opinion) collected from the Program Directors in order to understand the experiences of the two GHL programs. A structured response guide was used to assess the overall experience in GHL program implementation, operational challenges and reported gaps. Afya Bora and STAR have been implemented for 8 and 2.5 years respectively. Thus, the analysis reflects a snapshot of the two programs at different stages. FINDINGS: The results reflect knowledge gained through extensive experience in implementing the two GHL programs. Afya Bora has trained 188 multi-disciplinary fellows, and 100% of the African fellows are engaged in leadership positions in government departments and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in their countries. STAR has placed 147 participants (89 fellows and 58 interns) in more than 25 countries globally. Both programs were successful in strengthening south-south and north-south collaborations for a common goal of improving global health. Implementation of both fellowships identified room for improvement in operational procedures and financing of the programs, and highlighted knowledge and skills gaps, as well as challenges in sustainability of the training programs. CONCLUSIONS: Afya Bora and STAR have had significant impact and have contributed to changing the leadership landscape in global health. Future GHL programs should address sustainability in terms of financing, delivery modalities and domestic integration of knowledge. Ubiquity Press 2021-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8284509/ /pubmed/34307065 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/aogh.3219 Text en Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Expert Consensus Document
Voss, Joachim
Yasobant, Sandul
Akridge, Anike
Tarimo, Edith
Seloilwe, Esther
Hausner, David
Mashalla, Yohana
Gaps, Challenges, and Opportunities for Global Health Leadership Training
title Gaps, Challenges, and Opportunities for Global Health Leadership Training
title_full Gaps, Challenges, and Opportunities for Global Health Leadership Training
title_fullStr Gaps, Challenges, and Opportunities for Global Health Leadership Training
title_full_unstemmed Gaps, Challenges, and Opportunities for Global Health Leadership Training
title_short Gaps, Challenges, and Opportunities for Global Health Leadership Training
title_sort gaps, challenges, and opportunities for global health leadership training
topic Expert Consensus Document
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8284509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34307065
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/aogh.3219
work_keys_str_mv AT vossjoachim gapschallengesandopportunitiesforglobalhealthleadershiptraining
AT yasobantsandul gapschallengesandopportunitiesforglobalhealthleadershiptraining
AT akridgeanike gapschallengesandopportunitiesforglobalhealthleadershiptraining
AT tarimoedith gapschallengesandopportunitiesforglobalhealthleadershiptraining
AT seloilweesther gapschallengesandopportunitiesforglobalhealthleadershiptraining
AT hausnerdavid gapschallengesandopportunitiesforglobalhealthleadershiptraining
AT mashallayohana gapschallengesandopportunitiesforglobalhealthleadershiptraining