Cargando…

Protein folding ‐ seeing is deceiving

This Perspective is intended to raise questions about the conventional interpretation of protein folding. According to the conventional interpretation, developed over many decades, a protein population can visit a vast number of conformations under unfolding conditions, but a single dominant native...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Rose, George D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8284583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33938055
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pro.4096
_version_ 1783723416282464256
author Rose, George D.
author_facet Rose, George D.
author_sort Rose, George D.
collection PubMed
description This Perspective is intended to raise questions about the conventional interpretation of protein folding. According to the conventional interpretation, developed over many decades, a protein population can visit a vast number of conformations under unfolding conditions, but a single dominant native population emerges under folding conditions. Accordingly, folding comes with a substantial loss of conformational entropy. How is this price paid? The conventional answer is that favorable interactions between and among the side chains can compensate for entropy loss, and moreover, these interactions are responsible for the structural particulars of the native conformation. Challenging this interpretation, the Perspective introduces a proposal that high energy (i.e., unfavorable) excluding interactions winnow the accessible population substantially under physical–chemical conditions that favor folding. Both steric clash and unsatisfied hydrogen bond donors and acceptors are classified as excluding interactions, so called because conformers with such disfavored interactions will be largely excluded from the thermodynamic population. Both excluding interactions and solvent factors that induce compactness are somewhat nonspecific, yet together they promote substantial chain organization. Moreover, proteins are built on a backbone scaffold consisting of α‐helices and strands of β‐sheet, where the number of hydrogen bond donors and acceptors is exactly balanced. These repetitive secondary structural elements are the only two conformers that can be both completely hydrogen‐bond satisfied and extended indefinitely without encountering a steric clash. Consequently, the number of fundamental folds is limited to no more than ~10,000 for a protein domain. Once excluding interactions are taken into account, the issue of “frustration” is largely eliminated and the Levinthal paradox is resolved. Putting the “bottom line” at the top: it is likely that hydrogen‐bond satisfaction represents a largely under‐appreciated parameter in protein folding models.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8284583
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82845832021-07-21 Protein folding ‐ seeing is deceiving Rose, George D. Protein Sci Full‐Length Papers This Perspective is intended to raise questions about the conventional interpretation of protein folding. According to the conventional interpretation, developed over many decades, a protein population can visit a vast number of conformations under unfolding conditions, but a single dominant native population emerges under folding conditions. Accordingly, folding comes with a substantial loss of conformational entropy. How is this price paid? The conventional answer is that favorable interactions between and among the side chains can compensate for entropy loss, and moreover, these interactions are responsible for the structural particulars of the native conformation. Challenging this interpretation, the Perspective introduces a proposal that high energy (i.e., unfavorable) excluding interactions winnow the accessible population substantially under physical–chemical conditions that favor folding. Both steric clash and unsatisfied hydrogen bond donors and acceptors are classified as excluding interactions, so called because conformers with such disfavored interactions will be largely excluded from the thermodynamic population. Both excluding interactions and solvent factors that induce compactness are somewhat nonspecific, yet together they promote substantial chain organization. Moreover, proteins are built on a backbone scaffold consisting of α‐helices and strands of β‐sheet, where the number of hydrogen bond donors and acceptors is exactly balanced. These repetitive secondary structural elements are the only two conformers that can be both completely hydrogen‐bond satisfied and extended indefinitely without encountering a steric clash. Consequently, the number of fundamental folds is limited to no more than ~10,000 for a protein domain. Once excluding interactions are taken into account, the issue of “frustration” is largely eliminated and the Levinthal paradox is resolved. Putting the “bottom line” at the top: it is likely that hydrogen‐bond satisfaction represents a largely under‐appreciated parameter in protein folding models. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021-05-07 2021-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8284583/ /pubmed/33938055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pro.4096 Text en © 2021 The Author. Protein Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Protein Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Full‐Length Papers
Rose, George D.
Protein folding ‐ seeing is deceiving
title Protein folding ‐ seeing is deceiving
title_full Protein folding ‐ seeing is deceiving
title_fullStr Protein folding ‐ seeing is deceiving
title_full_unstemmed Protein folding ‐ seeing is deceiving
title_short Protein folding ‐ seeing is deceiving
title_sort protein folding ‐ seeing is deceiving
topic Full‐Length Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8284583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33938055
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pro.4096
work_keys_str_mv AT rosegeorged proteinfoldingseeingisdeceiving