Cargando…

Radiological assessment schedule for 1p/19q-codeleted gliomas during the surveillance period using parametric modeling

BACKGROUND: There have been no evidence-based guidelines on the optimal schedule for the radiological assessment of 1p/19q-codeleted glioma. This study aimed to recommend an appropriate radiological evaluation schedule for 1p/19q-codeleted glioma during the surveillance period through parametric mod...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kang, Ho, Lee, Jongjin, Ji, So Young, Choi, Seung Won, Kim, Kyung-Min, Lee, Joo Ho, Lee, Soon-Tae, Won, Jae Kyung, Kim, Tae Min, Choi, Seung Hong, Park, Sung-Hye, Moon, Kyung-Sub, Kim, Chae-Yong, Yoo, Heon, Nam, Do-Hyun, Kim, Jeong Hoon, Kim, Yongdai, Park, Chul-Kee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8284622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34286277
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdab069
_version_ 1783723421983571968
author Kang, Ho
Lee, Jongjin
Ji, So Young
Choi, Seung Won
Kim, Kyung-Min
Lee, Joo Ho
Lee, Soon-Tae
Won, Jae Kyung
Kim, Tae Min
Choi, Seung Hong
Park, Sung-Hye
Moon, Kyung-Sub
Kim, Chae-Yong
Yoo, Heon
Nam, Do-Hyun
Kim, Jeong Hoon
Kim, Yongdai
Park, Chul-Kee
author_facet Kang, Ho
Lee, Jongjin
Ji, So Young
Choi, Seung Won
Kim, Kyung-Min
Lee, Joo Ho
Lee, Soon-Tae
Won, Jae Kyung
Kim, Tae Min
Choi, Seung Hong
Park, Sung-Hye
Moon, Kyung-Sub
Kim, Chae-Yong
Yoo, Heon
Nam, Do-Hyun
Kim, Jeong Hoon
Kim, Yongdai
Park, Chul-Kee
author_sort Kang, Ho
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There have been no evidence-based guidelines on the optimal schedule for the radiological assessment of 1p/19q-codeleted glioma. This study aimed to recommend an appropriate radiological evaluation schedule for 1p/19q-codeleted glioma during the surveillance period through parametric modeling of the progression-free survival (PFS) curve. METHODS: A total of 234 patients with 1p/19q-codeleted glioma (137 grade II and 97 grade III) who completed regular treatment were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were stratified into each layered progression risk group by recursive partitioning analysis. A piecewise exponential model was used to standardize the PFS curves. The cutoff value of the progression rate among the remaining progression-free patients was set to 10% at each scan. RESULTS: Progression risk stratification resulted in 3 groups. The optimal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) interval for patients without a residual tumor was every 91.2 weeks until 720 weeks after the end of regular treatment following the latent period for 15 weeks. For patients with a residual tumor after the completion of adjuvant radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy, the optimal MRI interval was every 37.5 weeks until week 90 and every 132.8 weeks until week 361, while it was every 33.6 weeks until week 210 and every 14.4 weeks until week 495 for patients with a residual tumor after surgery only or surgery followed by radiotherapy only. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal radiological follow-up schedule for each progression risk stratification of 1p/19q-codeleted glioma can be established from the parametric modeling of PFS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8284622
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82846222021-07-19 Radiological assessment schedule for 1p/19q-codeleted gliomas during the surveillance period using parametric modeling Kang, Ho Lee, Jongjin Ji, So Young Choi, Seung Won Kim, Kyung-Min Lee, Joo Ho Lee, Soon-Tae Won, Jae Kyung Kim, Tae Min Choi, Seung Hong Park, Sung-Hye Moon, Kyung-Sub Kim, Chae-Yong Yoo, Heon Nam, Do-Hyun Kim, Jeong Hoon Kim, Yongdai Park, Chul-Kee Neurooncol Adv Clinical Investigations BACKGROUND: There have been no evidence-based guidelines on the optimal schedule for the radiological assessment of 1p/19q-codeleted glioma. This study aimed to recommend an appropriate radiological evaluation schedule for 1p/19q-codeleted glioma during the surveillance period through parametric modeling of the progression-free survival (PFS) curve. METHODS: A total of 234 patients with 1p/19q-codeleted glioma (137 grade II and 97 grade III) who completed regular treatment were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were stratified into each layered progression risk group by recursive partitioning analysis. A piecewise exponential model was used to standardize the PFS curves. The cutoff value of the progression rate among the remaining progression-free patients was set to 10% at each scan. RESULTS: Progression risk stratification resulted in 3 groups. The optimal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) interval for patients without a residual tumor was every 91.2 weeks until 720 weeks after the end of regular treatment following the latent period for 15 weeks. For patients with a residual tumor after the completion of adjuvant radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy, the optimal MRI interval was every 37.5 weeks until week 90 and every 132.8 weeks until week 361, while it was every 33.6 weeks until week 210 and every 14.4 weeks until week 495 for patients with a residual tumor after surgery only or surgery followed by radiotherapy only. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal radiological follow-up schedule for each progression risk stratification of 1p/19q-codeleted glioma can be established from the parametric modeling of PFS. Oxford University Press 2021-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8284622/ /pubmed/34286277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdab069 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press, the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Clinical Investigations
Kang, Ho
Lee, Jongjin
Ji, So Young
Choi, Seung Won
Kim, Kyung-Min
Lee, Joo Ho
Lee, Soon-Tae
Won, Jae Kyung
Kim, Tae Min
Choi, Seung Hong
Park, Sung-Hye
Moon, Kyung-Sub
Kim, Chae-Yong
Yoo, Heon
Nam, Do-Hyun
Kim, Jeong Hoon
Kim, Yongdai
Park, Chul-Kee
Radiological assessment schedule for 1p/19q-codeleted gliomas during the surveillance period using parametric modeling
title Radiological assessment schedule for 1p/19q-codeleted gliomas during the surveillance period using parametric modeling
title_full Radiological assessment schedule for 1p/19q-codeleted gliomas during the surveillance period using parametric modeling
title_fullStr Radiological assessment schedule for 1p/19q-codeleted gliomas during the surveillance period using parametric modeling
title_full_unstemmed Radiological assessment schedule for 1p/19q-codeleted gliomas during the surveillance period using parametric modeling
title_short Radiological assessment schedule for 1p/19q-codeleted gliomas during the surveillance period using parametric modeling
title_sort radiological assessment schedule for 1p/19q-codeleted gliomas during the surveillance period using parametric modeling
topic Clinical Investigations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8284622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34286277
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdab069
work_keys_str_mv AT kangho radiologicalassessmentschedulefor1p19qcodeletedgliomasduringthesurveillanceperiodusingparametricmodeling
AT leejongjin radiologicalassessmentschedulefor1p19qcodeletedgliomasduringthesurveillanceperiodusingparametricmodeling
AT jisoyoung radiologicalassessmentschedulefor1p19qcodeletedgliomasduringthesurveillanceperiodusingparametricmodeling
AT choiseungwon radiologicalassessmentschedulefor1p19qcodeletedgliomasduringthesurveillanceperiodusingparametricmodeling
AT kimkyungmin radiologicalassessmentschedulefor1p19qcodeletedgliomasduringthesurveillanceperiodusingparametricmodeling
AT leejooho radiologicalassessmentschedulefor1p19qcodeletedgliomasduringthesurveillanceperiodusingparametricmodeling
AT leesoontae radiologicalassessmentschedulefor1p19qcodeletedgliomasduringthesurveillanceperiodusingparametricmodeling
AT wonjaekyung radiologicalassessmentschedulefor1p19qcodeletedgliomasduringthesurveillanceperiodusingparametricmodeling
AT kimtaemin radiologicalassessmentschedulefor1p19qcodeletedgliomasduringthesurveillanceperiodusingparametricmodeling
AT choiseunghong radiologicalassessmentschedulefor1p19qcodeletedgliomasduringthesurveillanceperiodusingparametricmodeling
AT parksunghye radiologicalassessmentschedulefor1p19qcodeletedgliomasduringthesurveillanceperiodusingparametricmodeling
AT moonkyungsub radiologicalassessmentschedulefor1p19qcodeletedgliomasduringthesurveillanceperiodusingparametricmodeling
AT kimchaeyong radiologicalassessmentschedulefor1p19qcodeletedgliomasduringthesurveillanceperiodusingparametricmodeling
AT yooheon radiologicalassessmentschedulefor1p19qcodeletedgliomasduringthesurveillanceperiodusingparametricmodeling
AT namdohyun radiologicalassessmentschedulefor1p19qcodeletedgliomasduringthesurveillanceperiodusingparametricmodeling
AT kimjeonghoon radiologicalassessmentschedulefor1p19qcodeletedgliomasduringthesurveillanceperiodusingparametricmodeling
AT kimyongdai radiologicalassessmentschedulefor1p19qcodeletedgliomasduringthesurveillanceperiodusingparametricmodeling
AT parkchulkee radiologicalassessmentschedulefor1p19qcodeletedgliomasduringthesurveillanceperiodusingparametricmodeling