Cargando…

Belowground productivity varies by assessment technique, vegetation type, and nutrient availability in tidal freshwater forested wetlands transitioning to marsh

Wetlands along upper estuaries are characterized by dynamic transitions between forested and herbaceous communities (marsh) as salinity, hydroperiod, and nutrients change. The importance of belowground net primary productivity (BNPP) associated with fine and coarse root growth also changes but remai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: From, Andrew S., Krauss, Ken W., Noe, Gregory B., Cormier, Nicole, Stagg, Camille L., Moss, Rebecca F., Whitbeck, Julie L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8284669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34270570
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253554
_version_ 1783723433113157632
author From, Andrew S.
Krauss, Ken W.
Noe, Gregory B.
Cormier, Nicole
Stagg, Camille L.
Moss, Rebecca F.
Whitbeck, Julie L.
author_facet From, Andrew S.
Krauss, Ken W.
Noe, Gregory B.
Cormier, Nicole
Stagg, Camille L.
Moss, Rebecca F.
Whitbeck, Julie L.
author_sort From, Andrew S.
collection PubMed
description Wetlands along upper estuaries are characterized by dynamic transitions between forested and herbaceous communities (marsh) as salinity, hydroperiod, and nutrients change. The importance of belowground net primary productivity (BNPP) associated with fine and coarse root growth also changes but remains the dominant component of overall productivity in these important blue carbon wetlands. Appropriate BNPP assessment techniques to use in various tidal wetlands are not well-defined, and could make a difference in BNPP estimation. We hypothesized that different BNPP techniques applied among tidal wetlands differ in estimation of BNPP and possibly also correlate differently with porewater nutrient concentrations. We compare 6-month and 12-month root ingrowth, serial soil coring techniques utilizing two different calculations, and a mass balance approach (TBCA, Total Belowground Carbon Allocation) among four tidal wetland types along each of two river systems transitioning from freshwater forest to marsh. Median values of BNPP were 266 to 2946 g/m(2)/year among all techniques used, with lower BNPP estimation from root ingrowth cores and TBCA (266–416 g/m(2)/year), and higher BNPP estimation from serial coring of standing crop root biomass (using Smalley and Max-Min calculation methods) (2336–2946 g/m(2)/year). Root turnover (or longevity) to a soil depth of 30 cm was 2.2/year (1.3 years), 2.7/year (1.1 years), 4.5/year (0.9 years), and 1.2/year (2.6 years), respectively, for Upper Forest, Middle Forest, Lower Forest, and Marsh. Marsh had greater root biomass and BNPP, with slower root turnover (greater root longevity) versus forested wetlands. Soil porewater concentrations of NH(3) and reactive phosphorus stimulated BNPP in the marsh when assessed with short-deployment BNPP techniques, indicating that pulses of mineralized nutrients may stimulate BNPP to facilitate marsh replacement of forested wetlands. Overall, ingrowth techniques appeared to represent forested wetland BNPP adequately, while serial coring may be necessary to represent herbaceous plant BNPP from rhizomes as marshes replace forested wetlands.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8284669
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82846692021-07-28 Belowground productivity varies by assessment technique, vegetation type, and nutrient availability in tidal freshwater forested wetlands transitioning to marsh From, Andrew S. Krauss, Ken W. Noe, Gregory B. Cormier, Nicole Stagg, Camille L. Moss, Rebecca F. Whitbeck, Julie L. PLoS One Research Article Wetlands along upper estuaries are characterized by dynamic transitions between forested and herbaceous communities (marsh) as salinity, hydroperiod, and nutrients change. The importance of belowground net primary productivity (BNPP) associated with fine and coarse root growth also changes but remains the dominant component of overall productivity in these important blue carbon wetlands. Appropriate BNPP assessment techniques to use in various tidal wetlands are not well-defined, and could make a difference in BNPP estimation. We hypothesized that different BNPP techniques applied among tidal wetlands differ in estimation of BNPP and possibly also correlate differently with porewater nutrient concentrations. We compare 6-month and 12-month root ingrowth, serial soil coring techniques utilizing two different calculations, and a mass balance approach (TBCA, Total Belowground Carbon Allocation) among four tidal wetland types along each of two river systems transitioning from freshwater forest to marsh. Median values of BNPP were 266 to 2946 g/m(2)/year among all techniques used, with lower BNPP estimation from root ingrowth cores and TBCA (266–416 g/m(2)/year), and higher BNPP estimation from serial coring of standing crop root biomass (using Smalley and Max-Min calculation methods) (2336–2946 g/m(2)/year). Root turnover (or longevity) to a soil depth of 30 cm was 2.2/year (1.3 years), 2.7/year (1.1 years), 4.5/year (0.9 years), and 1.2/year (2.6 years), respectively, for Upper Forest, Middle Forest, Lower Forest, and Marsh. Marsh had greater root biomass and BNPP, with slower root turnover (greater root longevity) versus forested wetlands. Soil porewater concentrations of NH(3) and reactive phosphorus stimulated BNPP in the marsh when assessed with short-deployment BNPP techniques, indicating that pulses of mineralized nutrients may stimulate BNPP to facilitate marsh replacement of forested wetlands. Overall, ingrowth techniques appeared to represent forested wetland BNPP adequately, while serial coring may be necessary to represent herbaceous plant BNPP from rhizomes as marshes replace forested wetlands. Public Library of Science 2021-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8284669/ /pubmed/34270570 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253554 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication.
spellingShingle Research Article
From, Andrew S.
Krauss, Ken W.
Noe, Gregory B.
Cormier, Nicole
Stagg, Camille L.
Moss, Rebecca F.
Whitbeck, Julie L.
Belowground productivity varies by assessment technique, vegetation type, and nutrient availability in tidal freshwater forested wetlands transitioning to marsh
title Belowground productivity varies by assessment technique, vegetation type, and nutrient availability in tidal freshwater forested wetlands transitioning to marsh
title_full Belowground productivity varies by assessment technique, vegetation type, and nutrient availability in tidal freshwater forested wetlands transitioning to marsh
title_fullStr Belowground productivity varies by assessment technique, vegetation type, and nutrient availability in tidal freshwater forested wetlands transitioning to marsh
title_full_unstemmed Belowground productivity varies by assessment technique, vegetation type, and nutrient availability in tidal freshwater forested wetlands transitioning to marsh
title_short Belowground productivity varies by assessment technique, vegetation type, and nutrient availability in tidal freshwater forested wetlands transitioning to marsh
title_sort belowground productivity varies by assessment technique, vegetation type, and nutrient availability in tidal freshwater forested wetlands transitioning to marsh
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8284669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34270570
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253554
work_keys_str_mv AT fromandrews belowgroundproductivityvariesbyassessmenttechniquevegetationtypeandnutrientavailabilityintidalfreshwaterforestedwetlandstransitioningtomarsh
AT krausskenw belowgroundproductivityvariesbyassessmenttechniquevegetationtypeandnutrientavailabilityintidalfreshwaterforestedwetlandstransitioningtomarsh
AT noegregoryb belowgroundproductivityvariesbyassessmenttechniquevegetationtypeandnutrientavailabilityintidalfreshwaterforestedwetlandstransitioningtomarsh
AT cormiernicole belowgroundproductivityvariesbyassessmenttechniquevegetationtypeandnutrientavailabilityintidalfreshwaterforestedwetlandstransitioningtomarsh
AT staggcamillel belowgroundproductivityvariesbyassessmenttechniquevegetationtypeandnutrientavailabilityintidalfreshwaterforestedwetlandstransitioningtomarsh
AT mossrebeccaf belowgroundproductivityvariesbyassessmenttechniquevegetationtypeandnutrientavailabilityintidalfreshwaterforestedwetlandstransitioningtomarsh
AT whitbeckjuliel belowgroundproductivityvariesbyassessmenttechniquevegetationtypeandnutrientavailabilityintidalfreshwaterforestedwetlandstransitioningtomarsh