Cargando…

Comparison of 2940 nm Er: YAG laser treatment in the microlaser peel, fractional ablative laser, or combined modes for the treatment of concave acne scars

OBJECTIVE: To compare and analyze the effects of Er:YAG laser treatment in the microlaser peeling, fractional ablative laser, or combined modes for the treatment of concave acne scars. METHOD: Ninety patients of concavity acne scar were randomly assigned to three different groups:microlaserpeeling m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Lei, Wang, Yanjin, Jiang, Lili, Fang, Jing, Ren, Jizhen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8284722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34260562
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000026642
_version_ 1783723445510471680
author Chen, Lei
Wang, Yanjin
Jiang, Lili
Fang, Jing
Ren, Jizhen
author_facet Chen, Lei
Wang, Yanjin
Jiang, Lili
Fang, Jing
Ren, Jizhen
author_sort Chen, Lei
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare and analyze the effects of Er:YAG laser treatment in the microlaser peeling, fractional ablative laser, or combined modes for the treatment of concave acne scars. METHOD: Ninety patients of concavity acne scar were randomly assigned to three different groups:microlaserpeeling mode group (MM group), fractional ablative mode group (FM group) and combined mode group (CM group). MM group received microlaserpeeling mode with depth of 60 μm and a repetition rate of 20%, FM group received fractional ablative mode with depth of 300 μm and a fractional density of 8%, and CM group received a fractional depth of 200 μm, density of 8%, and a peeling depth of 30 μm, repetition rate of 20%. All patients were evaluated for their treatment effects and side effects 30 days after treatment, including the treatment satisfaction, the ECCA grading scale, pain score and pigmentation level. RESULTS: According to the effect satisfaction of patients’ self-assessment, the difference among the three groups was statistically significant (P < .05), the CM group was better than the other two groups, but there was no significant difference between the FM group and the MM group (P > .05). About the ECCA grading scale 30 days after treatment, the statistical result among the three groups was significant (P < .05), the CM group is much lower than the FM group which is approximately equal to the MM group. There was statistical difference in pain score among the three groups and every two groups (P < .05), the CM group had the highest pain score, while FM group had the lowest. About the pigmentation level, there was statistical difference among the three groups (P < .05), FM group had the lightest pigmentation, while the CM group had the heaviest. CONCLUSIONS: Three treatment modes are all effective in treating the concavity acne scar. Among the three modes, CM group is best effective, also accompanied with the most severe side effect; FM group achieves the best balance between treatment effect and side effect. The treatment practices indicate that when the Er:YAG laser with a wavelength of 2940 nm is used to treat concavity acne scars, the right treatment mode should be subject to the severity of the scar.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8284722
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82847222021-07-19 Comparison of 2940 nm Er: YAG laser treatment in the microlaser peel, fractional ablative laser, or combined modes for the treatment of concave acne scars Chen, Lei Wang, Yanjin Jiang, Lili Fang, Jing Ren, Jizhen Medicine (Baltimore) 7100 OBJECTIVE: To compare and analyze the effects of Er:YAG laser treatment in the microlaser peeling, fractional ablative laser, or combined modes for the treatment of concave acne scars. METHOD: Ninety patients of concavity acne scar were randomly assigned to three different groups:microlaserpeeling mode group (MM group), fractional ablative mode group (FM group) and combined mode group (CM group). MM group received microlaserpeeling mode with depth of 60 μm and a repetition rate of 20%, FM group received fractional ablative mode with depth of 300 μm and a fractional density of 8%, and CM group received a fractional depth of 200 μm, density of 8%, and a peeling depth of 30 μm, repetition rate of 20%. All patients were evaluated for their treatment effects and side effects 30 days after treatment, including the treatment satisfaction, the ECCA grading scale, pain score and pigmentation level. RESULTS: According to the effect satisfaction of patients’ self-assessment, the difference among the three groups was statistically significant (P < .05), the CM group was better than the other two groups, but there was no significant difference between the FM group and the MM group (P > .05). About the ECCA grading scale 30 days after treatment, the statistical result among the three groups was significant (P < .05), the CM group is much lower than the FM group which is approximately equal to the MM group. There was statistical difference in pain score among the three groups and every two groups (P < .05), the CM group had the highest pain score, while FM group had the lowest. About the pigmentation level, there was statistical difference among the three groups (P < .05), FM group had the lightest pigmentation, while the CM group had the heaviest. CONCLUSIONS: Three treatment modes are all effective in treating the concavity acne scar. Among the three modes, CM group is best effective, also accompanied with the most severe side effect; FM group achieves the best balance between treatment effect and side effect. The treatment practices indicate that when the Er:YAG laser with a wavelength of 2940 nm is used to treat concavity acne scars, the right treatment mode should be subject to the severity of the scar. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8284722/ /pubmed/34260562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000026642 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle 7100
Chen, Lei
Wang, Yanjin
Jiang, Lili
Fang, Jing
Ren, Jizhen
Comparison of 2940 nm Er: YAG laser treatment in the microlaser peel, fractional ablative laser, or combined modes for the treatment of concave acne scars
title Comparison of 2940 nm Er: YAG laser treatment in the microlaser peel, fractional ablative laser, or combined modes for the treatment of concave acne scars
title_full Comparison of 2940 nm Er: YAG laser treatment in the microlaser peel, fractional ablative laser, or combined modes for the treatment of concave acne scars
title_fullStr Comparison of 2940 nm Er: YAG laser treatment in the microlaser peel, fractional ablative laser, or combined modes for the treatment of concave acne scars
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of 2940 nm Er: YAG laser treatment in the microlaser peel, fractional ablative laser, or combined modes for the treatment of concave acne scars
title_short Comparison of 2940 nm Er: YAG laser treatment in the microlaser peel, fractional ablative laser, or combined modes for the treatment of concave acne scars
title_sort comparison of 2940 nm er: yag laser treatment in the microlaser peel, fractional ablative laser, or combined modes for the treatment of concave acne scars
topic 7100
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8284722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34260562
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000026642
work_keys_str_mv AT chenlei comparisonof2940nmeryaglasertreatmentinthemicrolaserpeelfractionalablativelaserorcombinedmodesforthetreatmentofconcaveacnescars
AT wangyanjin comparisonof2940nmeryaglasertreatmentinthemicrolaserpeelfractionalablativelaserorcombinedmodesforthetreatmentofconcaveacnescars
AT jianglili comparisonof2940nmeryaglasertreatmentinthemicrolaserpeelfractionalablativelaserorcombinedmodesforthetreatmentofconcaveacnescars
AT fangjing comparisonof2940nmeryaglasertreatmentinthemicrolaserpeelfractionalablativelaserorcombinedmodesforthetreatmentofconcaveacnescars
AT renjizhen comparisonof2940nmeryaglasertreatmentinthemicrolaserpeelfractionalablativelaserorcombinedmodesforthetreatmentofconcaveacnescars