Cargando…
Models of provider care in long-term care: A rapid scoping review
INTRODUCTION: One of the current challenges in long-term care homes (LTCH) is to identify the optimal model of care, which may include specialty physicians, nursing staff, person support workers, among others. There is currently no consensus on the complement or scope of care delivered by these prov...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8284811/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34270578 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254527 |
_version_ | 1783723464523251712 |
---|---|
author | Hamel, Candyce Garritty, Chantelle Hersi, Mona Butler, Claire Esmaeilisaraji, Leila Rice, Danielle Straus, Sharon Skidmore, Becky Hutton, Brian |
author_facet | Hamel, Candyce Garritty, Chantelle Hersi, Mona Butler, Claire Esmaeilisaraji, Leila Rice, Danielle Straus, Sharon Skidmore, Becky Hutton, Brian |
author_sort | Hamel, Candyce |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: One of the current challenges in long-term care homes (LTCH) is to identify the optimal model of care, which may include specialty physicians, nursing staff, person support workers, among others. There is currently no consensus on the complement or scope of care delivered by these providers, nor is there a repository of studies that evaluate the various models of care. We conducted a rapid scoping review to identify and map what care provider models and interventions in LTCH have been evaluated to improve quality of life, quality of care, and health outcomes of residents. METHODS: We conducted this review over 10-weeks of English language, peer-reviewed studies published from 2010 onward. Search strategies for databases (e.g., MEDLINE) were run on July 9, 2020. Studies that evaluated models of provider care (e.g., direct patient care), or interventions delivered to facility, staff, and residents of LTCH were included. Study selection was performed independently, in duplicate. Mapping was performed by two reviewers, and data were extracted by one reviewer, with partial verification by a second reviewer. RESULTS: A total of 7,574 citations were screened based on the title/abstract, 836 were reviewed at full text, and 366 studies were included. Studies were classified according to two main categories: healthcare service delivery (n = 92) and implementation strategies (n = 274). The condition/ focus of the intervention was used to further classify the interventions into subcategories. The complex nature of the interventions may have led to a study being classified in more than one category/subcategory. CONCLUSION: Many healthcare service interventions have been evaluated in the literature in the last decade. Well represented interventions (e.g., dementia care, exercise/mobility, optimal/appropriate medication) may present opportunities for future systematic reviews. Areas with less research (e.g., hearing care, vision care, foot care) have the potential to have an impact on balance, falls, subsequent acute care hospitalization. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8284811 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82848112021-07-28 Models of provider care in long-term care: A rapid scoping review Hamel, Candyce Garritty, Chantelle Hersi, Mona Butler, Claire Esmaeilisaraji, Leila Rice, Danielle Straus, Sharon Skidmore, Becky Hutton, Brian PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: One of the current challenges in long-term care homes (LTCH) is to identify the optimal model of care, which may include specialty physicians, nursing staff, person support workers, among others. There is currently no consensus on the complement or scope of care delivered by these providers, nor is there a repository of studies that evaluate the various models of care. We conducted a rapid scoping review to identify and map what care provider models and interventions in LTCH have been evaluated to improve quality of life, quality of care, and health outcomes of residents. METHODS: We conducted this review over 10-weeks of English language, peer-reviewed studies published from 2010 onward. Search strategies for databases (e.g., MEDLINE) were run on July 9, 2020. Studies that evaluated models of provider care (e.g., direct patient care), or interventions delivered to facility, staff, and residents of LTCH were included. Study selection was performed independently, in duplicate. Mapping was performed by two reviewers, and data were extracted by one reviewer, with partial verification by a second reviewer. RESULTS: A total of 7,574 citations were screened based on the title/abstract, 836 were reviewed at full text, and 366 studies were included. Studies were classified according to two main categories: healthcare service delivery (n = 92) and implementation strategies (n = 274). The condition/ focus of the intervention was used to further classify the interventions into subcategories. The complex nature of the interventions may have led to a study being classified in more than one category/subcategory. CONCLUSION: Many healthcare service interventions have been evaluated in the literature in the last decade. Well represented interventions (e.g., dementia care, exercise/mobility, optimal/appropriate medication) may present opportunities for future systematic reviews. Areas with less research (e.g., hearing care, vision care, foot care) have the potential to have an impact on balance, falls, subsequent acute care hospitalization. Public Library of Science 2021-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8284811/ /pubmed/34270578 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254527 Text en © 2021 Hamel et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hamel, Candyce Garritty, Chantelle Hersi, Mona Butler, Claire Esmaeilisaraji, Leila Rice, Danielle Straus, Sharon Skidmore, Becky Hutton, Brian Models of provider care in long-term care: A rapid scoping review |
title | Models of provider care in long-term care: A rapid scoping review |
title_full | Models of provider care in long-term care: A rapid scoping review |
title_fullStr | Models of provider care in long-term care: A rapid scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Models of provider care in long-term care: A rapid scoping review |
title_short | Models of provider care in long-term care: A rapid scoping review |
title_sort | models of provider care in long-term care: a rapid scoping review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8284811/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34270578 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254527 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hamelcandyce modelsofprovidercareinlongtermcarearapidscopingreview AT garrittychantelle modelsofprovidercareinlongtermcarearapidscopingreview AT hersimona modelsofprovidercareinlongtermcarearapidscopingreview AT butlerclaire modelsofprovidercareinlongtermcarearapidscopingreview AT esmaeilisarajileila modelsofprovidercareinlongtermcarearapidscopingreview AT ricedanielle modelsofprovidercareinlongtermcarearapidscopingreview AT straussharon modelsofprovidercareinlongtermcarearapidscopingreview AT skidmorebecky modelsofprovidercareinlongtermcarearapidscopingreview AT huttonbrian modelsofprovidercareinlongtermcarearapidscopingreview |