Cargando…
Letermovir prophylaxis is effective in preventing cytomegalovirus reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: single-center real-world data
Morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) are still essentially affected by reactivation of cytomegalovirus (CMV). We evaluated 80 seropositive patients transplanted consecutively between March 2018 and March 2019 who received letermovir (LET) prophylaxis...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8285358/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33270162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00277-020-04362-2 |
_version_ | 1783723545409355776 |
---|---|
author | Derigs, Patrick Radujkovic, Aleksandar Schubert, Maria-Luisa Schnitzler, Paul Schöning, Tilman Müller-Tidow, Carsten Hegenbart, Ute Schönland, Stefan O. Luft, Thomas Dreger, Peter Schmitt, Michael |
author_facet | Derigs, Patrick Radujkovic, Aleksandar Schubert, Maria-Luisa Schnitzler, Paul Schöning, Tilman Müller-Tidow, Carsten Hegenbart, Ute Schönland, Stefan O. Luft, Thomas Dreger, Peter Schmitt, Michael |
author_sort | Derigs, Patrick |
collection | PubMed |
description | Morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) are still essentially affected by reactivation of cytomegalovirus (CMV). We evaluated 80 seropositive patients transplanted consecutively between March 2018 and March 2019 who received letermovir (LET) prophylaxis from engraftment until day +100 and retrospectively compared them with 80 patients without LET allografted between January 2017 and March 2018. The primary endpoint of this study was the cumulative incidence (CI) of clinically significant CMV infection (CS-CMVi) defined as CMV reactivation demanding preemptive treatment or CMV disease. With 14% CI of CS-CMVi at day +100 (11 events) was significantly lower in the LET cohort when compared to the control group (33 events, 41%; HR 0.29; p < 0.001). Whereas therapy with foscarnet could be completely avoided in the LET group, 7 out of 80 patients in the control cohort received foscarnet, resulting in 151 extra in-patient days for foscarnet administration (p = 0.002). One-year overall survival was 72% in the control arm vs 84% in the LET arm (HR 0.75 [95%CI 0.43–1.30]; p < 0.306). This study confirms efficacy and safety of LET for prophylaxis of CS-CMVi after alloHCT in a real-world setting, resulting in a significant patient benefit by reducing hospitalization needs and exposure to potentially toxic antiviral drugs for treatment of CMV reactivation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8285358 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82853582021-07-20 Letermovir prophylaxis is effective in preventing cytomegalovirus reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: single-center real-world data Derigs, Patrick Radujkovic, Aleksandar Schubert, Maria-Luisa Schnitzler, Paul Schöning, Tilman Müller-Tidow, Carsten Hegenbart, Ute Schönland, Stefan O. Luft, Thomas Dreger, Peter Schmitt, Michael Ann Hematol Original Article Morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) are still essentially affected by reactivation of cytomegalovirus (CMV). We evaluated 80 seropositive patients transplanted consecutively between March 2018 and March 2019 who received letermovir (LET) prophylaxis from engraftment until day +100 and retrospectively compared them with 80 patients without LET allografted between January 2017 and March 2018. The primary endpoint of this study was the cumulative incidence (CI) of clinically significant CMV infection (CS-CMVi) defined as CMV reactivation demanding preemptive treatment or CMV disease. With 14% CI of CS-CMVi at day +100 (11 events) was significantly lower in the LET cohort when compared to the control group (33 events, 41%; HR 0.29; p < 0.001). Whereas therapy with foscarnet could be completely avoided in the LET group, 7 out of 80 patients in the control cohort received foscarnet, resulting in 151 extra in-patient days for foscarnet administration (p = 0.002). One-year overall survival was 72% in the control arm vs 84% in the LET arm (HR 0.75 [95%CI 0.43–1.30]; p < 0.306). This study confirms efficacy and safety of LET for prophylaxis of CS-CMVi after alloHCT in a real-world setting, resulting in a significant patient benefit by reducing hospitalization needs and exposure to potentially toxic antiviral drugs for treatment of CMV reactivation. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-12-03 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8285358/ /pubmed/33270162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00277-020-04362-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Derigs, Patrick Radujkovic, Aleksandar Schubert, Maria-Luisa Schnitzler, Paul Schöning, Tilman Müller-Tidow, Carsten Hegenbart, Ute Schönland, Stefan O. Luft, Thomas Dreger, Peter Schmitt, Michael Letermovir prophylaxis is effective in preventing cytomegalovirus reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: single-center real-world data |
title | Letermovir prophylaxis is effective in preventing cytomegalovirus reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: single-center real-world data |
title_full | Letermovir prophylaxis is effective in preventing cytomegalovirus reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: single-center real-world data |
title_fullStr | Letermovir prophylaxis is effective in preventing cytomegalovirus reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: single-center real-world data |
title_full_unstemmed | Letermovir prophylaxis is effective in preventing cytomegalovirus reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: single-center real-world data |
title_short | Letermovir prophylaxis is effective in preventing cytomegalovirus reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: single-center real-world data |
title_sort | letermovir prophylaxis is effective in preventing cytomegalovirus reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: single-center real-world data |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8285358/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33270162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00277-020-04362-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT derigspatrick letermovirprophylaxisiseffectiveinpreventingcytomegalovirusreactivationafterallogeneichematopoieticcelltransplantationsinglecenterrealworlddata AT radujkovicaleksandar letermovirprophylaxisiseffectiveinpreventingcytomegalovirusreactivationafterallogeneichematopoieticcelltransplantationsinglecenterrealworlddata AT schubertmarialuisa letermovirprophylaxisiseffectiveinpreventingcytomegalovirusreactivationafterallogeneichematopoieticcelltransplantationsinglecenterrealworlddata AT schnitzlerpaul letermovirprophylaxisiseffectiveinpreventingcytomegalovirusreactivationafterallogeneichematopoieticcelltransplantationsinglecenterrealworlddata AT schoningtilman letermovirprophylaxisiseffectiveinpreventingcytomegalovirusreactivationafterallogeneichematopoieticcelltransplantationsinglecenterrealworlddata AT mullertidowcarsten letermovirprophylaxisiseffectiveinpreventingcytomegalovirusreactivationafterallogeneichematopoieticcelltransplantationsinglecenterrealworlddata AT hegenbartute letermovirprophylaxisiseffectiveinpreventingcytomegalovirusreactivationafterallogeneichematopoieticcelltransplantationsinglecenterrealworlddata AT schonlandstefano letermovirprophylaxisiseffectiveinpreventingcytomegalovirusreactivationafterallogeneichematopoieticcelltransplantationsinglecenterrealworlddata AT luftthomas letermovirprophylaxisiseffectiveinpreventingcytomegalovirusreactivationafterallogeneichematopoieticcelltransplantationsinglecenterrealworlddata AT dregerpeter letermovirprophylaxisiseffectiveinpreventingcytomegalovirusreactivationafterallogeneichematopoieticcelltransplantationsinglecenterrealworlddata AT schmittmichael letermovirprophylaxisiseffectiveinpreventingcytomegalovirusreactivationafterallogeneichematopoieticcelltransplantationsinglecenterrealworlddata |