Cargando…

Willingness to pay for and acceptance of cervical cancer prevention methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: The Willingness to pay (WTP) for and acceptance of cervical cancer prevention (CCP) methods have an important role in the control of this type of cancer. Therefore, the aim of this study was to estimate the WTP and acceptance of CCP methods with the contingent valuation method (CVM). Met...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shokri Jamnani, Anahita, Rezapour, Aziz, Moradi, Najmeh, Langarizadeh, Mostafa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Iran University of Medical Sciences 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8285557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34291005
http://dx.doi.org/10.47176/mjiri.35.81
_version_ 1783723583482101760
author Shokri Jamnani, Anahita
Rezapour, Aziz
Moradi, Najmeh
Langarizadeh, Mostafa
author_facet Shokri Jamnani, Anahita
Rezapour, Aziz
Moradi, Najmeh
Langarizadeh, Mostafa
author_sort Shokri Jamnani, Anahita
collection PubMed
description Background: The Willingness to pay (WTP) for and acceptance of cervical cancer prevention (CCP) methods have an important role in the control of this type of cancer. Therefore, the aim of this study was to estimate the WTP and acceptance of CCP methods with the contingent valuation method (CVM). Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis study, the required information was collected by searching relevant keywords in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Knowledge, and their Persian equivalent in the Scientific Information Database (SID) and Elmnet databases during January 1, 2000 to June 30, 2020. All studies that reported the WTP and CCP methods with the CVM in English or Persian were included. The reporting quality of studies was assessed by strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE). Comprehensive meta-analysis (CMA: 2) software was used to conduct the meta-analysis. The content analysis method was used for qualitative data analysis. Results: Finally, 28 articles (with 49610 people) were included in the study. Most of the participants were women (35.7%). The HPV vaccine was the most common method of prevention (75%). The overall acceptance rate was 64% and the overall positive WTP rate was 66%. The average WTP was US$30.44, which accounts for about 0.84% of GDP per capita. The most significant effective factors included income, age, education, high-risk sexual behaviors, and awareness of cervical cancer, belief in the risk of cervical cancer, and belief about the effectiveness of prevention methods. The cost was the most important reason for the unwillingness to pay and accept. Conclusion: Results show that the WTP and acceptance rate of CCP methods are relatively high. It is recommended to reduce the cost of prevention methods, especially the HPV vaccine, and to increase awareness and improve the attitude of people. Also, it is recommended to consider other methods of estimation of WTP and other cancers in future studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8285557
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Iran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82855572021-07-20 Willingness to pay for and acceptance of cervical cancer prevention methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis Shokri Jamnani, Anahita Rezapour, Aziz Moradi, Najmeh Langarizadeh, Mostafa Med J Islam Repub Iran Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Article Background: The Willingness to pay (WTP) for and acceptance of cervical cancer prevention (CCP) methods have an important role in the control of this type of cancer. Therefore, the aim of this study was to estimate the WTP and acceptance of CCP methods with the contingent valuation method (CVM). Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis study, the required information was collected by searching relevant keywords in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Knowledge, and their Persian equivalent in the Scientific Information Database (SID) and Elmnet databases during January 1, 2000 to June 30, 2020. All studies that reported the WTP and CCP methods with the CVM in English or Persian were included. The reporting quality of studies was assessed by strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE). Comprehensive meta-analysis (CMA: 2) software was used to conduct the meta-analysis. The content analysis method was used for qualitative data analysis. Results: Finally, 28 articles (with 49610 people) were included in the study. Most of the participants were women (35.7%). The HPV vaccine was the most common method of prevention (75%). The overall acceptance rate was 64% and the overall positive WTP rate was 66%. The average WTP was US$30.44, which accounts for about 0.84% of GDP per capita. The most significant effective factors included income, age, education, high-risk sexual behaviors, and awareness of cervical cancer, belief in the risk of cervical cancer, and belief about the effectiveness of prevention methods. The cost was the most important reason for the unwillingness to pay and accept. Conclusion: Results show that the WTP and acceptance rate of CCP methods are relatively high. It is recommended to reduce the cost of prevention methods, especially the HPV vaccine, and to increase awareness and improve the attitude of people. Also, it is recommended to consider other methods of estimation of WTP and other cancers in future studies. Iran University of Medical Sciences 2021-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8285557/ /pubmed/34291005 http://dx.doi.org/10.47176/mjiri.35.81 Text en © 2021 Iran University of Medical Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/1.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial-ShareAlike 1.0 License (CC BY-NC-SA 1.0), which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.
spellingShingle Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Article
Shokri Jamnani, Anahita
Rezapour, Aziz
Moradi, Najmeh
Langarizadeh, Mostafa
Willingness to pay for and acceptance of cervical cancer prevention methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Willingness to pay for and acceptance of cervical cancer prevention methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Willingness to pay for and acceptance of cervical cancer prevention methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Willingness to pay for and acceptance of cervical cancer prevention methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Willingness to pay for and acceptance of cervical cancer prevention methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Willingness to pay for and acceptance of cervical cancer prevention methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort willingness to pay for and acceptance of cervical cancer prevention methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8285557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34291005
http://dx.doi.org/10.47176/mjiri.35.81
work_keys_str_mv AT shokrijamnanianahita willingnesstopayforandacceptanceofcervicalcancerpreventionmethodsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rezapouraziz willingnesstopayforandacceptanceofcervicalcancerpreventionmethodsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT moradinajmeh willingnesstopayforandacceptanceofcervicalcancerpreventionmethodsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT langarizadehmostafa willingnesstopayforandacceptanceofcervicalcancerpreventionmethodsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis