Cargando…
Choices change the temporal weighting of decision evidence
Many decisions result from the accumulation of decision-relevant information (evidence) over time. Even when maximizing decision accuracy requires weighting all the evidence equally, decision-makers often give stronger weight to evidence occurring early or late in the evidence stream. Here, we show...
Autores principales: | Talluri, Bharath Chandra, Urai, Anne E., Bronfman, Zohar Z., Brezis, Noam, Tsetsos, Konstantinos, Usher, Marius, Donner, Tobias H. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Physiological Society
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8285578/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33689508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00462.2020 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Non-monotonic Temporal-Weighting Indicates a Dynamically Modulated Evidence-Integration Mechanism
por: Bronfman, Zohar Z., et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Adaptive Spontaneous Transitions between Two Mechanisms of Numerical Averaging
por: Brezis, Noam, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Choice history biases subsequent evidence accumulation
por: Urai, Anne E, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Testing Multi-Alternative Decision Models with Non-Stationary Evidence
por: Tsetsos, Konstantinos, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Pupil-linked phasic arousal predicts a reduction of choice bias across species and decision domains
por: de Gee, Jan Willem, et al.
Publicado: (2020)