Cargando…

Using AMANHI-ACT cohorts for external validation of Iowa new-born metabolic profiles based models for postnatal gestational age estimation

BACKGROUND: Globally, 15 million infants are born preterm and another 23.2 million infants are born small for gestational age (SGA). Determining burden of preterm and SGA births, is essential for effective planning, modification of health policies and targeting interventions for reducing these outco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sazawal, Sunil, Ryckman, Kelli K, Mittal, Harshita, Khanam, Rasheda, Nisar, Imran, Jasper, Elizabeth, Rahman, Sayedur, Mehmood, Usma, Das, Sayan, Bedell, Bruce, Chowdhury, Nabidul Haque, Barkat, Amina, Dutta, Arup, Deb, Saikat, Ahmed, Salahuddin, Khalid, Farah, Raqib, Rubhana, Ilyas, Muhammad, Nizar, Ambreen, Ali, Said Mohammed, Manu, Alexander, Yoshida, Sachiyo, Baqui, Abdullah H, Jehan, Fyezah, Dhingra, Usha, Bahl, Rajiv
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Society of Global Health 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8285766/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34326994
http://dx.doi.org/10.7189/jogh.11.04044
_version_ 1783723613966303232
author Sazawal, Sunil
Ryckman, Kelli K
Mittal, Harshita
Khanam, Rasheda
Nisar, Imran
Jasper, Elizabeth
Rahman, Sayedur
Mehmood, Usma
Das, Sayan
Bedell, Bruce
Chowdhury, Nabidul Haque
Barkat, Amina
Dutta, Arup
Deb, Saikat
Ahmed, Salahuddin
Khalid, Farah
Raqib, Rubhana
Ilyas, Muhammad
Nizar, Ambreen
Ali, Said Mohammed
Manu, Alexander
Yoshida, Sachiyo
Baqui, Abdullah H
Jehan, Fyezah
Dhingra, Usha
Bahl, Rajiv
author_facet Sazawal, Sunil
Ryckman, Kelli K
Mittal, Harshita
Khanam, Rasheda
Nisar, Imran
Jasper, Elizabeth
Rahman, Sayedur
Mehmood, Usma
Das, Sayan
Bedell, Bruce
Chowdhury, Nabidul Haque
Barkat, Amina
Dutta, Arup
Deb, Saikat
Ahmed, Salahuddin
Khalid, Farah
Raqib, Rubhana
Ilyas, Muhammad
Nizar, Ambreen
Ali, Said Mohammed
Manu, Alexander
Yoshida, Sachiyo
Baqui, Abdullah H
Jehan, Fyezah
Dhingra, Usha
Bahl, Rajiv
author_sort Sazawal, Sunil
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Globally, 15 million infants are born preterm and another 23.2 million infants are born small for gestational age (SGA). Determining burden of preterm and SGA births, is essential for effective planning, modification of health policies and targeting interventions for reducing these outcomes for which accurate estimation of gestational age (GA) is crucial. Early pregnancy ultrasound measurements, last menstrual period and post-natal neonatal examinations have proven to be not feasible or inaccurate. Proposed algorithms for GA estimation in western populations, based on routine new-born screening, though promising, lack validation in developing country settings. We evaluated the hypothesis that models developed in USA, also predicted GA in cohorts of South Asia (575) and Sub-Saharan Africa (736) with same precision. METHODS: Dried heel prick blood spots collected 24-72 hours after birth from 1311 new-borns, were analysed for standard metabolic screen. Regression algorithm based, GA estimates were computed from metabolic data and compared to first trimester ultrasound validated, GA estimates (gold standard). RESULTS: Overall Algorithm (metabolites + birthweight) estimated GA to within an average deviation of 1.5 weeks. The estimated GA was within the gold standard estimate by 1 and 2 weeks for 70.5% and 90.1% new-borns respectively. Inclusion of birthweight in the metabolites model improved discriminatory ability of this method, and showed promise in identifying preterm births. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis estimated an area under curve of 0.86 (conservative bootstrap 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.83 to 0.89); P < 0.001) and Youden Index of 0.58 (95% CI = 0.51 to 0.64) with a corresponding sensitivity of 80.7% and specificity of 77.6%. CONCLUSION: Metabolic gestational age dating offers a novel means for accurate population-level gestational age estimates in LMIC settings and help preterm birth surveillance initiatives. Further research should focus on use of machine learning and newer analytic methods broader than conventional metabolic screen analytes, enabling incorporation of region-specific analytes and cord blood metabolic profiles models predicting gestational age accurately.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8285766
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher International Society of Global Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82857662021-07-28 Using AMANHI-ACT cohorts for external validation of Iowa new-born metabolic profiles based models for postnatal gestational age estimation Sazawal, Sunil Ryckman, Kelli K Mittal, Harshita Khanam, Rasheda Nisar, Imran Jasper, Elizabeth Rahman, Sayedur Mehmood, Usma Das, Sayan Bedell, Bruce Chowdhury, Nabidul Haque Barkat, Amina Dutta, Arup Deb, Saikat Ahmed, Salahuddin Khalid, Farah Raqib, Rubhana Ilyas, Muhammad Nizar, Ambreen Ali, Said Mohammed Manu, Alexander Yoshida, Sachiyo Baqui, Abdullah H Jehan, Fyezah Dhingra, Usha Bahl, Rajiv J Glob Health Articles BACKGROUND: Globally, 15 million infants are born preterm and another 23.2 million infants are born small for gestational age (SGA). Determining burden of preterm and SGA births, is essential for effective planning, modification of health policies and targeting interventions for reducing these outcomes for which accurate estimation of gestational age (GA) is crucial. Early pregnancy ultrasound measurements, last menstrual period and post-natal neonatal examinations have proven to be not feasible or inaccurate. Proposed algorithms for GA estimation in western populations, based on routine new-born screening, though promising, lack validation in developing country settings. We evaluated the hypothesis that models developed in USA, also predicted GA in cohorts of South Asia (575) and Sub-Saharan Africa (736) with same precision. METHODS: Dried heel prick blood spots collected 24-72 hours after birth from 1311 new-borns, were analysed for standard metabolic screen. Regression algorithm based, GA estimates were computed from metabolic data and compared to first trimester ultrasound validated, GA estimates (gold standard). RESULTS: Overall Algorithm (metabolites + birthweight) estimated GA to within an average deviation of 1.5 weeks. The estimated GA was within the gold standard estimate by 1 and 2 weeks for 70.5% and 90.1% new-borns respectively. Inclusion of birthweight in the metabolites model improved discriminatory ability of this method, and showed promise in identifying preterm births. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis estimated an area under curve of 0.86 (conservative bootstrap 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.83 to 0.89); P < 0.001) and Youden Index of 0.58 (95% CI = 0.51 to 0.64) with a corresponding sensitivity of 80.7% and specificity of 77.6%. CONCLUSION: Metabolic gestational age dating offers a novel means for accurate population-level gestational age estimates in LMIC settings and help preterm birth surveillance initiatives. Further research should focus on use of machine learning and newer analytic methods broader than conventional metabolic screen analytes, enabling incorporation of region-specific analytes and cord blood metabolic profiles models predicting gestational age accurately. International Society of Global Health 2021-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8285766/ /pubmed/34326994 http://dx.doi.org/10.7189/jogh.11.04044 Text en Copyright © 2021 by the Journal of Global Health. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Articles
Sazawal, Sunil
Ryckman, Kelli K
Mittal, Harshita
Khanam, Rasheda
Nisar, Imran
Jasper, Elizabeth
Rahman, Sayedur
Mehmood, Usma
Das, Sayan
Bedell, Bruce
Chowdhury, Nabidul Haque
Barkat, Amina
Dutta, Arup
Deb, Saikat
Ahmed, Salahuddin
Khalid, Farah
Raqib, Rubhana
Ilyas, Muhammad
Nizar, Ambreen
Ali, Said Mohammed
Manu, Alexander
Yoshida, Sachiyo
Baqui, Abdullah H
Jehan, Fyezah
Dhingra, Usha
Bahl, Rajiv
Using AMANHI-ACT cohorts for external validation of Iowa new-born metabolic profiles based models for postnatal gestational age estimation
title Using AMANHI-ACT cohorts for external validation of Iowa new-born metabolic profiles based models for postnatal gestational age estimation
title_full Using AMANHI-ACT cohorts for external validation of Iowa new-born metabolic profiles based models for postnatal gestational age estimation
title_fullStr Using AMANHI-ACT cohorts for external validation of Iowa new-born metabolic profiles based models for postnatal gestational age estimation
title_full_unstemmed Using AMANHI-ACT cohorts for external validation of Iowa new-born metabolic profiles based models for postnatal gestational age estimation
title_short Using AMANHI-ACT cohorts for external validation of Iowa new-born metabolic profiles based models for postnatal gestational age estimation
title_sort using amanhi-act cohorts for external validation of iowa new-born metabolic profiles based models for postnatal gestational age estimation
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8285766/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34326994
http://dx.doi.org/10.7189/jogh.11.04044
work_keys_str_mv AT sazawalsunil usingamanhiactcohortsforexternalvalidationofiowanewbornmetabolicprofilesbasedmodelsforpostnatalgestationalageestimation
AT ryckmankellik usingamanhiactcohortsforexternalvalidationofiowanewbornmetabolicprofilesbasedmodelsforpostnatalgestationalageestimation
AT mittalharshita usingamanhiactcohortsforexternalvalidationofiowanewbornmetabolicprofilesbasedmodelsforpostnatalgestationalageestimation
AT khanamrasheda usingamanhiactcohortsforexternalvalidationofiowanewbornmetabolicprofilesbasedmodelsforpostnatalgestationalageestimation
AT nisarimran usingamanhiactcohortsforexternalvalidationofiowanewbornmetabolicprofilesbasedmodelsforpostnatalgestationalageestimation
AT jasperelizabeth usingamanhiactcohortsforexternalvalidationofiowanewbornmetabolicprofilesbasedmodelsforpostnatalgestationalageestimation
AT rahmansayedur usingamanhiactcohortsforexternalvalidationofiowanewbornmetabolicprofilesbasedmodelsforpostnatalgestationalageestimation
AT mehmoodusma usingamanhiactcohortsforexternalvalidationofiowanewbornmetabolicprofilesbasedmodelsforpostnatalgestationalageestimation
AT dassayan usingamanhiactcohortsforexternalvalidationofiowanewbornmetabolicprofilesbasedmodelsforpostnatalgestationalageestimation
AT bedellbruce usingamanhiactcohortsforexternalvalidationofiowanewbornmetabolicprofilesbasedmodelsforpostnatalgestationalageestimation
AT chowdhurynabidulhaque usingamanhiactcohortsforexternalvalidationofiowanewbornmetabolicprofilesbasedmodelsforpostnatalgestationalageestimation
AT barkatamina usingamanhiactcohortsforexternalvalidationofiowanewbornmetabolicprofilesbasedmodelsforpostnatalgestationalageestimation
AT duttaarup usingamanhiactcohortsforexternalvalidationofiowanewbornmetabolicprofilesbasedmodelsforpostnatalgestationalageestimation
AT debsaikat usingamanhiactcohortsforexternalvalidationofiowanewbornmetabolicprofilesbasedmodelsforpostnatalgestationalageestimation
AT ahmedsalahuddin usingamanhiactcohortsforexternalvalidationofiowanewbornmetabolicprofilesbasedmodelsforpostnatalgestationalageestimation
AT khalidfarah usingamanhiactcohortsforexternalvalidationofiowanewbornmetabolicprofilesbasedmodelsforpostnatalgestationalageestimation
AT raqibrubhana usingamanhiactcohortsforexternalvalidationofiowanewbornmetabolicprofilesbasedmodelsforpostnatalgestationalageestimation
AT ilyasmuhammad usingamanhiactcohortsforexternalvalidationofiowanewbornmetabolicprofilesbasedmodelsforpostnatalgestationalageestimation
AT nizarambreen usingamanhiactcohortsforexternalvalidationofiowanewbornmetabolicprofilesbasedmodelsforpostnatalgestationalageestimation
AT alisaidmohammed usingamanhiactcohortsforexternalvalidationofiowanewbornmetabolicprofilesbasedmodelsforpostnatalgestationalageestimation
AT manualexander usingamanhiactcohortsforexternalvalidationofiowanewbornmetabolicprofilesbasedmodelsforpostnatalgestationalageestimation
AT yoshidasachiyo usingamanhiactcohortsforexternalvalidationofiowanewbornmetabolicprofilesbasedmodelsforpostnatalgestationalageestimation
AT baquiabdullahh usingamanhiactcohortsforexternalvalidationofiowanewbornmetabolicprofilesbasedmodelsforpostnatalgestationalageestimation
AT jehanfyezah usingamanhiactcohortsforexternalvalidationofiowanewbornmetabolicprofilesbasedmodelsforpostnatalgestationalageestimation
AT dhingrausha usingamanhiactcohortsforexternalvalidationofiowanewbornmetabolicprofilesbasedmodelsforpostnatalgestationalageestimation
AT bahlrajiv usingamanhiactcohortsforexternalvalidationofiowanewbornmetabolicprofilesbasedmodelsforpostnatalgestationalageestimation