Cargando…
Using AMANHI-ACT cohorts for external validation of Iowa new-born metabolic profiles based models for postnatal gestational age estimation
BACKGROUND: Globally, 15 million infants are born preterm and another 23.2 million infants are born small for gestational age (SGA). Determining burden of preterm and SGA births, is essential for effective planning, modification of health policies and targeting interventions for reducing these outco...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Society of Global Health
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8285766/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34326994 http://dx.doi.org/10.7189/jogh.11.04044 |
_version_ | 1783723613966303232 |
---|---|
author | Sazawal, Sunil Ryckman, Kelli K Mittal, Harshita Khanam, Rasheda Nisar, Imran Jasper, Elizabeth Rahman, Sayedur Mehmood, Usma Das, Sayan Bedell, Bruce Chowdhury, Nabidul Haque Barkat, Amina Dutta, Arup Deb, Saikat Ahmed, Salahuddin Khalid, Farah Raqib, Rubhana Ilyas, Muhammad Nizar, Ambreen Ali, Said Mohammed Manu, Alexander Yoshida, Sachiyo Baqui, Abdullah H Jehan, Fyezah Dhingra, Usha Bahl, Rajiv |
author_facet | Sazawal, Sunil Ryckman, Kelli K Mittal, Harshita Khanam, Rasheda Nisar, Imran Jasper, Elizabeth Rahman, Sayedur Mehmood, Usma Das, Sayan Bedell, Bruce Chowdhury, Nabidul Haque Barkat, Amina Dutta, Arup Deb, Saikat Ahmed, Salahuddin Khalid, Farah Raqib, Rubhana Ilyas, Muhammad Nizar, Ambreen Ali, Said Mohammed Manu, Alexander Yoshida, Sachiyo Baqui, Abdullah H Jehan, Fyezah Dhingra, Usha Bahl, Rajiv |
author_sort | Sazawal, Sunil |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Globally, 15 million infants are born preterm and another 23.2 million infants are born small for gestational age (SGA). Determining burden of preterm and SGA births, is essential for effective planning, modification of health policies and targeting interventions for reducing these outcomes for which accurate estimation of gestational age (GA) is crucial. Early pregnancy ultrasound measurements, last menstrual period and post-natal neonatal examinations have proven to be not feasible or inaccurate. Proposed algorithms for GA estimation in western populations, based on routine new-born screening, though promising, lack validation in developing country settings. We evaluated the hypothesis that models developed in USA, also predicted GA in cohorts of South Asia (575) and Sub-Saharan Africa (736) with same precision. METHODS: Dried heel prick blood spots collected 24-72 hours after birth from 1311 new-borns, were analysed for standard metabolic screen. Regression algorithm based, GA estimates were computed from metabolic data and compared to first trimester ultrasound validated, GA estimates (gold standard). RESULTS: Overall Algorithm (metabolites + birthweight) estimated GA to within an average deviation of 1.5 weeks. The estimated GA was within the gold standard estimate by 1 and 2 weeks for 70.5% and 90.1% new-borns respectively. Inclusion of birthweight in the metabolites model improved discriminatory ability of this method, and showed promise in identifying preterm births. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis estimated an area under curve of 0.86 (conservative bootstrap 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.83 to 0.89); P < 0.001) and Youden Index of 0.58 (95% CI = 0.51 to 0.64) with a corresponding sensitivity of 80.7% and specificity of 77.6%. CONCLUSION: Metabolic gestational age dating offers a novel means for accurate population-level gestational age estimates in LMIC settings and help preterm birth surveillance initiatives. Further research should focus on use of machine learning and newer analytic methods broader than conventional metabolic screen analytes, enabling incorporation of region-specific analytes and cord blood metabolic profiles models predicting gestational age accurately. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8285766 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | International Society of Global Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82857662021-07-28 Using AMANHI-ACT cohorts for external validation of Iowa new-born metabolic profiles based models for postnatal gestational age estimation Sazawal, Sunil Ryckman, Kelli K Mittal, Harshita Khanam, Rasheda Nisar, Imran Jasper, Elizabeth Rahman, Sayedur Mehmood, Usma Das, Sayan Bedell, Bruce Chowdhury, Nabidul Haque Barkat, Amina Dutta, Arup Deb, Saikat Ahmed, Salahuddin Khalid, Farah Raqib, Rubhana Ilyas, Muhammad Nizar, Ambreen Ali, Said Mohammed Manu, Alexander Yoshida, Sachiyo Baqui, Abdullah H Jehan, Fyezah Dhingra, Usha Bahl, Rajiv J Glob Health Articles BACKGROUND: Globally, 15 million infants are born preterm and another 23.2 million infants are born small for gestational age (SGA). Determining burden of preterm and SGA births, is essential for effective planning, modification of health policies and targeting interventions for reducing these outcomes for which accurate estimation of gestational age (GA) is crucial. Early pregnancy ultrasound measurements, last menstrual period and post-natal neonatal examinations have proven to be not feasible or inaccurate. Proposed algorithms for GA estimation in western populations, based on routine new-born screening, though promising, lack validation in developing country settings. We evaluated the hypothesis that models developed in USA, also predicted GA in cohorts of South Asia (575) and Sub-Saharan Africa (736) with same precision. METHODS: Dried heel prick blood spots collected 24-72 hours after birth from 1311 new-borns, were analysed for standard metabolic screen. Regression algorithm based, GA estimates were computed from metabolic data and compared to first trimester ultrasound validated, GA estimates (gold standard). RESULTS: Overall Algorithm (metabolites + birthweight) estimated GA to within an average deviation of 1.5 weeks. The estimated GA was within the gold standard estimate by 1 and 2 weeks for 70.5% and 90.1% new-borns respectively. Inclusion of birthweight in the metabolites model improved discriminatory ability of this method, and showed promise in identifying preterm births. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis estimated an area under curve of 0.86 (conservative bootstrap 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.83 to 0.89); P < 0.001) and Youden Index of 0.58 (95% CI = 0.51 to 0.64) with a corresponding sensitivity of 80.7% and specificity of 77.6%. CONCLUSION: Metabolic gestational age dating offers a novel means for accurate population-level gestational age estimates in LMIC settings and help preterm birth surveillance initiatives. Further research should focus on use of machine learning and newer analytic methods broader than conventional metabolic screen analytes, enabling incorporation of region-specific analytes and cord blood metabolic profiles models predicting gestational age accurately. International Society of Global Health 2021-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8285766/ /pubmed/34326994 http://dx.doi.org/10.7189/jogh.11.04044 Text en Copyright © 2021 by the Journal of Global Health. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
spellingShingle | Articles Sazawal, Sunil Ryckman, Kelli K Mittal, Harshita Khanam, Rasheda Nisar, Imran Jasper, Elizabeth Rahman, Sayedur Mehmood, Usma Das, Sayan Bedell, Bruce Chowdhury, Nabidul Haque Barkat, Amina Dutta, Arup Deb, Saikat Ahmed, Salahuddin Khalid, Farah Raqib, Rubhana Ilyas, Muhammad Nizar, Ambreen Ali, Said Mohammed Manu, Alexander Yoshida, Sachiyo Baqui, Abdullah H Jehan, Fyezah Dhingra, Usha Bahl, Rajiv Using AMANHI-ACT cohorts for external validation of Iowa new-born metabolic profiles based models for postnatal gestational age estimation |
title | Using AMANHI-ACT cohorts for external validation of Iowa new-born metabolic profiles based models for postnatal gestational age estimation |
title_full | Using AMANHI-ACT cohorts for external validation of Iowa new-born metabolic profiles based models for postnatal gestational age estimation |
title_fullStr | Using AMANHI-ACT cohorts for external validation of Iowa new-born metabolic profiles based models for postnatal gestational age estimation |
title_full_unstemmed | Using AMANHI-ACT cohorts for external validation of Iowa new-born metabolic profiles based models for postnatal gestational age estimation |
title_short | Using AMANHI-ACT cohorts for external validation of Iowa new-born metabolic profiles based models for postnatal gestational age estimation |
title_sort | using amanhi-act cohorts for external validation of iowa new-born metabolic profiles based models for postnatal gestational age estimation |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8285766/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34326994 http://dx.doi.org/10.7189/jogh.11.04044 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sazawalsunil usingamanhiactcohortsforexternalvalidationofiowanewbornmetabolicprofilesbasedmodelsforpostnatalgestationalageestimation AT ryckmankellik usingamanhiactcohortsforexternalvalidationofiowanewbornmetabolicprofilesbasedmodelsforpostnatalgestationalageestimation AT mittalharshita usingamanhiactcohortsforexternalvalidationofiowanewbornmetabolicprofilesbasedmodelsforpostnatalgestationalageestimation AT khanamrasheda usingamanhiactcohortsforexternalvalidationofiowanewbornmetabolicprofilesbasedmodelsforpostnatalgestationalageestimation AT nisarimran usingamanhiactcohortsforexternalvalidationofiowanewbornmetabolicprofilesbasedmodelsforpostnatalgestationalageestimation AT jasperelizabeth usingamanhiactcohortsforexternalvalidationofiowanewbornmetabolicprofilesbasedmodelsforpostnatalgestationalageestimation AT rahmansayedur usingamanhiactcohortsforexternalvalidationofiowanewbornmetabolicprofilesbasedmodelsforpostnatalgestationalageestimation AT mehmoodusma usingamanhiactcohortsforexternalvalidationofiowanewbornmetabolicprofilesbasedmodelsforpostnatalgestationalageestimation AT dassayan usingamanhiactcohortsforexternalvalidationofiowanewbornmetabolicprofilesbasedmodelsforpostnatalgestationalageestimation AT bedellbruce usingamanhiactcohortsforexternalvalidationofiowanewbornmetabolicprofilesbasedmodelsforpostnatalgestationalageestimation AT chowdhurynabidulhaque usingamanhiactcohortsforexternalvalidationofiowanewbornmetabolicprofilesbasedmodelsforpostnatalgestationalageestimation AT barkatamina usingamanhiactcohortsforexternalvalidationofiowanewbornmetabolicprofilesbasedmodelsforpostnatalgestationalageestimation AT duttaarup usingamanhiactcohortsforexternalvalidationofiowanewbornmetabolicprofilesbasedmodelsforpostnatalgestationalageestimation AT debsaikat usingamanhiactcohortsforexternalvalidationofiowanewbornmetabolicprofilesbasedmodelsforpostnatalgestationalageestimation AT ahmedsalahuddin usingamanhiactcohortsforexternalvalidationofiowanewbornmetabolicprofilesbasedmodelsforpostnatalgestationalageestimation AT khalidfarah usingamanhiactcohortsforexternalvalidationofiowanewbornmetabolicprofilesbasedmodelsforpostnatalgestationalageestimation AT raqibrubhana usingamanhiactcohortsforexternalvalidationofiowanewbornmetabolicprofilesbasedmodelsforpostnatalgestationalageestimation AT ilyasmuhammad usingamanhiactcohortsforexternalvalidationofiowanewbornmetabolicprofilesbasedmodelsforpostnatalgestationalageestimation AT nizarambreen usingamanhiactcohortsforexternalvalidationofiowanewbornmetabolicprofilesbasedmodelsforpostnatalgestationalageestimation AT alisaidmohammed usingamanhiactcohortsforexternalvalidationofiowanewbornmetabolicprofilesbasedmodelsforpostnatalgestationalageestimation AT manualexander usingamanhiactcohortsforexternalvalidationofiowanewbornmetabolicprofilesbasedmodelsforpostnatalgestationalageestimation AT yoshidasachiyo usingamanhiactcohortsforexternalvalidationofiowanewbornmetabolicprofilesbasedmodelsforpostnatalgestationalageestimation AT baquiabdullahh usingamanhiactcohortsforexternalvalidationofiowanewbornmetabolicprofilesbasedmodelsforpostnatalgestationalageestimation AT jehanfyezah usingamanhiactcohortsforexternalvalidationofiowanewbornmetabolicprofilesbasedmodelsforpostnatalgestationalageestimation AT dhingrausha usingamanhiactcohortsforexternalvalidationofiowanewbornmetabolicprofilesbasedmodelsforpostnatalgestationalageestimation AT bahlrajiv usingamanhiactcohortsforexternalvalidationofiowanewbornmetabolicprofilesbasedmodelsforpostnatalgestationalageestimation |