Cargando…
Sensory Stimulation Threshold: A Viable Tool to Improve the Outcome of Lumbar Facet Radiofrequency Denervation?
BACKGROUND: Sensory stimulation threshold (SST) has been used as a surrogate marker to target a nerve branch for radiofrequency (RF) denervation; however, the validity of SST as a prognostic marker is still under debate. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether lower SST values correlate with better outcomes of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8286126/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34285571 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S319622 |
_version_ | 1783723680398835712 |
---|---|
author | Shi, Weibin Rudra, Renuka Vu, To-Nhu Gordin, Yuri Smith, Ryan Kunselman, Allen R |
author_facet | Shi, Weibin Rudra, Renuka Vu, To-Nhu Gordin, Yuri Smith, Ryan Kunselman, Allen R |
author_sort | Shi, Weibin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Sensory stimulation threshold (SST) has been used as a surrogate marker to target a nerve branch for radiofrequency (RF) denervation; however, the validity of SST as a prognostic marker is still under debate. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether lower SST values correlate with better outcomes of radiofrequency denervation for facetogenic low back pain. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PATIENTS: Sixty-seven patients who underwent radiofrequency denervation for low back pain. METHODS: Correlations, between the average percentage of pain relief from diagnostic medial branch block (MBB) and RF denervation procedure outcome, and between SST and RF denervation procedure outcome, were analyzed using Spearman correlation coefficient (r(s)). Wilcoxon rank sum test was performed to assess whether magnitude and duration of pain relief following RF denervation differed by the levels of SST (<0.5 and ≥0.5) or pain relief (<80% and ≥80%) from diagnostic MBB. RESULTS: There was a positive correlation between pain relief after diagnostic MBB and pain relief 2 weeks after denervation (r(s) 0.31, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.51, p < 0.01), but not between pain relief after MBB and pain relief 6 months after denervation, nor pain relief duration after denervation. There was a negative correlation between SST and pain relief 6 months after denervation (r(s) −0.41, 95% CI −0.59 to −0.18, p < 0.001). There was also a negative correlation between SST and pain relief duration after denervation (r(s) −0.33, 95% CI −0.53 to −0.09, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: SST is a viable measurement with which to guide needle placement during RF denervation for lumbar facet pain, and enhances pain relief outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8286126 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82861262021-07-19 Sensory Stimulation Threshold: A Viable Tool to Improve the Outcome of Lumbar Facet Radiofrequency Denervation? Shi, Weibin Rudra, Renuka Vu, To-Nhu Gordin, Yuri Smith, Ryan Kunselman, Allen R J Pain Res Original Research BACKGROUND: Sensory stimulation threshold (SST) has been used as a surrogate marker to target a nerve branch for radiofrequency (RF) denervation; however, the validity of SST as a prognostic marker is still under debate. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether lower SST values correlate with better outcomes of radiofrequency denervation for facetogenic low back pain. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PATIENTS: Sixty-seven patients who underwent radiofrequency denervation for low back pain. METHODS: Correlations, between the average percentage of pain relief from diagnostic medial branch block (MBB) and RF denervation procedure outcome, and between SST and RF denervation procedure outcome, were analyzed using Spearman correlation coefficient (r(s)). Wilcoxon rank sum test was performed to assess whether magnitude and duration of pain relief following RF denervation differed by the levels of SST (<0.5 and ≥0.5) or pain relief (<80% and ≥80%) from diagnostic MBB. RESULTS: There was a positive correlation between pain relief after diagnostic MBB and pain relief 2 weeks after denervation (r(s) 0.31, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.51, p < 0.01), but not between pain relief after MBB and pain relief 6 months after denervation, nor pain relief duration after denervation. There was a negative correlation between SST and pain relief 6 months after denervation (r(s) −0.41, 95% CI −0.59 to −0.18, p < 0.001). There was also a negative correlation between SST and pain relief duration after denervation (r(s) −0.33, 95% CI −0.53 to −0.09, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: SST is a viable measurement with which to guide needle placement during RF denervation for lumbar facet pain, and enhances pain relief outcomes. Dove 2021-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8286126/ /pubmed/34285571 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S319622 Text en © 2021 Shi et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Shi, Weibin Rudra, Renuka Vu, To-Nhu Gordin, Yuri Smith, Ryan Kunselman, Allen R Sensory Stimulation Threshold: A Viable Tool to Improve the Outcome of Lumbar Facet Radiofrequency Denervation? |
title | Sensory Stimulation Threshold: A Viable Tool to Improve the Outcome of Lumbar Facet Radiofrequency Denervation? |
title_full | Sensory Stimulation Threshold: A Viable Tool to Improve the Outcome of Lumbar Facet Radiofrequency Denervation? |
title_fullStr | Sensory Stimulation Threshold: A Viable Tool to Improve the Outcome of Lumbar Facet Radiofrequency Denervation? |
title_full_unstemmed | Sensory Stimulation Threshold: A Viable Tool to Improve the Outcome of Lumbar Facet Radiofrequency Denervation? |
title_short | Sensory Stimulation Threshold: A Viable Tool to Improve the Outcome of Lumbar Facet Radiofrequency Denervation? |
title_sort | sensory stimulation threshold: a viable tool to improve the outcome of lumbar facet radiofrequency denervation? |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8286126/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34285571 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S319622 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shiweibin sensorystimulationthresholdaviabletooltoimprovetheoutcomeoflumbarfacetradiofrequencydenervation AT rudrarenuka sensorystimulationthresholdaviabletooltoimprovetheoutcomeoflumbarfacetradiofrequencydenervation AT vutonhu sensorystimulationthresholdaviabletooltoimprovetheoutcomeoflumbarfacetradiofrequencydenervation AT gordinyuri sensorystimulationthresholdaviabletooltoimprovetheoutcomeoflumbarfacetradiofrequencydenervation AT smithryan sensorystimulationthresholdaviabletooltoimprovetheoutcomeoflumbarfacetradiofrequencydenervation AT kunselmanallenr sensorystimulationthresholdaviabletooltoimprovetheoutcomeoflumbarfacetradiofrequencydenervation |