Cargando…
Is Bigger Better? Living Donor Kidney Volume as Measured by the Donor CT Angiogram in Predicting Donor and Recipient eGFR after Living Donor Kidney Transplantation
BACKGROUND: The role of kidney volume measurement in predicting the donor and recipient kidney function is not clear. METHODS: We measured kidney volume bilaterally in living kidney donors using CT angiography and assessed the association with the donor remaining kidney and recipient kidney (donated...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8286185/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34336253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8885354 |
_version_ | 1783723693355040768 |
---|---|
author | Ebad, Chaudhry Adeel Brennan, David Chevarria, Julio Hussein, Mohammad Bin Sexton, Donal Mulholland, Douglas Doyle, Ciaran O'Kelly, Patrick Williams, Yvonne Dunne, Ruth O'Seaghdha, Conall Little, Dilly Morrin, Martina Conlon, Peter J. |
author_facet | Ebad, Chaudhry Adeel Brennan, David Chevarria, Julio Hussein, Mohammad Bin Sexton, Donal Mulholland, Douglas Doyle, Ciaran O'Kelly, Patrick Williams, Yvonne Dunne, Ruth O'Seaghdha, Conall Little, Dilly Morrin, Martina Conlon, Peter J. |
author_sort | Ebad, Chaudhry Adeel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The role of kidney volume measurement in predicting the donor and recipient kidney function is not clear. METHODS: We measured kidney volume bilaterally in living kidney donors using CT angiography and assessed the association with the donor remaining kidney and recipient kidney (donated kidney) function at 1 year after kidney transplantation. Donor volume was categorized into tertiles based on lowest, middle, and highest volume. RESULTS: There were 166 living donor and recipient pairs. The mean donor age was 44.8 years (SD ± 10.8), and donor mean BMI was 25.5 (SD ± 2.9). The recipients of living donor kidneys were 64% male and had a mean age of 43.5 years (SD ± 13.3). Six percent of patients experienced an episode of cellular rejection and were maintained on dialysis for a mean of 18 months (13–32) prior to transplant. Kidney volume was divided into tertiles based on lowest, middle, and highest volume. Kidney volume median (range) in tertiles 1, 2, and 3 was 124 (89–135 ml), 155 (136–164 ml), and 184 (165–240 ml) with donor eGFR ml/min (adjusted for body surface area expressed as ml/min/1.73 m(2)) at the time of donation in each tertile, 109 (93–129), 110 (92–132), and 101 ml/min (84–117). The median (IQR) eGFR in tertiles 1 to 3 in kidney recipients at 1 year after donation was 54 (44–67), 62 (50–75), and 63 ml/min (58–79), respectively. The median (IQR) eGFR in tertiles 1 to 3 in the remaining kidney of donors at 1 year after donation was 59 (53–66), 65 (57–72), and 65 ml/min (56–73), respectively. CONCLUSION: Bigger kidney volume was associated with better eGFR at 1 year after transplant in the recipient and marginally in the donor remaining kidney. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8286185 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82861852021-07-30 Is Bigger Better? Living Donor Kidney Volume as Measured by the Donor CT Angiogram in Predicting Donor and Recipient eGFR after Living Donor Kidney Transplantation Ebad, Chaudhry Adeel Brennan, David Chevarria, Julio Hussein, Mohammad Bin Sexton, Donal Mulholland, Douglas Doyle, Ciaran O'Kelly, Patrick Williams, Yvonne Dunne, Ruth O'Seaghdha, Conall Little, Dilly Morrin, Martina Conlon, Peter J. J Transplant Research Article BACKGROUND: The role of kidney volume measurement in predicting the donor and recipient kidney function is not clear. METHODS: We measured kidney volume bilaterally in living kidney donors using CT angiography and assessed the association with the donor remaining kidney and recipient kidney (donated kidney) function at 1 year after kidney transplantation. Donor volume was categorized into tertiles based on lowest, middle, and highest volume. RESULTS: There were 166 living donor and recipient pairs. The mean donor age was 44.8 years (SD ± 10.8), and donor mean BMI was 25.5 (SD ± 2.9). The recipients of living donor kidneys were 64% male and had a mean age of 43.5 years (SD ± 13.3). Six percent of patients experienced an episode of cellular rejection and were maintained on dialysis for a mean of 18 months (13–32) prior to transplant. Kidney volume was divided into tertiles based on lowest, middle, and highest volume. Kidney volume median (range) in tertiles 1, 2, and 3 was 124 (89–135 ml), 155 (136–164 ml), and 184 (165–240 ml) with donor eGFR ml/min (adjusted for body surface area expressed as ml/min/1.73 m(2)) at the time of donation in each tertile, 109 (93–129), 110 (92–132), and 101 ml/min (84–117). The median (IQR) eGFR in tertiles 1 to 3 in kidney recipients at 1 year after donation was 54 (44–67), 62 (50–75), and 63 ml/min (58–79), respectively. The median (IQR) eGFR in tertiles 1 to 3 in the remaining kidney of donors at 1 year after donation was 59 (53–66), 65 (57–72), and 65 ml/min (56–73), respectively. CONCLUSION: Bigger kidney volume was associated with better eGFR at 1 year after transplant in the recipient and marginally in the donor remaining kidney. Hindawi 2021-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8286185/ /pubmed/34336253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8885354 Text en Copyright © 2021 Chaudhry Adeel Ebad et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ebad, Chaudhry Adeel Brennan, David Chevarria, Julio Hussein, Mohammad Bin Sexton, Donal Mulholland, Douglas Doyle, Ciaran O'Kelly, Patrick Williams, Yvonne Dunne, Ruth O'Seaghdha, Conall Little, Dilly Morrin, Martina Conlon, Peter J. Is Bigger Better? Living Donor Kidney Volume as Measured by the Donor CT Angiogram in Predicting Donor and Recipient eGFR after Living Donor Kidney Transplantation |
title | Is Bigger Better? Living Donor Kidney Volume as Measured by the Donor CT Angiogram in Predicting Donor and Recipient eGFR after Living Donor Kidney Transplantation |
title_full | Is Bigger Better? Living Donor Kidney Volume as Measured by the Donor CT Angiogram in Predicting Donor and Recipient eGFR after Living Donor Kidney Transplantation |
title_fullStr | Is Bigger Better? Living Donor Kidney Volume as Measured by the Donor CT Angiogram in Predicting Donor and Recipient eGFR after Living Donor Kidney Transplantation |
title_full_unstemmed | Is Bigger Better? Living Donor Kidney Volume as Measured by the Donor CT Angiogram in Predicting Donor and Recipient eGFR after Living Donor Kidney Transplantation |
title_short | Is Bigger Better? Living Donor Kidney Volume as Measured by the Donor CT Angiogram in Predicting Donor and Recipient eGFR after Living Donor Kidney Transplantation |
title_sort | is bigger better? living donor kidney volume as measured by the donor ct angiogram in predicting donor and recipient egfr after living donor kidney transplantation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8286185/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34336253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8885354 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ebadchaudhryadeel isbiggerbetterlivingdonorkidneyvolumeasmeasuredbythedonorctangiograminpredictingdonorandrecipientegfrafterlivingdonorkidneytransplantation AT brennandavid isbiggerbetterlivingdonorkidneyvolumeasmeasuredbythedonorctangiograminpredictingdonorandrecipientegfrafterlivingdonorkidneytransplantation AT chevarriajulio isbiggerbetterlivingdonorkidneyvolumeasmeasuredbythedonorctangiograminpredictingdonorandrecipientegfrafterlivingdonorkidneytransplantation AT husseinmohammadbin isbiggerbetterlivingdonorkidneyvolumeasmeasuredbythedonorctangiograminpredictingdonorandrecipientegfrafterlivingdonorkidneytransplantation AT sextondonal isbiggerbetterlivingdonorkidneyvolumeasmeasuredbythedonorctangiograminpredictingdonorandrecipientegfrafterlivingdonorkidneytransplantation AT mulhollanddouglas isbiggerbetterlivingdonorkidneyvolumeasmeasuredbythedonorctangiograminpredictingdonorandrecipientegfrafterlivingdonorkidneytransplantation AT doyleciaran isbiggerbetterlivingdonorkidneyvolumeasmeasuredbythedonorctangiograminpredictingdonorandrecipientegfrafterlivingdonorkidneytransplantation AT okellypatrick isbiggerbetterlivingdonorkidneyvolumeasmeasuredbythedonorctangiograminpredictingdonorandrecipientegfrafterlivingdonorkidneytransplantation AT williamsyvonne isbiggerbetterlivingdonorkidneyvolumeasmeasuredbythedonorctangiograminpredictingdonorandrecipientegfrafterlivingdonorkidneytransplantation AT dunneruth isbiggerbetterlivingdonorkidneyvolumeasmeasuredbythedonorctangiograminpredictingdonorandrecipientegfrafterlivingdonorkidneytransplantation AT oseaghdhaconall isbiggerbetterlivingdonorkidneyvolumeasmeasuredbythedonorctangiograminpredictingdonorandrecipientegfrafterlivingdonorkidneytransplantation AT littledilly isbiggerbetterlivingdonorkidneyvolumeasmeasuredbythedonorctangiograminpredictingdonorandrecipientegfrafterlivingdonorkidneytransplantation AT morrinmartina isbiggerbetterlivingdonorkidneyvolumeasmeasuredbythedonorctangiograminpredictingdonorandrecipientegfrafterlivingdonorkidneytransplantation AT conlonpeterj isbiggerbetterlivingdonorkidneyvolumeasmeasuredbythedonorctangiograminpredictingdonorandrecipientegfrafterlivingdonorkidneytransplantation |