Cargando…
EMAC, Retromer, and VSRs: do they connect?
Eukaryotic organisms share many common features in terms of endomembrane trafficking. This fact has helped plant scientists to propose testable hypotheses on how plant intracellular membrane trafficking is achieved and regulated based on knowledge from yeast and mammals. However, when a new compartm...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Vienna
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8286218/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32780164 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00709-020-01543-8 |
_version_ | 1783723700938342400 |
---|---|
author | Ivanov, Rumen Robinson, David G. |
author_facet | Ivanov, Rumen Robinson, David G. |
author_sort | Ivanov, Rumen |
collection | PubMed |
description | Eukaryotic organisms share many common features in terms of endomembrane trafficking. This fact has helped plant scientists to propose testable hypotheses on how plant intracellular membrane trafficking is achieved and regulated based on knowledge from yeast and mammals. However, when a new compartment has been identified in a plant cell that has a vesicle tethering complex located at a position which is completely different to its counterpart in yeast and mammalian cells, caution is demanded when interpreting possible interactions with other trafficking elements. This is exemplified by the recently discovered EMAC (ER and microtubule-associated compartment). It has been postulated that this compartment is the recipient of vacuolar sorting receptors (VSRs) transported retrogradely via “retromer vesicles” from a post-Golgi location. Unfortunately, this suggestion was based entirely on our knowledge of retromer from yeast and mammalian cells, and did not take into account the available literature on the composition, localization, and function of the plant retromer. It also lacked reference to recent contradictory findings on VSR trafficking. In this short article, we have tried to rectify this situation, pointing out that plant retromer may not function as a pentameric complex of two subunits: the retromer core and the sorting nexins. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8286218 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Vienna |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82862182021-07-20 EMAC, Retromer, and VSRs: do they connect? Ivanov, Rumen Robinson, David G. Protoplasma New Ideas in Cell Biology Eukaryotic organisms share many common features in terms of endomembrane trafficking. This fact has helped plant scientists to propose testable hypotheses on how plant intracellular membrane trafficking is achieved and regulated based on knowledge from yeast and mammals. However, when a new compartment has been identified in a plant cell that has a vesicle tethering complex located at a position which is completely different to its counterpart in yeast and mammalian cells, caution is demanded when interpreting possible interactions with other trafficking elements. This is exemplified by the recently discovered EMAC (ER and microtubule-associated compartment). It has been postulated that this compartment is the recipient of vacuolar sorting receptors (VSRs) transported retrogradely via “retromer vesicles” from a post-Golgi location. Unfortunately, this suggestion was based entirely on our knowledge of retromer from yeast and mammalian cells, and did not take into account the available literature on the composition, localization, and function of the plant retromer. It also lacked reference to recent contradictory findings on VSR trafficking. In this short article, we have tried to rectify this situation, pointing out that plant retromer may not function as a pentameric complex of two subunits: the retromer core and the sorting nexins. Springer Vienna 2020-08-11 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC8286218/ /pubmed/32780164 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00709-020-01543-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020, corrected publication 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | New Ideas in Cell Biology Ivanov, Rumen Robinson, David G. EMAC, Retromer, and VSRs: do they connect? |
title | EMAC, Retromer, and VSRs: do they connect? |
title_full | EMAC, Retromer, and VSRs: do they connect? |
title_fullStr | EMAC, Retromer, and VSRs: do they connect? |
title_full_unstemmed | EMAC, Retromer, and VSRs: do they connect? |
title_short | EMAC, Retromer, and VSRs: do they connect? |
title_sort | emac, retromer, and vsrs: do they connect? |
topic | New Ideas in Cell Biology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8286218/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32780164 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00709-020-01543-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ivanovrumen emacretromerandvsrsdotheyconnect AT robinsondavidg emacretromerandvsrsdotheyconnect |