Cargando…
The effect of prehospital intravenous access in traumatic shock: a Japanese nationwide cohort study
AIM: We aimed to evaluate effect of prehospital intravenous (IV) access on mortality in traumatic shock using a large nationwide dataset. METHODS: We used the Japan Trauma Data Bank to identify adults (≥18 years) with a systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg at the trauma scene and were directly trans...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8286450/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34295503 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ams2.681 |
Sumario: | AIM: We aimed to evaluate effect of prehospital intravenous (IV) access on mortality in traumatic shock using a large nationwide dataset. METHODS: We used the Japan Trauma Data Bank to identify adults (≥18 years) with a systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg at the trauma scene and were directly transported to the hospital between 2010 and 2019. We compared patients who had prehospital IV access (IV (+)) or not (IV (−)), using propensity score‐matched analysis, and 1:1 nearest‐neighbor matching without replacement. Standardized mean difference was used to evaluate the match balance between the two matched groups; a standardized mean difference >0.1 was considered a significant imbalance. Primary outcome was 72‐h mortality. RESULTS: Propensity scores matching generated 479 pairs from 5,857 patients. No significant between group differences occurred in 72‐h mortality (7.8 versus 8.8%; difference, −1.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: −2.5–4.5%), 28‐day mortality (11.8 versus 11.3%; 95% CI: −4.6–3.6%), blood transfusion administration within 24 h (55.3 versus 49.1%; 95% CI: −0.1–12.6%), prehospital time (56.3 versus 53.0 min; 95% CI: −1.8–8.4 min), and cardiopulmonary arrest on hospital arrival (1.3 versus 1.3%; 95% CI: −1.4–1.4%). However, significantly higher systolic blood pressure on hospital arrival was found in the IV (+) than in the IV (−) group (104.6 versus 100.1 mm Hg; 95% CI: 0.3‐8.7 mm Hg). CONCLUSION: We found no significant effect of establishing IV access in the prehospital setting on survival outcomes of patients with traumatic shock. |
---|