Cargando…
Participatory co-design and normalisation process theory with staff and patients to implement digital ways of working into routine care: the example of electronic patient-reported outcomes in UK renal services
BACKGROUND: Successful implementation of digital health systems requires contextually sensitive solutions. Working directly with system users and drawing on implementation science frameworks are both recommended. We sought to combine Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) with participatory co-design me...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8286572/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34273978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06702-y |
_version_ | 1783723741062103040 |
---|---|
author | Knowles, S. E. Ercia, A. Caskey, F. Rees, M. Farrington, K. Van der Veer, S. N. |
author_facet | Knowles, S. E. Ercia, A. Caskey, F. Rees, M. Farrington, K. Van der Veer, S. N. |
author_sort | Knowles, S. E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Successful implementation of digital health systems requires contextually sensitive solutions. Working directly with system users and drawing on implementation science frameworks are both recommended. We sought to combine Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) with participatory co-design methods, to work with healthcare stakeholders to generate implementation support recommendations for a new electronic patient reported outcome measure (ePRO) in renal services. ePROs collect data on patient-reported symptom burden and illness experience overtime, requiring sustained engagement and integration into existing systems. METHODS: We identified co-design methods that could be mapped to NPT constructs to generate relevant qualitative data. Patients and staff from three renal units in England participated in empathy and process mapping activities to understand ‘coherence’ (why the ePRO should be completed) and ‘cognitive participation’ (who would be involved in collecting the ePRO). Observation of routine unit activity was completed to understand ‘collective action’ (how the collection of ePRO could integrate with service routines). RESULTS: The mapping activities and observation enabled the research team to become more aware of the key needs of both staff and patients. Working within sites enabled us to consider local resources and barriers. This produced ‘core and custom’ recommendations specifying core needs that could be met with customised local solutions. We identified two over-arching themes which need to be considered when introducing new digital systems (1) That data collection is physical (electronic systems need to fit into physical spaces and routines), and (2) That data collection is intentional (system users must be convinced of the value of collecting the data). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that NPT constructs can be operationalised through participatory co-design to work with stakeholders and within settings to collaboratively produce implementation support recommendations. This enables production of contextually sensitive implementation recommendations, informed by qualitative evidence, theory, and stakeholder input. Further longitudinal evaluation is necessary to determine how successful the recommendations are in practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8286572 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82865722021-07-19 Participatory co-design and normalisation process theory with staff and patients to implement digital ways of working into routine care: the example of electronic patient-reported outcomes in UK renal services Knowles, S. E. Ercia, A. Caskey, F. Rees, M. Farrington, K. Van der Veer, S. N. BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: Successful implementation of digital health systems requires contextually sensitive solutions. Working directly with system users and drawing on implementation science frameworks are both recommended. We sought to combine Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) with participatory co-design methods, to work with healthcare stakeholders to generate implementation support recommendations for a new electronic patient reported outcome measure (ePRO) in renal services. ePROs collect data on patient-reported symptom burden and illness experience overtime, requiring sustained engagement and integration into existing systems. METHODS: We identified co-design methods that could be mapped to NPT constructs to generate relevant qualitative data. Patients and staff from three renal units in England participated in empathy and process mapping activities to understand ‘coherence’ (why the ePRO should be completed) and ‘cognitive participation’ (who would be involved in collecting the ePRO). Observation of routine unit activity was completed to understand ‘collective action’ (how the collection of ePRO could integrate with service routines). RESULTS: The mapping activities and observation enabled the research team to become more aware of the key needs of both staff and patients. Working within sites enabled us to consider local resources and barriers. This produced ‘core and custom’ recommendations specifying core needs that could be met with customised local solutions. We identified two over-arching themes which need to be considered when introducing new digital systems (1) That data collection is physical (electronic systems need to fit into physical spaces and routines), and (2) That data collection is intentional (system users must be convinced of the value of collecting the data). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that NPT constructs can be operationalised through participatory co-design to work with stakeholders and within settings to collaboratively produce implementation support recommendations. This enables production of contextually sensitive implementation recommendations, informed by qualitative evidence, theory, and stakeholder input. Further longitudinal evaluation is necessary to determine how successful the recommendations are in practice. BioMed Central 2021-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8286572/ /pubmed/34273978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06702-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Knowles, S. E. Ercia, A. Caskey, F. Rees, M. Farrington, K. Van der Veer, S. N. Participatory co-design and normalisation process theory with staff and patients to implement digital ways of working into routine care: the example of electronic patient-reported outcomes in UK renal services |
title | Participatory co-design and normalisation process theory with staff and patients to implement digital ways of working into routine care: the example of electronic patient-reported outcomes in UK renal services |
title_full | Participatory co-design and normalisation process theory with staff and patients to implement digital ways of working into routine care: the example of electronic patient-reported outcomes in UK renal services |
title_fullStr | Participatory co-design and normalisation process theory with staff and patients to implement digital ways of working into routine care: the example of electronic patient-reported outcomes in UK renal services |
title_full_unstemmed | Participatory co-design and normalisation process theory with staff and patients to implement digital ways of working into routine care: the example of electronic patient-reported outcomes in UK renal services |
title_short | Participatory co-design and normalisation process theory with staff and patients to implement digital ways of working into routine care: the example of electronic patient-reported outcomes in UK renal services |
title_sort | participatory co-design and normalisation process theory with staff and patients to implement digital ways of working into routine care: the example of electronic patient-reported outcomes in uk renal services |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8286572/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34273978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06702-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT knowlesse participatorycodesignandnormalisationprocesstheorywithstaffandpatientstoimplementdigitalwaysofworkingintoroutinecaretheexampleofelectronicpatientreportedoutcomesinukrenalservices AT erciaa participatorycodesignandnormalisationprocesstheorywithstaffandpatientstoimplementdigitalwaysofworkingintoroutinecaretheexampleofelectronicpatientreportedoutcomesinukrenalservices AT caskeyf participatorycodesignandnormalisationprocesstheorywithstaffandpatientstoimplementdigitalwaysofworkingintoroutinecaretheexampleofelectronicpatientreportedoutcomesinukrenalservices AT reesm participatorycodesignandnormalisationprocesstheorywithstaffandpatientstoimplementdigitalwaysofworkingintoroutinecaretheexampleofelectronicpatientreportedoutcomesinukrenalservices AT farringtonk participatorycodesignandnormalisationprocesstheorywithstaffandpatientstoimplementdigitalwaysofworkingintoroutinecaretheexampleofelectronicpatientreportedoutcomesinukrenalservices AT vanderveersn participatorycodesignandnormalisationprocesstheorywithstaffandpatientstoimplementdigitalwaysofworkingintoroutinecaretheexampleofelectronicpatientreportedoutcomesinukrenalservices |