Cargando…
Assessing the risk of performance and detection bias in Cochrane reviews as a joint domain is less accurate compared to two separate domains
BACKGROUND: Initially, the Cochrane risk of bias (RoB) tool had a domain for “blinding of participants, personnel and outcome assessors”. In the 2011 tool, the assessment of blinding was split into two domains: blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) and blinding of outcome assesso...
Autores principales: | Barcot, Ognjen, Boric, Matija, Dosenovic, Svjetlana, Puljak, Livia |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8286598/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34275437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01339-1 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Risk of bias judgments for random sequence generation in Cochrane systematic reviews were frequently not in line with Cochrane Handbook
por: Barcot, Ognjen, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Adequacy of risk of bias assessment in surgical vs non-surgical trials in Cochrane reviews: a methodological study
por: Barcot, Ognjen, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Pain assessment in clinical trials: a narrative review
por: Puljak, Livia, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Cochrane plain language summaries are highly heterogeneous with low adherence to the standards
por: Jelicic Kadic, Antonia, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Efficacy and safety of modified-release paracetamol for acute and chronic pain: a systematic review protocol
por: Margan Koletic, Zeljana, et al.
Publicado: (2019)