Cargando…

In silico molecular docking and in vitro antimicrobial efficacy of phytochemicals against multi-drug-resistant enteroaggregative Escherichia coli and non-typhoidal Salmonella spp.

BACKGROUND: In the wake of emergence of antimicrobial resistance, bioactive phytochemical compounds are proving to be important therapeutic agents. The present study envisaged in silico molecular docking as well as in vitro antimicrobial efficacy screening of identified phytochemical ligands to the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abishad, Padikkamannil, Niveditha, Pollumahanti, Unni, Varsha, Vergis, Jess, Kurkure, Nitin Vasantrao, Chaudhari, Sandeep, Rawool, Deepak Bhiwa, Barbuddhe, Sukhadeo Baliram
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8286599/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34273998
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13099-021-00443-3
_version_ 1783723746309177344
author Abishad, Padikkamannil
Niveditha, Pollumahanti
Unni, Varsha
Vergis, Jess
Kurkure, Nitin Vasantrao
Chaudhari, Sandeep
Rawool, Deepak Bhiwa
Barbuddhe, Sukhadeo Baliram
author_facet Abishad, Padikkamannil
Niveditha, Pollumahanti
Unni, Varsha
Vergis, Jess
Kurkure, Nitin Vasantrao
Chaudhari, Sandeep
Rawool, Deepak Bhiwa
Barbuddhe, Sukhadeo Baliram
author_sort Abishad, Padikkamannil
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the wake of emergence of antimicrobial resistance, bioactive phytochemical compounds are proving to be important therapeutic agents. The present study envisaged in silico molecular docking as well as in vitro antimicrobial efficacy screening of identified phytochemical ligands to the dispersin (aap) and outer membrane osmoporin (OmpC) domains of enteroaggregative Escherichia coli (EAEC) and non-typhoidal Salmonella spp. (NTS), respectively. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The evaluation of drug-likeness, molecular properties, and bioactivity of the identified phytocompounds (thymol, carvacrol, and cinnamaldehyde) was carried out using Swiss ADME, while Protox-II and StopTox servers were used to identify its toxicity. The in silico molecular docking of the phytochemical ligands with the protein motifs of dispersin (PDB ID: 2jvu) and outer membrane osmoporin (PDB ID: 3uu2) were carried out using AutoDock v.4.20. Further, the antimicrobial efficacy of these compounds against multi-drug resistant EAEC and NTS strains was determined by estimating the minimum inhibitory concentrations and minimum bactericidal concentrations. Subsequently, these phytochemicals were subjected to their safety (sheep and human erythrocytic haemolysis) as well as stability (cationic salts, and pH) assays. RESULTS: All the three identified phytochemicals ligands were found to be zero violators of Lipinski’s rule of five and exhibited drug-likeness. The compounds tested were categorized as toxicity class-4 by Protox-II and were found to be non- cardiotoxic by StopTox. The docking studies employing 3D model of dispersin and ompC motifs with the identified phytochemical ligands exhibited good binding affinity. The identified phytochemical compounds were observed to be comparatively stable at different conditions (cationic salts, and pH); however, a concentration-dependent increase in the haemolytic assay was observed against sheep as well as human erythrocytes. CONCLUSIONS: In silico molecular docking studies provided useful insights to understand the interaction of phytochemical ligands with protein motifs of pathogen and should be used routinely before the wet screening of any phytochemicals for their antibacterial, stability, and safety aspects. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13099-021-00443-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8286599
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82865992021-07-19 In silico molecular docking and in vitro antimicrobial efficacy of phytochemicals against multi-drug-resistant enteroaggregative Escherichia coli and non-typhoidal Salmonella spp. Abishad, Padikkamannil Niveditha, Pollumahanti Unni, Varsha Vergis, Jess Kurkure, Nitin Vasantrao Chaudhari, Sandeep Rawool, Deepak Bhiwa Barbuddhe, Sukhadeo Baliram Gut Pathog Research BACKGROUND: In the wake of emergence of antimicrobial resistance, bioactive phytochemical compounds are proving to be important therapeutic agents. The present study envisaged in silico molecular docking as well as in vitro antimicrobial efficacy screening of identified phytochemical ligands to the dispersin (aap) and outer membrane osmoporin (OmpC) domains of enteroaggregative Escherichia coli (EAEC) and non-typhoidal Salmonella spp. (NTS), respectively. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The evaluation of drug-likeness, molecular properties, and bioactivity of the identified phytocompounds (thymol, carvacrol, and cinnamaldehyde) was carried out using Swiss ADME, while Protox-II and StopTox servers were used to identify its toxicity. The in silico molecular docking of the phytochemical ligands with the protein motifs of dispersin (PDB ID: 2jvu) and outer membrane osmoporin (PDB ID: 3uu2) were carried out using AutoDock v.4.20. Further, the antimicrobial efficacy of these compounds against multi-drug resistant EAEC and NTS strains was determined by estimating the minimum inhibitory concentrations and minimum bactericidal concentrations. Subsequently, these phytochemicals were subjected to their safety (sheep and human erythrocytic haemolysis) as well as stability (cationic salts, and pH) assays. RESULTS: All the three identified phytochemicals ligands were found to be zero violators of Lipinski’s rule of five and exhibited drug-likeness. The compounds tested were categorized as toxicity class-4 by Protox-II and were found to be non- cardiotoxic by StopTox. The docking studies employing 3D model of dispersin and ompC motifs with the identified phytochemical ligands exhibited good binding affinity. The identified phytochemical compounds were observed to be comparatively stable at different conditions (cationic salts, and pH); however, a concentration-dependent increase in the haemolytic assay was observed against sheep as well as human erythrocytes. CONCLUSIONS: In silico molecular docking studies provided useful insights to understand the interaction of phytochemical ligands with protein motifs of pathogen and should be used routinely before the wet screening of any phytochemicals for their antibacterial, stability, and safety aspects. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13099-021-00443-3. BioMed Central 2021-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8286599/ /pubmed/34273998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13099-021-00443-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Abishad, Padikkamannil
Niveditha, Pollumahanti
Unni, Varsha
Vergis, Jess
Kurkure, Nitin Vasantrao
Chaudhari, Sandeep
Rawool, Deepak Bhiwa
Barbuddhe, Sukhadeo Baliram
In silico molecular docking and in vitro antimicrobial efficacy of phytochemicals against multi-drug-resistant enteroaggregative Escherichia coli and non-typhoidal Salmonella spp.
title In silico molecular docking and in vitro antimicrobial efficacy of phytochemicals against multi-drug-resistant enteroaggregative Escherichia coli and non-typhoidal Salmonella spp.
title_full In silico molecular docking and in vitro antimicrobial efficacy of phytochemicals against multi-drug-resistant enteroaggregative Escherichia coli and non-typhoidal Salmonella spp.
title_fullStr In silico molecular docking and in vitro antimicrobial efficacy of phytochemicals against multi-drug-resistant enteroaggregative Escherichia coli and non-typhoidal Salmonella spp.
title_full_unstemmed In silico molecular docking and in vitro antimicrobial efficacy of phytochemicals against multi-drug-resistant enteroaggregative Escherichia coli and non-typhoidal Salmonella spp.
title_short In silico molecular docking and in vitro antimicrobial efficacy of phytochemicals against multi-drug-resistant enteroaggregative Escherichia coli and non-typhoidal Salmonella spp.
title_sort in silico molecular docking and in vitro antimicrobial efficacy of phytochemicals against multi-drug-resistant enteroaggregative escherichia coli and non-typhoidal salmonella spp.
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8286599/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34273998
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13099-021-00443-3
work_keys_str_mv AT abishadpadikkamannil insilicomoleculardockingandinvitroantimicrobialefficacyofphytochemicalsagainstmultidrugresistantenteroaggregativeescherichiacoliandnontyphoidalsalmonellaspp
AT nivedithapollumahanti insilicomoleculardockingandinvitroantimicrobialefficacyofphytochemicalsagainstmultidrugresistantenteroaggregativeescherichiacoliandnontyphoidalsalmonellaspp
AT unnivarsha insilicomoleculardockingandinvitroantimicrobialefficacyofphytochemicalsagainstmultidrugresistantenteroaggregativeescherichiacoliandnontyphoidalsalmonellaspp
AT vergisjess insilicomoleculardockingandinvitroantimicrobialefficacyofphytochemicalsagainstmultidrugresistantenteroaggregativeescherichiacoliandnontyphoidalsalmonellaspp
AT kurkurenitinvasantrao insilicomoleculardockingandinvitroantimicrobialefficacyofphytochemicalsagainstmultidrugresistantenteroaggregativeescherichiacoliandnontyphoidalsalmonellaspp
AT chaudharisandeep insilicomoleculardockingandinvitroantimicrobialefficacyofphytochemicalsagainstmultidrugresistantenteroaggregativeescherichiacoliandnontyphoidalsalmonellaspp
AT rawooldeepakbhiwa insilicomoleculardockingandinvitroantimicrobialefficacyofphytochemicalsagainstmultidrugresistantenteroaggregativeescherichiacoliandnontyphoidalsalmonellaspp
AT barbuddhesukhadeobaliram insilicomoleculardockingandinvitroantimicrobialefficacyofphytochemicalsagainstmultidrugresistantenteroaggregativeescherichiacoliandnontyphoidalsalmonellaspp