Cargando…

A systematic review and meta-analysis of nab-paclitaxel mono-chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND: Although various clinical trials and real-life studies have tried to explore the value of nab-paclitaxel mono-chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC), the safety and efficacy of nab-paclitaxel remain unclear which need to be systematically evaluated. METHODS: Electronic searches...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lu, Haili, Zha, Siluo, Zhang, Wei, Wang, Qiang, Jiang, Daozhen, Xu, Xinyun, Zheng, Xiangmin, Qiu, Ming, Shan, Chengxiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8286600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34275458
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08441-z
_version_ 1783723746545106944
author Lu, Haili
Zha, Siluo
Zhang, Wei
Wang, Qiang
Jiang, Daozhen
Xu, Xinyun
Zheng, Xiangmin
Qiu, Ming
Shan, Chengxiang
author_facet Lu, Haili
Zha, Siluo
Zhang, Wei
Wang, Qiang
Jiang, Daozhen
Xu, Xinyun
Zheng, Xiangmin
Qiu, Ming
Shan, Chengxiang
author_sort Lu, Haili
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although various clinical trials and real-life studies have tried to explore the value of nab-paclitaxel mono-chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC), the safety and efficacy of nab-paclitaxel remain unclear which need to be systematically evaluated. METHODS: Electronic searches for prospective clinical trials evaluating nab-paclitaxel monotherapy for MBC were performed. Requisite data were extracted, integrated and analysed from the included studies according to the different study designs using systematic review and meta-analysis. Meta-regression and subgroup analysis were further performed to explore the potential risk factors affecting each individual outcome of interest following nab-paclitaxel monotherapy. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies with 3287 MBC patients were included. A total of 1685 MBC patients received nab-paclitaxel as first-line therapy, 640 patients as further-line therapy, and 962 patients as mixed-line therapy. A total of 1966 MBC patients (60.40%) received nab-paclitaxel weekly, 1190 patients (36.56%) received nab-paclitaxel triweekly and 99 patients (3.04%) received nab-paclitaxel biweekly. The overall incidence rates of all-grade neutropenia, leukopenia, peripheral sensory neuropathy, and fatigue were 52% (95% CI, 38–66%, I(2) = 98.97%), 58% (95% CI, 43–73%, I(2) = 97.72%), 58% (95% CI, 48–68%, I(2) = 97.17%), and 49% (95% CI, 41–56%, I(2) = 94.39%), respectively. The overall response rate (ORR) was 40% (95% CI, 35–45%, I(2) = 98.97%), and the clinical benefit rate (CBR) was 66% (95% CI, 59–73%, I(2) = 98.97%) following nab-paclitaxel monotherapy. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.64 months (95% CI, 6.89–8.40 months, I(2) = 92.3%), and the median overall survival (OS) was 24.51 months (95% CI, 21.25–27.78 months, I(2) = 92.7%). Treatment line, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2(Her-2)-negative status and dosage were found to be sources of heterogeneity among the included studies. According to the meta-regression and subgroup analysis, grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred less frequently in Her-2-negative patients than in the entire population (P = 0.046). Patients who received first-line nab-paclitaxel monotherapy showed a higher ORR (P = 0.006) and longer PFS (P = 0.045). Efficacy outcomes were not affected by the administration schedule. However, within the same schedule, patients appeared to have a superior ORR (P = 0.044) and longer PFS (P = 0.03) with an increasing dosage of nab-paclitaxel administered. CONCLUSIONS: The benefits brought by nab-paclitaxel mono-chemotherapy in the treatment of MBC are considerable while the harm is generally manageable. Further study and validation are needed to figure out the roles which the dosage, schedule and other factors play actually in nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08441-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8286600
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82866002021-07-19 A systematic review and meta-analysis of nab-paclitaxel mono-chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer Lu, Haili Zha, Siluo Zhang, Wei Wang, Qiang Jiang, Daozhen Xu, Xinyun Zheng, Xiangmin Qiu, Ming Shan, Chengxiang BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Although various clinical trials and real-life studies have tried to explore the value of nab-paclitaxel mono-chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC), the safety and efficacy of nab-paclitaxel remain unclear which need to be systematically evaluated. METHODS: Electronic searches for prospective clinical trials evaluating nab-paclitaxel monotherapy for MBC were performed. Requisite data were extracted, integrated and analysed from the included studies according to the different study designs using systematic review and meta-analysis. Meta-regression and subgroup analysis were further performed to explore the potential risk factors affecting each individual outcome of interest following nab-paclitaxel monotherapy. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies with 3287 MBC patients were included. A total of 1685 MBC patients received nab-paclitaxel as first-line therapy, 640 patients as further-line therapy, and 962 patients as mixed-line therapy. A total of 1966 MBC patients (60.40%) received nab-paclitaxel weekly, 1190 patients (36.56%) received nab-paclitaxel triweekly and 99 patients (3.04%) received nab-paclitaxel biweekly. The overall incidence rates of all-grade neutropenia, leukopenia, peripheral sensory neuropathy, and fatigue were 52% (95% CI, 38–66%, I(2) = 98.97%), 58% (95% CI, 43–73%, I(2) = 97.72%), 58% (95% CI, 48–68%, I(2) = 97.17%), and 49% (95% CI, 41–56%, I(2) = 94.39%), respectively. The overall response rate (ORR) was 40% (95% CI, 35–45%, I(2) = 98.97%), and the clinical benefit rate (CBR) was 66% (95% CI, 59–73%, I(2) = 98.97%) following nab-paclitaxel monotherapy. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.64 months (95% CI, 6.89–8.40 months, I(2) = 92.3%), and the median overall survival (OS) was 24.51 months (95% CI, 21.25–27.78 months, I(2) = 92.7%). Treatment line, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2(Her-2)-negative status and dosage were found to be sources of heterogeneity among the included studies. According to the meta-regression and subgroup analysis, grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred less frequently in Her-2-negative patients than in the entire population (P = 0.046). Patients who received first-line nab-paclitaxel monotherapy showed a higher ORR (P = 0.006) and longer PFS (P = 0.045). Efficacy outcomes were not affected by the administration schedule. However, within the same schedule, patients appeared to have a superior ORR (P = 0.044) and longer PFS (P = 0.03) with an increasing dosage of nab-paclitaxel administered. CONCLUSIONS: The benefits brought by nab-paclitaxel mono-chemotherapy in the treatment of MBC are considerable while the harm is generally manageable. Further study and validation are needed to figure out the roles which the dosage, schedule and other factors play actually in nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08441-z. BioMed Central 2021-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8286600/ /pubmed/34275458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08441-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lu, Haili
Zha, Siluo
Zhang, Wei
Wang, Qiang
Jiang, Daozhen
Xu, Xinyun
Zheng, Xiangmin
Qiu, Ming
Shan, Chengxiang
A systematic review and meta-analysis of nab-paclitaxel mono-chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer
title A systematic review and meta-analysis of nab-paclitaxel mono-chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer
title_full A systematic review and meta-analysis of nab-paclitaxel mono-chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer
title_fullStr A systematic review and meta-analysis of nab-paclitaxel mono-chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review and meta-analysis of nab-paclitaxel mono-chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer
title_short A systematic review and meta-analysis of nab-paclitaxel mono-chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer
title_sort systematic review and meta-analysis of nab-paclitaxel mono-chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8286600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34275458
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08441-z
work_keys_str_mv AT luhaili asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofnabpaclitaxelmonochemotherapyformetastaticbreastcancer
AT zhasiluo asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofnabpaclitaxelmonochemotherapyformetastaticbreastcancer
AT zhangwei asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofnabpaclitaxelmonochemotherapyformetastaticbreastcancer
AT wangqiang asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofnabpaclitaxelmonochemotherapyformetastaticbreastcancer
AT jiangdaozhen asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofnabpaclitaxelmonochemotherapyformetastaticbreastcancer
AT xuxinyun asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofnabpaclitaxelmonochemotherapyformetastaticbreastcancer
AT zhengxiangmin asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofnabpaclitaxelmonochemotherapyformetastaticbreastcancer
AT qiuming asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofnabpaclitaxelmonochemotherapyformetastaticbreastcancer
AT shanchengxiang asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofnabpaclitaxelmonochemotherapyformetastaticbreastcancer
AT luhaili systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofnabpaclitaxelmonochemotherapyformetastaticbreastcancer
AT zhasiluo systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofnabpaclitaxelmonochemotherapyformetastaticbreastcancer
AT zhangwei systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofnabpaclitaxelmonochemotherapyformetastaticbreastcancer
AT wangqiang systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofnabpaclitaxelmonochemotherapyformetastaticbreastcancer
AT jiangdaozhen systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofnabpaclitaxelmonochemotherapyformetastaticbreastcancer
AT xuxinyun systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofnabpaclitaxelmonochemotherapyformetastaticbreastcancer
AT zhengxiangmin systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofnabpaclitaxelmonochemotherapyformetastaticbreastcancer
AT qiuming systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofnabpaclitaxelmonochemotherapyformetastaticbreastcancer
AT shanchengxiang systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofnabpaclitaxelmonochemotherapyformetastaticbreastcancer