Cargando…
Brief comments on three existing approaches for managing neonates at risk of early-onset sepsis
BACKGROUND: Growing concerns regarding the adverse effects of antibiotics during the first days of life and the marked reduction in the incidence of early-onset sepsis (EOS) are changing the clinical practice for managing neonates at risk of EOS. Strategies avoiding unnecessary antibiotics while pro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8286612/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34275466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13052-021-01107-3 |
_version_ | 1783723748886577152 |
---|---|
author | Vaccina, E. Luglio, A. Ceccoli, M. Lecis, M. Leone, F. Zini, T. Toni, G. Lugli, L. Lucaccioni, L. Iughetti, L. Berardi, A. |
author_facet | Vaccina, E. Luglio, A. Ceccoli, M. Lecis, M. Leone, F. Zini, T. Toni, G. Lugli, L. Lucaccioni, L. Iughetti, L. Berardi, A. |
author_sort | Vaccina, E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Growing concerns regarding the adverse effects of antibiotics during the first days of life and the marked reduction in the incidence of early-onset sepsis (EOS) are changing the clinical practice for managing neonates at risk of EOS. Strategies avoiding unnecessary antibiotics while promoting mother-infant bonding and breastfeeding deserve to be considered. MAIN BODY: We compare strategies for managing newborns at risk of EOS recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics, which are among the most followed recommendations worldwide. Currently three different approaches are suggested in asymptomatic full-term or late preterm neonates: i) the conventional management, based on standard perinatal risk factors for EOS alone, ii) the neonatal sepsis calculator, a multivariate risk assessment based on individualized, quantitative risk estimates (relying on maternal risk factors for EOS) combined with physical examination findings at birth and in the following hours and iii) an approach entirely based on newborn clinical condition (serial clinical observation) during the first 48 h of life. We discuss advantages and limitations of these approaches, by analyzing studies supporting each strategy. Approximately 40% of infants who develop EOS cannot be identified on the basis of maternal RFs or laboratory tests, therefore close monitoring of the asymptomatic but at-risk infant remains crucial. A key question is to know what proportion of babies with mild, unspecific symptoms at birth can be managed safely without giving antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: Both neonatal sepsis calculator and serial clinical observation may miss cases of EOS, and clinical vigilance for all neonates is essential There is a need to assess which symptoms at birth are more predictive of EOS, and therefore require immediate interventions, or symptoms that can be carefully reevaluated without necessarily treat immediately the neonate with antibiotics. Studies comparing strategies for managing neonates are recommended. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8286612 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82866122021-07-19 Brief comments on three existing approaches for managing neonates at risk of early-onset sepsis Vaccina, E. Luglio, A. Ceccoli, M. Lecis, M. Leone, F. Zini, T. Toni, G. Lugli, L. Lucaccioni, L. Iughetti, L. Berardi, A. Ital J Pediatr Commentary BACKGROUND: Growing concerns regarding the adverse effects of antibiotics during the first days of life and the marked reduction in the incidence of early-onset sepsis (EOS) are changing the clinical practice for managing neonates at risk of EOS. Strategies avoiding unnecessary antibiotics while promoting mother-infant bonding and breastfeeding deserve to be considered. MAIN BODY: We compare strategies for managing newborns at risk of EOS recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics, which are among the most followed recommendations worldwide. Currently three different approaches are suggested in asymptomatic full-term or late preterm neonates: i) the conventional management, based on standard perinatal risk factors for EOS alone, ii) the neonatal sepsis calculator, a multivariate risk assessment based on individualized, quantitative risk estimates (relying on maternal risk factors for EOS) combined with physical examination findings at birth and in the following hours and iii) an approach entirely based on newborn clinical condition (serial clinical observation) during the first 48 h of life. We discuss advantages and limitations of these approaches, by analyzing studies supporting each strategy. Approximately 40% of infants who develop EOS cannot be identified on the basis of maternal RFs or laboratory tests, therefore close monitoring of the asymptomatic but at-risk infant remains crucial. A key question is to know what proportion of babies with mild, unspecific symptoms at birth can be managed safely without giving antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: Both neonatal sepsis calculator and serial clinical observation may miss cases of EOS, and clinical vigilance for all neonates is essential There is a need to assess which symptoms at birth are more predictive of EOS, and therefore require immediate interventions, or symptoms that can be carefully reevaluated without necessarily treat immediately the neonate with antibiotics. Studies comparing strategies for managing neonates are recommended. BioMed Central 2021-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8286612/ /pubmed/34275466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13052-021-01107-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Vaccina, E. Luglio, A. Ceccoli, M. Lecis, M. Leone, F. Zini, T. Toni, G. Lugli, L. Lucaccioni, L. Iughetti, L. Berardi, A. Brief comments on three existing approaches for managing neonates at risk of early-onset sepsis |
title | Brief comments on three existing approaches for managing neonates at risk of early-onset sepsis |
title_full | Brief comments on three existing approaches for managing neonates at risk of early-onset sepsis |
title_fullStr | Brief comments on three existing approaches for managing neonates at risk of early-onset sepsis |
title_full_unstemmed | Brief comments on three existing approaches for managing neonates at risk of early-onset sepsis |
title_short | Brief comments on three existing approaches for managing neonates at risk of early-onset sepsis |
title_sort | brief comments on three existing approaches for managing neonates at risk of early-onset sepsis |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8286612/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34275466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13052-021-01107-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vaccinae briefcommentsonthreeexistingapproachesformanagingneonatesatriskofearlyonsetsepsis AT luglioa briefcommentsonthreeexistingapproachesformanagingneonatesatriskofearlyonsetsepsis AT ceccolim briefcommentsonthreeexistingapproachesformanagingneonatesatriskofearlyonsetsepsis AT lecism briefcommentsonthreeexistingapproachesformanagingneonatesatriskofearlyonsetsepsis AT leonef briefcommentsonthreeexistingapproachesformanagingneonatesatriskofearlyonsetsepsis AT zinit briefcommentsonthreeexistingapproachesformanagingneonatesatriskofearlyonsetsepsis AT tonig briefcommentsonthreeexistingapproachesformanagingneonatesatriskofearlyonsetsepsis AT luglil briefcommentsonthreeexistingapproachesformanagingneonatesatriskofearlyonsetsepsis AT lucaccionil briefcommentsonthreeexistingapproachesformanagingneonatesatriskofearlyonsetsepsis AT iughettil briefcommentsonthreeexistingapproachesformanagingneonatesatriskofearlyonsetsepsis AT berardia briefcommentsonthreeexistingapproachesformanagingneonatesatriskofearlyonsetsepsis |