Cargando…

Realist evaluation of Schwartz rounds® for enhancing the delivery of compassionate healthcare: understanding how they work, for whom, and in what contexts

BACKGROUND: Healthcare work is known to be stressful and challenging, and there are recognised links between the psychological health of staff and high-quality patient care. Schwartz Center Rounds® (Rounds) were developed to support healthcare staff to re-connect with their values through peer refle...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Maben, J., Taylor, C., Reynolds, E., McCarthy, I., Leamy, M.
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2021
Materias:	Research Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8286624/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34275468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06483-4

Ejemplares similares

The origins and implementation of an intervention to support healthcare staff to deliver compassionate care: exploring fidelity and adaptation in the transfer of Schwartz Center Rounds® from the United States to the United Kingdom
por: Leamy, Mary, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

‘We needed to talk about it’: The experience of sharing the emotional impact of health care work as a panellist in Schwartz Center Rounds® in the UK
por: McCarthy, Imelda, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Can Schwartz Center Rounds support healthcare staff with emotional challenges at work, and how do they compare with other interventions aimed at providing similar support? A systematic review and scoping reviews
por: Taylor, Cath, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Exploring the adoption of Schwartz Center Rounds as an organisational innovation to improve staff well-being in England, 2009–2015
por: Robert, Glenn, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Measuring compassionate healthcare with the 12-item Schwartz Center Compassionate Care Scale
por: Rodriguez, Ana Maria, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Realist synthesis of intentional rounding in hospital wards: exploring the evidence of what works, for whom, in what circumstances and why
por: Sims, Sarah, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Correction: Measuring compassionate healthcare with the 12-item Schwartz Center Compassionate Care Scale
por: Rodriguez, Ana Maria, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

The delivery of compassionate nursing care in a tick-box culture: Qualitative perspectives from a realist evaluation of intentional rounding
por: Sims, Sarah, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Support for compassionate care: Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of Schwartz Center Rounds in an acute general hospital
por: Chadwick, Raymond J, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Schwartz rounds for healthcare personnel in coping with COVID-19 pandemic
por: Saniasiaya, Jeyasakthy, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

What aspects of intentional rounding work in hospital wards, for whom and in what circumstances? A realist evaluation protocol
por: Harris, Ruth, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Validity and reliability of the Amharic version of the Schwartz Center Compassionate Care Scale
por: Zeray, Merkeb, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

How, for whom, and in what contexts will artificial intelligence be adopted in pathology? A realist interview study
por: King, Henry, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Interventions to address unprofessional behaviours between staff in acute care: what works for whom and why? A realist review
por: Maben, Jill, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Effectiveness of a group intervention to reduce the psychological distress of healthcare staff: a pre-post quasi-experimental evaluation
por: Dawson, Jeremy, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Realist Evaluation of Autism ServiCe Delivery (RE-ASCeD): which diagnostic pathways work best, for whom and in what context? Protocol for a rapid realist review
por: Abrahamson, Vanessa, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Value of Schwartz Rounds in promoting the emotional well-being of healthcare workers: a qualitative study
por: Ng, Lillian, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

What works for whom in compassion training programs offered to practicing healthcare providers: a realist review
por: Sinclair, Shane, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Realist evaluation of Autism ServiCe Delivery (RE-ASCeD): which diagnostic pathways work best, for whom and in what context? Findings from a rapid realist review
por: Abrahamson, Vanessa, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Schwartz Centre Rounds: a new initiative in the undergraduate curriculum—what do medical students think?
por: Gishen, Faye, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

What approaches to social prescribing work, for whom, and in what circumstances? A realist review
por: Husk, Kerryn, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

What factors are important to whom in what context, when adults are prescribed hearing aids for hearing loss? A realist review protocol
por: Broome, Emma, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The influence of contextual factors on healthcare quality improvement initiatives: what works, for whom and in what setting? Protocol for a realist review
por: Coles, Emma, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

What works for whom in pharmacist-led smoking cessation support: realist review
por: Greenhalgh, Trisha, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Synthesis of the Evidence on What Works for Whom in Telemental Health: Rapid Realist Review
por: Schlief, Merle, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Understanding for whom, under what conditions, and how group-based physical activity interventions are successful: a realist review
por: Harden, Samantha M., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Moving Forward With Integrated Care: The Use of Realist Approaches to Understand What Works, How, for Whom and Under Which Circumstances
por: Peytremann-Bridevaux, Isabelle, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Internet-based medical education: a realist review of what works, for whom and in what circumstances
por: Wong, Geoff, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

What works for whom in the management of diabetes in people living with dementia: a realist review
por: Bunn, Frances, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Feedback on clinical team performance: how does it work, in what contexts, for whom, and for what changes? A critical realist qualitative multiple case study
por: Rapin, Joachim, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Understanding for whom, why and in what circumstances payment for performance works in low and middle income countries: protocol for a realist review
por: Borghi, Josephine, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

What approaches to social prescribing work, for whom, and in what circumstances? A protocol for a realist review
por: Husk, Kerryn, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Medical Student Schwartz Rounds: A Powerful Medium for Medical Student Reflective Practice
por: Gleeson, David, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Schwartz Rounds for Staff in an Australian Tertiary Hospital: Protocol for a Pilot Uncontrolled Trial
por: Ewais, Tatjana, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

A realist review of infant feeding counselling to increase exclusive breastfeeding by HIV-positive women in sub Saharan-Africa: what works for whom and in what contexts
por: Nyoni, Simangaliso, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Understanding work participation among employees with common mental disorders: What works, for whom, under what circumstances and how? A systematic realist review protocol
por: van Hees, Suzanne G.M., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

A realist review of shared medical appointments: How, for whom, and under what circumstances do they work?
por: Kirsh, Susan R., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Schwartz–Jampel syndrome
por: Chandra, Sadanandavalli Retnaswami, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Remembering Stephen Schwartz
por: Gibbons, Gary H.
Publicado: (2020)

Early introduction of the multi-disciplinary team through student Schwartz Rounds: a mixed methodology study
por: Abnett, Harry, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_k0rdige4fjoqb2qi2re71n73p2