Cargando…
Upper Esophageal Sphincter Compression Device as an Adjunct to Proton Pump Inhibition for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux
BACKGROUND: The Reflux Band, an external upper esophageal sphincter (UES) compression device, reduces esophago-pharyngeal reflux events. This study aimed to assess device efficacy as an adjunct to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). METHODS: This two-...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8286644/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34275061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10620-021-07172-2 |
_version_ | 1783723754428301312 |
---|---|
author | Yadlapati, Rena Pandolfino, John E. Greytak, Madeline Cahoon, Jonathon Clarke, Mary Clary, Matthew Fink, Daniel Menard-Katcher, Paul Vahabzadeh-Hagh, Andrew M. Weissbrod, Philip Gupta, Samir Kaizer, Alexander Wani, Sachin |
author_facet | Yadlapati, Rena Pandolfino, John E. Greytak, Madeline Cahoon, Jonathon Clarke, Mary Clary, Matthew Fink, Daniel Menard-Katcher, Paul Vahabzadeh-Hagh, Andrew M. Weissbrod, Philip Gupta, Samir Kaizer, Alexander Wani, Sachin |
author_sort | Yadlapati, Rena |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Reflux Band, an external upper esophageal sphincter (UES) compression device, reduces esophago-pharyngeal reflux events. This study aimed to assess device efficacy as an adjunct to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). METHODS: This two-phase prospective clinical trial enrolled adults with at least 8 weeks of laryngeal symptoms (sore throat, throat clearing, dysphonia) not using PPI therapy at two tertiary care centers over 26 months. Participants used double dose PPI for 4 weeks in Phase 1 and the external UES compression device nightly along with PPI for 4 weeks in Phase 2. Questionnaire scores and salivary pepsin concentration were measured throughout the study. The primary endpoint of symptom response was defined as reflux symptom index (RSI) score ≤ 13 and/or > 50% reduction in RSI. RESULTS: Thirty-one participants completed the study: 52% male, mean age 47.9 years (SD 14.0), and mean body mass index (BMI) 26.2 kg/m(2) (5.1). Primary endpoint was met in 11 (35%) participants after Phase 1 (PPI alone) and 17 (55%) after Phase 2 (Device + PPI). Compared to baseline, mean RSI score (24.1 (10.9)) decreased at end of Phase 1 (PPI alone) (21.9 (9.7); p = 0.06) and significantly decreased at end of Phase 2 (Device + PPI) (15.5 (10.3); p < 0.01). Compared to non-responders, responders to Device + PPI had a significantly lower BMI (p = 0.02) and higher salivary pepsin concentration (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: This clinical trial highlights the potential efficacy of the external UES compression device (Reflux Band) as an adjunct to PPI for patients with LPR (ClinicalTrials.Gov NCT03619811). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10620-021-07172-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8286644 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82866442021-07-19 Upper Esophageal Sphincter Compression Device as an Adjunct to Proton Pump Inhibition for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Yadlapati, Rena Pandolfino, John E. Greytak, Madeline Cahoon, Jonathon Clarke, Mary Clary, Matthew Fink, Daniel Menard-Katcher, Paul Vahabzadeh-Hagh, Andrew M. Weissbrod, Philip Gupta, Samir Kaizer, Alexander Wani, Sachin Dig Dis Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: The Reflux Band, an external upper esophageal sphincter (UES) compression device, reduces esophago-pharyngeal reflux events. This study aimed to assess device efficacy as an adjunct to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). METHODS: This two-phase prospective clinical trial enrolled adults with at least 8 weeks of laryngeal symptoms (sore throat, throat clearing, dysphonia) not using PPI therapy at two tertiary care centers over 26 months. Participants used double dose PPI for 4 weeks in Phase 1 and the external UES compression device nightly along with PPI for 4 weeks in Phase 2. Questionnaire scores and salivary pepsin concentration were measured throughout the study. The primary endpoint of symptom response was defined as reflux symptom index (RSI) score ≤ 13 and/or > 50% reduction in RSI. RESULTS: Thirty-one participants completed the study: 52% male, mean age 47.9 years (SD 14.0), and mean body mass index (BMI) 26.2 kg/m(2) (5.1). Primary endpoint was met in 11 (35%) participants after Phase 1 (PPI alone) and 17 (55%) after Phase 2 (Device + PPI). Compared to baseline, mean RSI score (24.1 (10.9)) decreased at end of Phase 1 (PPI alone) (21.9 (9.7); p = 0.06) and significantly decreased at end of Phase 2 (Device + PPI) (15.5 (10.3); p < 0.01). Compared to non-responders, responders to Device + PPI had a significantly lower BMI (p = 0.02) and higher salivary pepsin concentration (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: This clinical trial highlights the potential efficacy of the external UES compression device (Reflux Band) as an adjunct to PPI for patients with LPR (ClinicalTrials.Gov NCT03619811). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10620-021-07172-2. Springer US 2021-07-18 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8286644/ /pubmed/34275061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10620-021-07172-2 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Yadlapati, Rena Pandolfino, John E. Greytak, Madeline Cahoon, Jonathon Clarke, Mary Clary, Matthew Fink, Daniel Menard-Katcher, Paul Vahabzadeh-Hagh, Andrew M. Weissbrod, Philip Gupta, Samir Kaizer, Alexander Wani, Sachin Upper Esophageal Sphincter Compression Device as an Adjunct to Proton Pump Inhibition for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux |
title | Upper Esophageal Sphincter Compression Device as an Adjunct to Proton Pump Inhibition for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux |
title_full | Upper Esophageal Sphincter Compression Device as an Adjunct to Proton Pump Inhibition for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux |
title_fullStr | Upper Esophageal Sphincter Compression Device as an Adjunct to Proton Pump Inhibition for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux |
title_full_unstemmed | Upper Esophageal Sphincter Compression Device as an Adjunct to Proton Pump Inhibition for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux |
title_short | Upper Esophageal Sphincter Compression Device as an Adjunct to Proton Pump Inhibition for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux |
title_sort | upper esophageal sphincter compression device as an adjunct to proton pump inhibition for laryngopharyngeal reflux |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8286644/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34275061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10620-021-07172-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yadlapatirena upperesophagealsphinctercompressiondeviceasanadjuncttoprotonpumpinhibitionforlaryngopharyngealreflux AT pandolfinojohne upperesophagealsphinctercompressiondeviceasanadjuncttoprotonpumpinhibitionforlaryngopharyngealreflux AT greytakmadeline upperesophagealsphinctercompressiondeviceasanadjuncttoprotonpumpinhibitionforlaryngopharyngealreflux AT cahoonjonathon upperesophagealsphinctercompressiondeviceasanadjuncttoprotonpumpinhibitionforlaryngopharyngealreflux AT clarkemary upperesophagealsphinctercompressiondeviceasanadjuncttoprotonpumpinhibitionforlaryngopharyngealreflux AT clarymatthew upperesophagealsphinctercompressiondeviceasanadjuncttoprotonpumpinhibitionforlaryngopharyngealreflux AT finkdaniel upperesophagealsphinctercompressiondeviceasanadjuncttoprotonpumpinhibitionforlaryngopharyngealreflux AT menardkatcherpaul upperesophagealsphinctercompressiondeviceasanadjuncttoprotonpumpinhibitionforlaryngopharyngealreflux AT vahabzadehhaghandrewm upperesophagealsphinctercompressiondeviceasanadjuncttoprotonpumpinhibitionforlaryngopharyngealreflux AT weissbrodphilip upperesophagealsphinctercompressiondeviceasanadjuncttoprotonpumpinhibitionforlaryngopharyngealreflux AT guptasamir upperesophagealsphinctercompressiondeviceasanadjuncttoprotonpumpinhibitionforlaryngopharyngealreflux AT kaizeralexander upperesophagealsphinctercompressiondeviceasanadjuncttoprotonpumpinhibitionforlaryngopharyngealreflux AT wanisachin upperesophagealsphinctercompressiondeviceasanadjuncttoprotonpumpinhibitionforlaryngopharyngealreflux |