Cargando…

Evaluation of Intraocular Lens Rotational Stability in a Multicenter Clinical Trial

PURPOSE: To evaluate the postoperative rotational stability of two prototype intraocular lens (IOL) designs (subsequently termed version 1 and version 2). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective, multicenter, randomized, paired-eye, 6-month study evaluated the version 1 and version 2 IOLs. Results were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vukich, John A, Ang, Robert E, Straker, Benjamin J K, Janakiraman, Devi Priya, Smith, Pamela J, Batlle, Juan F, Waltz, Kevin L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8286729/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34285467
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S309214
_version_ 1783723773977952256
author Vukich, John A
Ang, Robert E
Straker, Benjamin J K
Janakiraman, Devi Priya
Smith, Pamela J
Batlle, Juan F
Waltz, Kevin L
author_facet Vukich, John A
Ang, Robert E
Straker, Benjamin J K
Janakiraman, Devi Priya
Smith, Pamela J
Batlle, Juan F
Waltz, Kevin L
author_sort Vukich, John A
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the postoperative rotational stability of two prototype intraocular lens (IOL) designs (subsequently termed version 1 and version 2). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective, multicenter, randomized, paired-eye, 6-month study evaluated the version 1 and version 2 IOLs. Results were compared with a control IOL (TECNIS(®) toric 1-piece monofocal IOL) evaluated in a separate, similarly designed study. Participants aged ≥22 years and scheduled to undergo bilateral cataract extraction were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive the version 1 or version 2 IOL in the first operative eye; the alternate test IOL was then implanted in the second operative eye. RESULTS: Mean absolute IOL rotation at postoperative week 1 was the primary effectiveness end point. Additional end points included the percentage of eyes with postoperative IOL rotation >5°/>10°, direction of lens rotation, surgeon-reported ease of IOL handling during implantation, and safety. At postoperative week 1, mean (±standard deviation) absolute IOL rotation was significantly lower for both version 1 and version 2 versus control (0.88° [±0.94] and 0.71° [±0.69] vs 2.24° [±3.21], respectively; both P < 0.001). For both study lenses, absolute rotation was <5° for all eyes at postoperative week 1, and no cases of rotation >10° were observed at any postoperative time point. From postoperative week 1 onward, version 2 had a statistically significant clockwise bias in the direction of rotation (P = 0.03); similar findings were observed for version 1. Surgeons reported acceptable ease of IOL handling during implantation for both version 1 and version 2. No device-related adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: Both the version 1 and version 2 IOLs, each with frosted, squared haptics, demonstrated improved postoperative rotational stability compared with a control lens without frosted haptics. Because version 2 had the same overall geometry as the current TECNIS toric IOL, this design was selected for commercialization. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00015287.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8286729
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82867292021-07-19 Evaluation of Intraocular Lens Rotational Stability in a Multicenter Clinical Trial Vukich, John A Ang, Robert E Straker, Benjamin J K Janakiraman, Devi Priya Smith, Pamela J Batlle, Juan F Waltz, Kevin L Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: To evaluate the postoperative rotational stability of two prototype intraocular lens (IOL) designs (subsequently termed version 1 and version 2). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective, multicenter, randomized, paired-eye, 6-month study evaluated the version 1 and version 2 IOLs. Results were compared with a control IOL (TECNIS(®) toric 1-piece monofocal IOL) evaluated in a separate, similarly designed study. Participants aged ≥22 years and scheduled to undergo bilateral cataract extraction were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive the version 1 or version 2 IOL in the first operative eye; the alternate test IOL was then implanted in the second operative eye. RESULTS: Mean absolute IOL rotation at postoperative week 1 was the primary effectiveness end point. Additional end points included the percentage of eyes with postoperative IOL rotation >5°/>10°, direction of lens rotation, surgeon-reported ease of IOL handling during implantation, and safety. At postoperative week 1, mean (±standard deviation) absolute IOL rotation was significantly lower for both version 1 and version 2 versus control (0.88° [±0.94] and 0.71° [±0.69] vs 2.24° [±3.21], respectively; both P < 0.001). For both study lenses, absolute rotation was <5° for all eyes at postoperative week 1, and no cases of rotation >10° were observed at any postoperative time point. From postoperative week 1 onward, version 2 had a statistically significant clockwise bias in the direction of rotation (P = 0.03); similar findings were observed for version 1. Surgeons reported acceptable ease of IOL handling during implantation for both version 1 and version 2. No device-related adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: Both the version 1 and version 2 IOLs, each with frosted, squared haptics, demonstrated improved postoperative rotational stability compared with a control lens without frosted haptics. Because version 2 had the same overall geometry as the current TECNIS toric IOL, this design was selected for commercialization. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00015287. Dove 2021-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8286729/ /pubmed/34285467 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S309214 Text en © 2021 Vukich et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Vukich, John A
Ang, Robert E
Straker, Benjamin J K
Janakiraman, Devi Priya
Smith, Pamela J
Batlle, Juan F
Waltz, Kevin L
Evaluation of Intraocular Lens Rotational Stability in a Multicenter Clinical Trial
title Evaluation of Intraocular Lens Rotational Stability in a Multicenter Clinical Trial
title_full Evaluation of Intraocular Lens Rotational Stability in a Multicenter Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Evaluation of Intraocular Lens Rotational Stability in a Multicenter Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Intraocular Lens Rotational Stability in a Multicenter Clinical Trial
title_short Evaluation of Intraocular Lens Rotational Stability in a Multicenter Clinical Trial
title_sort evaluation of intraocular lens rotational stability in a multicenter clinical trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8286729/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34285467
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S309214
work_keys_str_mv AT vukichjohna evaluationofintraocularlensrotationalstabilityinamulticenterclinicaltrial
AT angroberte evaluationofintraocularlensrotationalstabilityinamulticenterclinicaltrial
AT strakerbenjaminjk evaluationofintraocularlensrotationalstabilityinamulticenterclinicaltrial
AT janakiramandevipriya evaluationofintraocularlensrotationalstabilityinamulticenterclinicaltrial
AT smithpamelaj evaluationofintraocularlensrotationalstabilityinamulticenterclinicaltrial
AT batllejuanf evaluationofintraocularlensrotationalstabilityinamulticenterclinicaltrial
AT waltzkevinl evaluationofintraocularlensrotationalstabilityinamulticenterclinicaltrial