Cargando…

Current trend in treatment of glioblastoma in Japan: a national survey using the diagnostic procedure combination database (J-ASPECT study-glioblastoma)

BACKGROUND: In the treatment for glioblastoma (GBM), treatment modalities, such as bevacizumab (BEV) and carmustine wafers implants have been approved in Japan since 2013. However, it is unclear whether such a trend in treatment complexity can accelerate treatment centralization. The aim of this stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Funakoshi, Yusuke, Hata, Nobuhiro, Kuga, Daisuke, Hatae, Ryusuke, Sangatsuda, Yuhei, Fujioka, Yutaka, Takigawa, Kosuke, Yoshimoto, Koji, Mizoguchi, Masahiro, Iihara, Koji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Singapore 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8286941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33974184
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10147-021-01929-5
_version_ 1783723816769290240
author Funakoshi, Yusuke
Hata, Nobuhiro
Kuga, Daisuke
Hatae, Ryusuke
Sangatsuda, Yuhei
Fujioka, Yutaka
Takigawa, Kosuke
Yoshimoto, Koji
Mizoguchi, Masahiro
Iihara, Koji
author_facet Funakoshi, Yusuke
Hata, Nobuhiro
Kuga, Daisuke
Hatae, Ryusuke
Sangatsuda, Yuhei
Fujioka, Yutaka
Takigawa, Kosuke
Yoshimoto, Koji
Mizoguchi, Masahiro
Iihara, Koji
author_sort Funakoshi, Yusuke
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the treatment for glioblastoma (GBM), treatment modalities, such as bevacizumab (BEV) and carmustine wafers implants have been approved in Japan since 2013. However, it is unclear whether such a trend in treatment complexity can accelerate treatment centralization. The aim of this study was to reveal the current trend in the treatment of GBM in Japan. METHODS: We used diagnostic procedure combination (DPC) database to analyze the data of 1,774 patients from 305 institutions between April 2016 and March 2019. To analyze the situations associated with first-line BEV use during concurrent TMZ (temozolomide)-radiotherapy, we compared TMZ alone and TMZ–BEV groups. RESULTS: Of the 1,774 patients with GBM, tumor removal by craniotomy was performed in 1,572 (88.6%) patients, and stereotactic biopsy was performed in 156 (8.8%) patients. A total of 1,229 (69.3%) patients underwent radiotherapy, and 1,287 (72.5%) patients underwent chemotherapy. TMZ alone was administered to 878 (68.2%) and TMZ combined with BEV in 381 (29.6%) patients. In the TMZ–BEV group, as compared to the TMZ-alone group, the rate of discharge to home was significantly lower (P = 0.0044), and the rate of stereotactic biopsy was significantly higher (P < 0.0001). No significant difference was observed in the distribution of patients between the TMZ alone and TMZ–BEV groups depending on the scale of institution (P = 0.1240). CONCLUSION: First-line BEV administration seems to be selected properly regardless of the institutional scale. This Japan-wide study of GBM treatment revealed that high level and newly introduced treatments have been steadily generalized in Japanese institutions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8286941
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Singapore
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82869412021-07-20 Current trend in treatment of glioblastoma in Japan: a national survey using the diagnostic procedure combination database (J-ASPECT study-glioblastoma) Funakoshi, Yusuke Hata, Nobuhiro Kuga, Daisuke Hatae, Ryusuke Sangatsuda, Yuhei Fujioka, Yutaka Takigawa, Kosuke Yoshimoto, Koji Mizoguchi, Masahiro Iihara, Koji Int J Clin Oncol Original Article BACKGROUND: In the treatment for glioblastoma (GBM), treatment modalities, such as bevacizumab (BEV) and carmustine wafers implants have been approved in Japan since 2013. However, it is unclear whether such a trend in treatment complexity can accelerate treatment centralization. The aim of this study was to reveal the current trend in the treatment of GBM in Japan. METHODS: We used diagnostic procedure combination (DPC) database to analyze the data of 1,774 patients from 305 institutions between April 2016 and March 2019. To analyze the situations associated with first-line BEV use during concurrent TMZ (temozolomide)-radiotherapy, we compared TMZ alone and TMZ–BEV groups. RESULTS: Of the 1,774 patients with GBM, tumor removal by craniotomy was performed in 1,572 (88.6%) patients, and stereotactic biopsy was performed in 156 (8.8%) patients. A total of 1,229 (69.3%) patients underwent radiotherapy, and 1,287 (72.5%) patients underwent chemotherapy. TMZ alone was administered to 878 (68.2%) and TMZ combined with BEV in 381 (29.6%) patients. In the TMZ–BEV group, as compared to the TMZ-alone group, the rate of discharge to home was significantly lower (P = 0.0044), and the rate of stereotactic biopsy was significantly higher (P < 0.0001). No significant difference was observed in the distribution of patients between the TMZ alone and TMZ–BEV groups depending on the scale of institution (P = 0.1240). CONCLUSION: First-line BEV administration seems to be selected properly regardless of the institutional scale. This Japan-wide study of GBM treatment revealed that high level and newly introduced treatments have been steadily generalized in Japanese institutions. Springer Singapore 2021-05-11 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8286941/ /pubmed/33974184 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10147-021-01929-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Funakoshi, Yusuke
Hata, Nobuhiro
Kuga, Daisuke
Hatae, Ryusuke
Sangatsuda, Yuhei
Fujioka, Yutaka
Takigawa, Kosuke
Yoshimoto, Koji
Mizoguchi, Masahiro
Iihara, Koji
Current trend in treatment of glioblastoma in Japan: a national survey using the diagnostic procedure combination database (J-ASPECT study-glioblastoma)
title Current trend in treatment of glioblastoma in Japan: a national survey using the diagnostic procedure combination database (J-ASPECT study-glioblastoma)
title_full Current trend in treatment of glioblastoma in Japan: a national survey using the diagnostic procedure combination database (J-ASPECT study-glioblastoma)
title_fullStr Current trend in treatment of glioblastoma in Japan: a national survey using the diagnostic procedure combination database (J-ASPECT study-glioblastoma)
title_full_unstemmed Current trend in treatment of glioblastoma in Japan: a national survey using the diagnostic procedure combination database (J-ASPECT study-glioblastoma)
title_short Current trend in treatment of glioblastoma in Japan: a national survey using the diagnostic procedure combination database (J-ASPECT study-glioblastoma)
title_sort current trend in treatment of glioblastoma in japan: a national survey using the diagnostic procedure combination database (j-aspect study-glioblastoma)
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8286941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33974184
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10147-021-01929-5
work_keys_str_mv AT funakoshiyusuke currenttrendintreatmentofglioblastomainjapananationalsurveyusingthediagnosticprocedurecombinationdatabasejaspectstudyglioblastoma
AT hatanobuhiro currenttrendintreatmentofglioblastomainjapananationalsurveyusingthediagnosticprocedurecombinationdatabasejaspectstudyglioblastoma
AT kugadaisuke currenttrendintreatmentofglioblastomainjapananationalsurveyusingthediagnosticprocedurecombinationdatabasejaspectstudyglioblastoma
AT hataeryusuke currenttrendintreatmentofglioblastomainjapananationalsurveyusingthediagnosticprocedurecombinationdatabasejaspectstudyglioblastoma
AT sangatsudayuhei currenttrendintreatmentofglioblastomainjapananationalsurveyusingthediagnosticprocedurecombinationdatabasejaspectstudyglioblastoma
AT fujiokayutaka currenttrendintreatmentofglioblastomainjapananationalsurveyusingthediagnosticprocedurecombinationdatabasejaspectstudyglioblastoma
AT takigawakosuke currenttrendintreatmentofglioblastomainjapananationalsurveyusingthediagnosticprocedurecombinationdatabasejaspectstudyglioblastoma
AT yoshimotokoji currenttrendintreatmentofglioblastomainjapananationalsurveyusingthediagnosticprocedurecombinationdatabasejaspectstudyglioblastoma
AT mizoguchimasahiro currenttrendintreatmentofglioblastomainjapananationalsurveyusingthediagnosticprocedurecombinationdatabasejaspectstudyglioblastoma
AT iiharakoji currenttrendintreatmentofglioblastomainjapananationalsurveyusingthediagnosticprocedurecombinationdatabasejaspectstudyglioblastoma