Cargando…

Comparing the effect of positioning on cerebral autoregulation during radical prostatectomy: a prospective observational study

PURPOSE: Surgery in the prolonged extreme Trendelenburg position may lead to elevated intracranial pressure and compromise cerebral hemodynamic regulation. We hypothesized that robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with head-down tilt causes impairment of cerebral autoregulation compared with open re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beck, Stefanie, Ragab, Haissam, Hoop, Dennis, Meßner-Schmitt, Aurélie, Rademacher, Cornelius, Kahl, Ursula, von Breunig, Franziska, Haese, Alexander, Graefen, Markus, Zöllner, Christian, Fischer, Marlene
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8286946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32564173
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10877-020-00549-0
_version_ 1783723817711960064
author Beck, Stefanie
Ragab, Haissam
Hoop, Dennis
Meßner-Schmitt, Aurélie
Rademacher, Cornelius
Kahl, Ursula
von Breunig, Franziska
Haese, Alexander
Graefen, Markus
Zöllner, Christian
Fischer, Marlene
author_facet Beck, Stefanie
Ragab, Haissam
Hoop, Dennis
Meßner-Schmitt, Aurélie
Rademacher, Cornelius
Kahl, Ursula
von Breunig, Franziska
Haese, Alexander
Graefen, Markus
Zöllner, Christian
Fischer, Marlene
author_sort Beck, Stefanie
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Surgery in the prolonged extreme Trendelenburg position may lead to elevated intracranial pressure and compromise cerebral hemodynamic regulation. We hypothesized that robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with head-down tilt causes impairment of cerebral autoregulation compared with open retropubic radical prostatectomy in the supine position. METHODS: Patients scheduled for elective radical prostatectomy were included at a tertiary care prostate cancer clinic. Continuous monitoring of the cerebral autoregulation was performed using the correlation method. Based on measurements of cerebral oxygenation with near-infrared spectroscopy and invasive mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), a moving correlation coefficient was calculated to obtain the cerebral oxygenation index as an indicator of cerebral autoregulation. Cerebral autoregulation was measured continuously from induction until recovery from anesthesia. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in cerebral autoregulation between robot-assisted and open retropubic radical prostatectomy during induction (p = 0.089), intraoperatively (p = 0.162), and during recovery from anesthesia (p = 0.620). Age (B = 0.311 [95% CI 0.039; 0.583], p = 0.025) and a higher difference between baseline MAP and intraoperative MAP (B = 0.200 [95% CI 0.073; 0.327], p = 0.002) were associated with impaired cerebral autoregulation, whereas surgical technique was not (B = 3.339 [95% CI  1.275; 7.952], p = 0.155). CONCLUSION: Compared with open radical prostatectomy in the supine position, robot-assisted surgery in the extreme Trendelenburg position with capnoperitoneum did not lead to an impairment of cerebral autoregulation during the perioperative period in our study population. Trial registration number: DRKS00010014, date of registration: 21.03.2016, retrospectively registered. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10877-020-00549-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8286946
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82869462021-07-20 Comparing the effect of positioning on cerebral autoregulation during radical prostatectomy: a prospective observational study Beck, Stefanie Ragab, Haissam Hoop, Dennis Meßner-Schmitt, Aurélie Rademacher, Cornelius Kahl, Ursula von Breunig, Franziska Haese, Alexander Graefen, Markus Zöllner, Christian Fischer, Marlene J Clin Monit Comput Original Research PURPOSE: Surgery in the prolonged extreme Trendelenburg position may lead to elevated intracranial pressure and compromise cerebral hemodynamic regulation. We hypothesized that robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with head-down tilt causes impairment of cerebral autoregulation compared with open retropubic radical prostatectomy in the supine position. METHODS: Patients scheduled for elective radical prostatectomy were included at a tertiary care prostate cancer clinic. Continuous monitoring of the cerebral autoregulation was performed using the correlation method. Based on measurements of cerebral oxygenation with near-infrared spectroscopy and invasive mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), a moving correlation coefficient was calculated to obtain the cerebral oxygenation index as an indicator of cerebral autoregulation. Cerebral autoregulation was measured continuously from induction until recovery from anesthesia. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in cerebral autoregulation between robot-assisted and open retropubic radical prostatectomy during induction (p = 0.089), intraoperatively (p = 0.162), and during recovery from anesthesia (p = 0.620). Age (B = 0.311 [95% CI 0.039; 0.583], p = 0.025) and a higher difference between baseline MAP and intraoperative MAP (B = 0.200 [95% CI 0.073; 0.327], p = 0.002) were associated with impaired cerebral autoregulation, whereas surgical technique was not (B = 3.339 [95% CI  1.275; 7.952], p = 0.155). CONCLUSION: Compared with open radical prostatectomy in the supine position, robot-assisted surgery in the extreme Trendelenburg position with capnoperitoneum did not lead to an impairment of cerebral autoregulation during the perioperative period in our study population. Trial registration number: DRKS00010014, date of registration: 21.03.2016, retrospectively registered. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10877-020-00549-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Netherlands 2020-06-20 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8286946/ /pubmed/32564173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10877-020-00549-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Beck, Stefanie
Ragab, Haissam
Hoop, Dennis
Meßner-Schmitt, Aurélie
Rademacher, Cornelius
Kahl, Ursula
von Breunig, Franziska
Haese, Alexander
Graefen, Markus
Zöllner, Christian
Fischer, Marlene
Comparing the effect of positioning on cerebral autoregulation during radical prostatectomy: a prospective observational study
title Comparing the effect of positioning on cerebral autoregulation during radical prostatectomy: a prospective observational study
title_full Comparing the effect of positioning on cerebral autoregulation during radical prostatectomy: a prospective observational study
title_fullStr Comparing the effect of positioning on cerebral autoregulation during radical prostatectomy: a prospective observational study
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the effect of positioning on cerebral autoregulation during radical prostatectomy: a prospective observational study
title_short Comparing the effect of positioning on cerebral autoregulation during radical prostatectomy: a prospective observational study
title_sort comparing the effect of positioning on cerebral autoregulation during radical prostatectomy: a prospective observational study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8286946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32564173
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10877-020-00549-0
work_keys_str_mv AT beckstefanie comparingtheeffectofpositioningoncerebralautoregulationduringradicalprostatectomyaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT ragabhaissam comparingtheeffectofpositioningoncerebralautoregulationduringradicalprostatectomyaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT hoopdennis comparingtheeffectofpositioningoncerebralautoregulationduringradicalprostatectomyaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT meßnerschmittaurelie comparingtheeffectofpositioningoncerebralautoregulationduringradicalprostatectomyaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT rademachercornelius comparingtheeffectofpositioningoncerebralautoregulationduringradicalprostatectomyaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT kahlursula comparingtheeffectofpositioningoncerebralautoregulationduringradicalprostatectomyaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT vonbreunigfranziska comparingtheeffectofpositioningoncerebralautoregulationduringradicalprostatectomyaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT haesealexander comparingtheeffectofpositioningoncerebralautoregulationduringradicalprostatectomyaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT graefenmarkus comparingtheeffectofpositioningoncerebralautoregulationduringradicalprostatectomyaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT zollnerchristian comparingtheeffectofpositioningoncerebralautoregulationduringradicalprostatectomyaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT fischermarlene comparingtheeffectofpositioningoncerebralautoregulationduringradicalprostatectomyaprospectiveobservationalstudy