Cargando…

Simulating Visibility and Reading Performance in Low Vision

PURPOSE: Low vision reduces text visibility and causes difficulties in reading. A valid low-vision simulation could be used to evaluate the accessibility of digital text for readers with low vision. We examined the validity of a digital simulation for replicating the text visibility and reading perf...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xiong, Ying-Zi, Lei, Quan, Calabrèse, Aurélie, Legge, Gordon E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8287255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34290578
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.671121
_version_ 1783723876757274624
author Xiong, Ying-Zi
Lei, Quan
Calabrèse, Aurélie
Legge, Gordon E.
author_facet Xiong, Ying-Zi
Lei, Quan
Calabrèse, Aurélie
Legge, Gordon E.
author_sort Xiong, Ying-Zi
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Low vision reduces text visibility and causes difficulties in reading. A valid low-vision simulation could be used to evaluate the accessibility of digital text for readers with low vision. We examined the validity of a digital simulation for replicating the text visibility and reading performance of low-vision individuals. METHODS: Low-vision visibility was modeled with contrast sensitivity functions (CSFs) with parameters to represent reduced acuity and contrast sensitivity. Digital filtering incorporating these CSFs were applied to digital versions of the Lighthouse Letter Acuity Chart and the Pelli-Robson Contrast Sensitivity Chart. Reading performance (reading acuity, critical print size, and maximum reading speed) was assessed with filtered versions of the MNREAD reading acuity Chart. Thirty-six normally sighted young adults completed chart testing under normal and simulated low-vision conditions. Fifty-eight low-vision subjects (thirty with macular pathology and twenty-eight with non-macular pathology) and fifteen normally sighted older subjects completed chart testing with their habitual viewing. We hypothesized that the performance of the normally sighted young adults under simulated low-vision conditions would match the corresponding performance of actual low-vision subjects. RESULTS: When simulating low-vision conditions with visual acuity better than 1.50 logMAR (Snellen 20/630) and contrast sensitivity better than 0.15 log unit, the simulation adequately reduced the acuity and contrast sensitivity in normally sighted young subjects to the desired low-vision levels. When performing the MNREAD test with simulated low vision, the normally sighted young adults had faster maximum reading speed than both the Non-macular and Macular groups, by an average of 0.07 and 0.12 log word per minute, respectively. However, they adequately replicated the reading acuity as well as the critical print size, up to 2.00 logMAR of both low-vision groups. CONCLUSION: A low-vision simulation based on clinical measures of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity can provide good estimates of reading performance and the accessibility of digital text for a broad range of low-vision conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8287255
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82872552021-07-20 Simulating Visibility and Reading Performance in Low Vision Xiong, Ying-Zi Lei, Quan Calabrèse, Aurélie Legge, Gordon E. Front Neurosci Neuroscience PURPOSE: Low vision reduces text visibility and causes difficulties in reading. A valid low-vision simulation could be used to evaluate the accessibility of digital text for readers with low vision. We examined the validity of a digital simulation for replicating the text visibility and reading performance of low-vision individuals. METHODS: Low-vision visibility was modeled with contrast sensitivity functions (CSFs) with parameters to represent reduced acuity and contrast sensitivity. Digital filtering incorporating these CSFs were applied to digital versions of the Lighthouse Letter Acuity Chart and the Pelli-Robson Contrast Sensitivity Chart. Reading performance (reading acuity, critical print size, and maximum reading speed) was assessed with filtered versions of the MNREAD reading acuity Chart. Thirty-six normally sighted young adults completed chart testing under normal and simulated low-vision conditions. Fifty-eight low-vision subjects (thirty with macular pathology and twenty-eight with non-macular pathology) and fifteen normally sighted older subjects completed chart testing with their habitual viewing. We hypothesized that the performance of the normally sighted young adults under simulated low-vision conditions would match the corresponding performance of actual low-vision subjects. RESULTS: When simulating low-vision conditions with visual acuity better than 1.50 logMAR (Snellen 20/630) and contrast sensitivity better than 0.15 log unit, the simulation adequately reduced the acuity and contrast sensitivity in normally sighted young subjects to the desired low-vision levels. When performing the MNREAD test with simulated low vision, the normally sighted young adults had faster maximum reading speed than both the Non-macular and Macular groups, by an average of 0.07 and 0.12 log word per minute, respectively. However, they adequately replicated the reading acuity as well as the critical print size, up to 2.00 logMAR of both low-vision groups. CONCLUSION: A low-vision simulation based on clinical measures of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity can provide good estimates of reading performance and the accessibility of digital text for a broad range of low-vision conditions. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8287255/ /pubmed/34290578 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.671121 Text en Copyright © 2021 Xiong, Lei, Calabrèse and Legge. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Xiong, Ying-Zi
Lei, Quan
Calabrèse, Aurélie
Legge, Gordon E.
Simulating Visibility and Reading Performance in Low Vision
title Simulating Visibility and Reading Performance in Low Vision
title_full Simulating Visibility and Reading Performance in Low Vision
title_fullStr Simulating Visibility and Reading Performance in Low Vision
title_full_unstemmed Simulating Visibility and Reading Performance in Low Vision
title_short Simulating Visibility and Reading Performance in Low Vision
title_sort simulating visibility and reading performance in low vision
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8287255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34290578
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.671121
work_keys_str_mv AT xiongyingzi simulatingvisibilityandreadingperformanceinlowvision
AT leiquan simulatingvisibilityandreadingperformanceinlowvision
AT calabreseaurelie simulatingvisibilityandreadingperformanceinlowvision
AT leggegordone simulatingvisibilityandreadingperformanceinlowvision