Cargando…

Distinct Human Gut Microbial Taxonomic Signatures Uncovered With Different Sample Processing and Microbial Cell Disruption Methods for Metaproteomic Analysis

The use of metaproteomics for studying the human gut microbiota can shed light on the taxonomic profile and the functional role of the microbial community. Nevertheless, methods for extracting proteins from stool samples continue to evolve, in the pursuit of optimal protocols for moistening and disp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: García-Durán, Carmen, Martínez-López, Raquel, Zapico, Inés, Pérez, Enrique, Romeu, Eduardo, Arroyo, Javier, Hernáez, María Luisa, Pitarch, Aida, Monteoliva, Lucía, Gil, Concha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8287257/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34290676
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.618566
_version_ 1783723877299388416
author García-Durán, Carmen
Martínez-López, Raquel
Zapico, Inés
Pérez, Enrique
Romeu, Eduardo
Arroyo, Javier
Hernáez, María Luisa
Pitarch, Aida
Monteoliva, Lucía
Gil, Concha
author_facet García-Durán, Carmen
Martínez-López, Raquel
Zapico, Inés
Pérez, Enrique
Romeu, Eduardo
Arroyo, Javier
Hernáez, María Luisa
Pitarch, Aida
Monteoliva, Lucía
Gil, Concha
author_sort García-Durán, Carmen
collection PubMed
description The use of metaproteomics for studying the human gut microbiota can shed light on the taxonomic profile and the functional role of the microbial community. Nevertheless, methods for extracting proteins from stool samples continue to evolve, in the pursuit of optimal protocols for moistening and dispersing the stool sample and for disrupting microbial cells, which are two critical steps for ensuring good protein recovery. Here, we evaluated different stool sample processing (SSP) and microbial cell disruption methods (CDMs). The combination of a longer disintegration period of the stool sample in a tube rotator with sonication increased the overall number of identified peptides and proteins. Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Planctomycetes, and Euryarchaeota identification was favored by mechanical cell disruption with glass beads. In contrast, the relative abundance of Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, and Fusobacteria was improved when sonication was performed before bead beating. Tenericutes and Apicomplexa identification was enhanced by moistening the stool samples during processing and by disrupting cells with medium-sized glass beads combined with or without sonication. Human protein identifications were affected by sonication. To test the reproducibility of these gut metaproteomic analyses, we examined samples from six healthy individuals using a protocol that had shown a good taxonomic diversity and identification of proteins from Proteobacteria and humans. We also detected proteins involved in microbial functions relevant to the host and related mostly to specific taxa, such as B12 biosynthesis and short chain fatty acid (SCFA) production carried out mainly by members in the Prevotella genus and the Firmicutes phylum, respectively. The taxonomic and functional profiles obtained with the different protocols described in this work provides the researcher with valuable information when choosing the most adequate protocol for the study of certain pathologies under suspicion of being related to a specific taxon from the gut microbiota.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8287257
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82872572021-07-20 Distinct Human Gut Microbial Taxonomic Signatures Uncovered With Different Sample Processing and Microbial Cell Disruption Methods for Metaproteomic Analysis García-Durán, Carmen Martínez-López, Raquel Zapico, Inés Pérez, Enrique Romeu, Eduardo Arroyo, Javier Hernáez, María Luisa Pitarch, Aida Monteoliva, Lucía Gil, Concha Front Microbiol Microbiology The use of metaproteomics for studying the human gut microbiota can shed light on the taxonomic profile and the functional role of the microbial community. Nevertheless, methods for extracting proteins from stool samples continue to evolve, in the pursuit of optimal protocols for moistening and dispersing the stool sample and for disrupting microbial cells, which are two critical steps for ensuring good protein recovery. Here, we evaluated different stool sample processing (SSP) and microbial cell disruption methods (CDMs). The combination of a longer disintegration period of the stool sample in a tube rotator with sonication increased the overall number of identified peptides and proteins. Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Planctomycetes, and Euryarchaeota identification was favored by mechanical cell disruption with glass beads. In contrast, the relative abundance of Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, and Fusobacteria was improved when sonication was performed before bead beating. Tenericutes and Apicomplexa identification was enhanced by moistening the stool samples during processing and by disrupting cells with medium-sized glass beads combined with or without sonication. Human protein identifications were affected by sonication. To test the reproducibility of these gut metaproteomic analyses, we examined samples from six healthy individuals using a protocol that had shown a good taxonomic diversity and identification of proteins from Proteobacteria and humans. We also detected proteins involved in microbial functions relevant to the host and related mostly to specific taxa, such as B12 biosynthesis and short chain fatty acid (SCFA) production carried out mainly by members in the Prevotella genus and the Firmicutes phylum, respectively. The taxonomic and functional profiles obtained with the different protocols described in this work provides the researcher with valuable information when choosing the most adequate protocol for the study of certain pathologies under suspicion of being related to a specific taxon from the gut microbiota. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8287257/ /pubmed/34290676 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.618566 Text en Copyright © 2021 García-Durán, Martínez-López, Zapico, Pérez, Romeu, Arroyo, Hernáez, Pitarch, Monteoliva and Gil. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
García-Durán, Carmen
Martínez-López, Raquel
Zapico, Inés
Pérez, Enrique
Romeu, Eduardo
Arroyo, Javier
Hernáez, María Luisa
Pitarch, Aida
Monteoliva, Lucía
Gil, Concha
Distinct Human Gut Microbial Taxonomic Signatures Uncovered With Different Sample Processing and Microbial Cell Disruption Methods for Metaproteomic Analysis
title Distinct Human Gut Microbial Taxonomic Signatures Uncovered With Different Sample Processing and Microbial Cell Disruption Methods for Metaproteomic Analysis
title_full Distinct Human Gut Microbial Taxonomic Signatures Uncovered With Different Sample Processing and Microbial Cell Disruption Methods for Metaproteomic Analysis
title_fullStr Distinct Human Gut Microbial Taxonomic Signatures Uncovered With Different Sample Processing and Microbial Cell Disruption Methods for Metaproteomic Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Distinct Human Gut Microbial Taxonomic Signatures Uncovered With Different Sample Processing and Microbial Cell Disruption Methods for Metaproteomic Analysis
title_short Distinct Human Gut Microbial Taxonomic Signatures Uncovered With Different Sample Processing and Microbial Cell Disruption Methods for Metaproteomic Analysis
title_sort distinct human gut microbial taxonomic signatures uncovered with different sample processing and microbial cell disruption methods for metaproteomic analysis
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8287257/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34290676
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.618566
work_keys_str_mv AT garciadurancarmen distincthumangutmicrobialtaxonomicsignaturesuncoveredwithdifferentsampleprocessingandmicrobialcelldisruptionmethodsformetaproteomicanalysis
AT martinezlopezraquel distincthumangutmicrobialtaxonomicsignaturesuncoveredwithdifferentsampleprocessingandmicrobialcelldisruptionmethodsformetaproteomicanalysis
AT zapicoines distincthumangutmicrobialtaxonomicsignaturesuncoveredwithdifferentsampleprocessingandmicrobialcelldisruptionmethodsformetaproteomicanalysis
AT perezenrique distincthumangutmicrobialtaxonomicsignaturesuncoveredwithdifferentsampleprocessingandmicrobialcelldisruptionmethodsformetaproteomicanalysis
AT romeueduardo distincthumangutmicrobialtaxonomicsignaturesuncoveredwithdifferentsampleprocessingandmicrobialcelldisruptionmethodsformetaproteomicanalysis
AT arroyojavier distincthumangutmicrobialtaxonomicsignaturesuncoveredwithdifferentsampleprocessingandmicrobialcelldisruptionmethodsformetaproteomicanalysis
AT hernaezmarialuisa distincthumangutmicrobialtaxonomicsignaturesuncoveredwithdifferentsampleprocessingandmicrobialcelldisruptionmethodsformetaproteomicanalysis
AT pitarchaida distincthumangutmicrobialtaxonomicsignaturesuncoveredwithdifferentsampleprocessingandmicrobialcelldisruptionmethodsformetaproteomicanalysis
AT monteolivalucia distincthumangutmicrobialtaxonomicsignaturesuncoveredwithdifferentsampleprocessingandmicrobialcelldisruptionmethodsformetaproteomicanalysis
AT gilconcha distincthumangutmicrobialtaxonomicsignaturesuncoveredwithdifferentsampleprocessingandmicrobialcelldisruptionmethodsformetaproteomicanalysis