Cargando…

Conductor–Insulator Interfaces in Solid Electrolytes: A Design Strategy to Enhance Li-Ion Dynamics in Nanoconfined LiBH(4)/Al(2)O(3)

[Image: see text] Synthesizing Li-ion-conducting solid electrolytes with application-relevant properties for new energy storage devices is a challenging task that relies on a few design principles to tune ionic conductivity. When starting with originally poor ionic compounds, in many cases, a combin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zettl, Roman, Hogrefe, Katharina, Gadermaier, Bernhard, Hanzu, Ilie, Ngene, Peter, de Jongh, Petra E., Wilkening, H. Martin R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2021
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8287566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34295449
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c03789
_version_ 1783723932881256448
author Zettl, Roman
Hogrefe, Katharina
Gadermaier, Bernhard
Hanzu, Ilie
Ngene, Peter
de Jongh, Petra E.
Wilkening, H. Martin R.
author_facet Zettl, Roman
Hogrefe, Katharina
Gadermaier, Bernhard
Hanzu, Ilie
Ngene, Peter
de Jongh, Petra E.
Wilkening, H. Martin R.
author_sort Zettl, Roman
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Synthesizing Li-ion-conducting solid electrolytes with application-relevant properties for new energy storage devices is a challenging task that relies on a few design principles to tune ionic conductivity. When starting with originally poor ionic compounds, in many cases, a combination of several strategies, such as doping or substitution, is needed to achieve sufficiently high ionic conductivities. For nanostructured materials, the introduction of conductor–insulator interfacial regions represents another important design strategy. Unfortunately, for most of the two-phase nanostructured ceramics studied so far, the lower limiting conductivity values needed for applications could not be reached. Here, we show that in nanoconfined LiBH(4)/Al(2)O(3) prepared by melt infiltration, a percolating network of fast conductor–insulator Li(+) diffusion pathways could be realized. These heterocontacts provide regions with extremely rapid (7)Li NMR spin fluctuations giving direct evidence for very fast Li(+) jump processes in both nanoconfined LiBH(4)/Al(2)O(3) and LiBH(4)-LiI/Al(2)O(3). Compared to the nanocrystalline, Al(2)O(3)-free reference system LiBH(4)-LiI, nanoconfinement leads to a strongly enhanced recovery of the (7)Li NMR longitudinal magnetization. The fact that almost no difference is seen between LiBH(4)-LiI/Al(2)O(3) and LiBH(4)/Al(2)O(3) unequivocally reveals that the overall (7)Li NMR spin-lattice relaxation rates are solely controlled by the spin fluctuations near or in the conductor–insulator interfacial regions. Thus, the conductor–insulator nanoeffect, which in the ideal case relies on a percolation network of space charge regions, is independent of the choice of the bulk crystal structure of LiBH(4), either being orthorhombic (LiBH(4)/Al(2)O(3)) or hexagonal (LiBH(4)-LiI/Al(2)O(3)). (7)Li (and (1)H) NMR shows that rapid local interfacial Li-ion dynamics is corroborated by rather small activation energies on the order of only 0.1 eV. In addition, the LiI-stabilized layer-structured form of LiBH(4) guarantees fast two-dimensional (2D) bulk ion dynamics and contributes to facilitating fast long-range ion transport.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8287566
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82875662021-07-20 Conductor–Insulator Interfaces in Solid Electrolytes: A Design Strategy to Enhance Li-Ion Dynamics in Nanoconfined LiBH(4)/Al(2)O(3) Zettl, Roman Hogrefe, Katharina Gadermaier, Bernhard Hanzu, Ilie Ngene, Peter de Jongh, Petra E. Wilkening, H. Martin R. J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces [Image: see text] Synthesizing Li-ion-conducting solid electrolytes with application-relevant properties for new energy storage devices is a challenging task that relies on a few design principles to tune ionic conductivity. When starting with originally poor ionic compounds, in many cases, a combination of several strategies, such as doping or substitution, is needed to achieve sufficiently high ionic conductivities. For nanostructured materials, the introduction of conductor–insulator interfacial regions represents another important design strategy. Unfortunately, for most of the two-phase nanostructured ceramics studied so far, the lower limiting conductivity values needed for applications could not be reached. Here, we show that in nanoconfined LiBH(4)/Al(2)O(3) prepared by melt infiltration, a percolating network of fast conductor–insulator Li(+) diffusion pathways could be realized. These heterocontacts provide regions with extremely rapid (7)Li NMR spin fluctuations giving direct evidence for very fast Li(+) jump processes in both nanoconfined LiBH(4)/Al(2)O(3) and LiBH(4)-LiI/Al(2)O(3). Compared to the nanocrystalline, Al(2)O(3)-free reference system LiBH(4)-LiI, nanoconfinement leads to a strongly enhanced recovery of the (7)Li NMR longitudinal magnetization. The fact that almost no difference is seen between LiBH(4)-LiI/Al(2)O(3) and LiBH(4)/Al(2)O(3) unequivocally reveals that the overall (7)Li NMR spin-lattice relaxation rates are solely controlled by the spin fluctuations near or in the conductor–insulator interfacial regions. Thus, the conductor–insulator nanoeffect, which in the ideal case relies on a percolation network of space charge regions, is independent of the choice of the bulk crystal structure of LiBH(4), either being orthorhombic (LiBH(4)/Al(2)O(3)) or hexagonal (LiBH(4)-LiI/Al(2)O(3)). (7)Li (and (1)H) NMR shows that rapid local interfacial Li-ion dynamics is corroborated by rather small activation energies on the order of only 0.1 eV. In addition, the LiI-stabilized layer-structured form of LiBH(4) guarantees fast two-dimensional (2D) bulk ion dynamics and contributes to facilitating fast long-range ion transport. American Chemical Society 2021-07-06 2021-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8287566/ /pubmed/34295449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c03789 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Zettl, Roman
Hogrefe, Katharina
Gadermaier, Bernhard
Hanzu, Ilie
Ngene, Peter
de Jongh, Petra E.
Wilkening, H. Martin R.
Conductor–Insulator Interfaces in Solid Electrolytes: A Design Strategy to Enhance Li-Ion Dynamics in Nanoconfined LiBH(4)/Al(2)O(3)
title Conductor–Insulator Interfaces in Solid Electrolytes: A Design Strategy to Enhance Li-Ion Dynamics in Nanoconfined LiBH(4)/Al(2)O(3)
title_full Conductor–Insulator Interfaces in Solid Electrolytes: A Design Strategy to Enhance Li-Ion Dynamics in Nanoconfined LiBH(4)/Al(2)O(3)
title_fullStr Conductor–Insulator Interfaces in Solid Electrolytes: A Design Strategy to Enhance Li-Ion Dynamics in Nanoconfined LiBH(4)/Al(2)O(3)
title_full_unstemmed Conductor–Insulator Interfaces in Solid Electrolytes: A Design Strategy to Enhance Li-Ion Dynamics in Nanoconfined LiBH(4)/Al(2)O(3)
title_short Conductor–Insulator Interfaces in Solid Electrolytes: A Design Strategy to Enhance Li-Ion Dynamics in Nanoconfined LiBH(4)/Al(2)O(3)
title_sort conductor–insulator interfaces in solid electrolytes: a design strategy to enhance li-ion dynamics in nanoconfined libh(4)/al(2)o(3)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8287566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34295449
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c03789
work_keys_str_mv AT zettlroman conductorinsulatorinterfacesinsolidelectrolytesadesignstrategytoenhanceliiondynamicsinnanoconfinedlibh4al2o3
AT hogrefekatharina conductorinsulatorinterfacesinsolidelectrolytesadesignstrategytoenhanceliiondynamicsinnanoconfinedlibh4al2o3
AT gadermaierbernhard conductorinsulatorinterfacesinsolidelectrolytesadesignstrategytoenhanceliiondynamicsinnanoconfinedlibh4al2o3
AT hanzuilie conductorinsulatorinterfacesinsolidelectrolytesadesignstrategytoenhanceliiondynamicsinnanoconfinedlibh4al2o3
AT ngenepeter conductorinsulatorinterfacesinsolidelectrolytesadesignstrategytoenhanceliiondynamicsinnanoconfinedlibh4al2o3
AT dejonghpetrae conductorinsulatorinterfacesinsolidelectrolytesadesignstrategytoenhanceliiondynamicsinnanoconfinedlibh4al2o3
AT wilkeninghmartinr conductorinsulatorinterfacesinsolidelectrolytesadesignstrategytoenhanceliiondynamicsinnanoconfinedlibh4al2o3