Cargando…
Comparison of community-led distribution of HIV self-tests kits with distribution by paid distributors: a cluster randomised trial in rural Zimbabwean communities
BACKGROUND: We compared community-led versus an established community-based HIV self-testing (HIVST) model in rural Zimbabwe using a cluster-randomised trial. METHODS: Forty village groups were randomised 1:1 using restricted randomisation to community-led HIVST, where communities planned and implem...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8287604/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34275872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005000 |
_version_ | 1783723940502306816 |
---|---|
author | Sibanda, Euphemia Lindelwe Mangenah, Collin Neuman, Melissa Tumushime, Mary Watadzaushe, Constancia Mutseta, Miriam N Maringwa, Galven Dirawo, Jeffrey Fielding, Katherine L Johnson, Cheryl Ncube, Getrude Taegtmeyer, Miriam Hatzold, Karin Corbett, Elizabeth Lucy Terris-Prestholt, Fern Cowan, Frances M |
author_facet | Sibanda, Euphemia Lindelwe Mangenah, Collin Neuman, Melissa Tumushime, Mary Watadzaushe, Constancia Mutseta, Miriam N Maringwa, Galven Dirawo, Jeffrey Fielding, Katherine L Johnson, Cheryl Ncube, Getrude Taegtmeyer, Miriam Hatzold, Karin Corbett, Elizabeth Lucy Terris-Prestholt, Fern Cowan, Frances M |
author_sort | Sibanda, Euphemia Lindelwe |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We compared community-led versus an established community-based HIV self-testing (HIVST) model in rural Zimbabwe using a cluster-randomised trial. METHODS: Forty village groups were randomised 1:1 using restricted randomisation to community-led HIVST, where communities planned and implemented HIVST distribution for 4 weeks, or paid distribution (PD), where distributors were paid US$50 to distribute kits door-to-door over 4 weeks. Individual level primary outcomes compared household survey responses by arm 4 months post-intervention for: (1) newly diagnosed HIV during/within 4 months following HIVST distribution, (2) linkage to confirmatory testing, pre-exposure prophylaxis or voluntary medical male circumcision during/within 4 months following HIVST distribution. Participants were not masked to allocation; analysis used masked data. Trial analysis used random-effects logistic regression. Distribution costs compared: (1) community-led HIVST, (2) PD HIVST and (3) PD costs when first implemented in 2016/2017. RESULTS: From October 2018 to August 2019, 27 812 and 36 699 HIVST kits were distributed in community-led and PD communities, respectively. We surveyed 11 150 participants and 5683 were in community-led arm. New HIV diagnosis was reported by 211 (3.7%) community-led versus 197 (3.6%) PD arm participants, adjusted OR (aOR) 1.1 (95% CI 0.72 to 1.56); 318 (25.9%) community-led arm participants linked to post-test services versus 361 (23.9%) in PD arm, aOR 1.1 (95% CI 0.75 to 1.49. Cost per HIVST kit distributed was US$6.29 and US$10.25 for PD and community-led HIVST, both lower than 2016/2017 costs for newly implemented PD (US$14.52). No social harms were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Community-led HIVST can perform as well as paid distribution, with lower costs in the first year. These costs may reduce with programme maturity/learning. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: PACTR201811849455568. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8287604 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82876042021-07-30 Comparison of community-led distribution of HIV self-tests kits with distribution by paid distributors: a cluster randomised trial in rural Zimbabwean communities Sibanda, Euphemia Lindelwe Mangenah, Collin Neuman, Melissa Tumushime, Mary Watadzaushe, Constancia Mutseta, Miriam N Maringwa, Galven Dirawo, Jeffrey Fielding, Katherine L Johnson, Cheryl Ncube, Getrude Taegtmeyer, Miriam Hatzold, Karin Corbett, Elizabeth Lucy Terris-Prestholt, Fern Cowan, Frances M BMJ Glob Health Original Research BACKGROUND: We compared community-led versus an established community-based HIV self-testing (HIVST) model in rural Zimbabwe using a cluster-randomised trial. METHODS: Forty village groups were randomised 1:1 using restricted randomisation to community-led HIVST, where communities planned and implemented HIVST distribution for 4 weeks, or paid distribution (PD), where distributors were paid US$50 to distribute kits door-to-door over 4 weeks. Individual level primary outcomes compared household survey responses by arm 4 months post-intervention for: (1) newly diagnosed HIV during/within 4 months following HIVST distribution, (2) linkage to confirmatory testing, pre-exposure prophylaxis or voluntary medical male circumcision during/within 4 months following HIVST distribution. Participants were not masked to allocation; analysis used masked data. Trial analysis used random-effects logistic regression. Distribution costs compared: (1) community-led HIVST, (2) PD HIVST and (3) PD costs when first implemented in 2016/2017. RESULTS: From October 2018 to August 2019, 27 812 and 36 699 HIVST kits were distributed in community-led and PD communities, respectively. We surveyed 11 150 participants and 5683 were in community-led arm. New HIV diagnosis was reported by 211 (3.7%) community-led versus 197 (3.6%) PD arm participants, adjusted OR (aOR) 1.1 (95% CI 0.72 to 1.56); 318 (25.9%) community-led arm participants linked to post-test services versus 361 (23.9%) in PD arm, aOR 1.1 (95% CI 0.75 to 1.49. Cost per HIVST kit distributed was US$6.29 and US$10.25 for PD and community-led HIVST, both lower than 2016/2017 costs for newly implemented PD (US$14.52). No social harms were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Community-led HIVST can perform as well as paid distribution, with lower costs in the first year. These costs may reduce with programme maturity/learning. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: PACTR201811849455568. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8287604/ /pubmed/34275872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005000 Text en © World Health Organization 2023. Licensee BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/igo/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution IGO License (CC BY NC 3.0 IGO (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/igo/) ), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. In any reproduction of this article there should not be any suggestion that WHO or this article endorse any specific organization or products. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. This notice should be preserved along with the article’s original URL. Disclaimer: The author is a staff member of the World Health Organization. The author alone is responsible for the views expressed in this publication and they do not necessarily represent the views, decisions or policies of the World Health Organization. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Sibanda, Euphemia Lindelwe Mangenah, Collin Neuman, Melissa Tumushime, Mary Watadzaushe, Constancia Mutseta, Miriam N Maringwa, Galven Dirawo, Jeffrey Fielding, Katherine L Johnson, Cheryl Ncube, Getrude Taegtmeyer, Miriam Hatzold, Karin Corbett, Elizabeth Lucy Terris-Prestholt, Fern Cowan, Frances M Comparison of community-led distribution of HIV self-tests kits with distribution by paid distributors: a cluster randomised trial in rural Zimbabwean communities |
title | Comparison of community-led distribution of HIV self-tests kits with distribution by paid distributors: a cluster randomised trial in rural Zimbabwean communities |
title_full | Comparison of community-led distribution of HIV self-tests kits with distribution by paid distributors: a cluster randomised trial in rural Zimbabwean communities |
title_fullStr | Comparison of community-led distribution of HIV self-tests kits with distribution by paid distributors: a cluster randomised trial in rural Zimbabwean communities |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of community-led distribution of HIV self-tests kits with distribution by paid distributors: a cluster randomised trial in rural Zimbabwean communities |
title_short | Comparison of community-led distribution of HIV self-tests kits with distribution by paid distributors: a cluster randomised trial in rural Zimbabwean communities |
title_sort | comparison of community-led distribution of hiv self-tests kits with distribution by paid distributors: a cluster randomised trial in rural zimbabwean communities |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8287604/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34275872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005000 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sibandaeuphemialindelwe comparisonofcommunityleddistributionofhivselftestskitswithdistributionbypaiddistributorsaclusterrandomisedtrialinruralzimbabweancommunities AT mangenahcollin comparisonofcommunityleddistributionofhivselftestskitswithdistributionbypaiddistributorsaclusterrandomisedtrialinruralzimbabweancommunities AT neumanmelissa comparisonofcommunityleddistributionofhivselftestskitswithdistributionbypaiddistributorsaclusterrandomisedtrialinruralzimbabweancommunities AT tumushimemary comparisonofcommunityleddistributionofhivselftestskitswithdistributionbypaiddistributorsaclusterrandomisedtrialinruralzimbabweancommunities AT watadzausheconstancia comparisonofcommunityleddistributionofhivselftestskitswithdistributionbypaiddistributorsaclusterrandomisedtrialinruralzimbabweancommunities AT mutsetamiriamn comparisonofcommunityleddistributionofhivselftestskitswithdistributionbypaiddistributorsaclusterrandomisedtrialinruralzimbabweancommunities AT maringwagalven comparisonofcommunityleddistributionofhivselftestskitswithdistributionbypaiddistributorsaclusterrandomisedtrialinruralzimbabweancommunities AT dirawojeffrey comparisonofcommunityleddistributionofhivselftestskitswithdistributionbypaiddistributorsaclusterrandomisedtrialinruralzimbabweancommunities AT fieldingkatherinel comparisonofcommunityleddistributionofhivselftestskitswithdistributionbypaiddistributorsaclusterrandomisedtrialinruralzimbabweancommunities AT johnsoncheryl comparisonofcommunityleddistributionofhivselftestskitswithdistributionbypaiddistributorsaclusterrandomisedtrialinruralzimbabweancommunities AT ncubegetrude comparisonofcommunityleddistributionofhivselftestskitswithdistributionbypaiddistributorsaclusterrandomisedtrialinruralzimbabweancommunities AT taegtmeyermiriam comparisonofcommunityleddistributionofhivselftestskitswithdistributionbypaiddistributorsaclusterrandomisedtrialinruralzimbabweancommunities AT hatzoldkarin comparisonofcommunityleddistributionofhivselftestskitswithdistributionbypaiddistributorsaclusterrandomisedtrialinruralzimbabweancommunities AT corbettelizabethlucy comparisonofcommunityleddistributionofhivselftestskitswithdistributionbypaiddistributorsaclusterrandomisedtrialinruralzimbabweancommunities AT terrisprestholtfern comparisonofcommunityleddistributionofhivselftestskitswithdistributionbypaiddistributorsaclusterrandomisedtrialinruralzimbabweancommunities AT cowanfrancesm comparisonofcommunityleddistributionofhivselftestskitswithdistributionbypaiddistributorsaclusterrandomisedtrialinruralzimbabweancommunities |